Close Encounters of the Tertiary Kind: Science Fiction as Tertiary Epic

References

1. • Angenot, M. (1979), “The Absent Paradigm: An Introduction to the Semiotics of Science Fiction”, Science Fiction Studies 6(1): 9–19 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/4239220).
   [Google Scholar]
2. • Dalley, S. (ed. & trans.) (2000), Myths of Mesopotamia. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. • Delany, S., Chaney, M. (2012), Starboard Wine: More Notes on the Language of Science Fiction. Middleton: Wesleyan University Press (Kindle File. Retrieved from kindle.com.).
   [Google Scholar]
4. • Foster, B. (trans.) (2001), The Epic of Gilgamesh. New York: Norton Critical Editions.
   [Google Scholar]
5. • Gottschall, J. (2008), The Rape of Troy: Evolution, Violence and the World of Homer. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. • Homer (1961), The Iliad of Homer. Trans. Richmond Lattimore. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. • Lewis, C.S. (1961), A Preface to Paradise Lost. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. • Milton, J. (1999), Paradise Lost. Ed. B. Raffel. New York: Bantam.
   [Google Scholar]
9. • Rabkin, E. (2004), “Science Fiction and the Future of Criticism”, PMLA 119(3): 457–473 (http://www.jstor.org/stable/25486061).
   [Google Scholar]
10. • Rabkin, E. (1979), “Metalinguistics and Science Fiction”, Critical Inquiry 6(1): 79–97 (http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343087).
    [Google Scholar]
11. • Searle, J. (1999), Mind, Language and Society. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
12. • Searle, J. (1975), “The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse”, New Literary History 6(2): 319–332 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/468422).
    [Google Scholar]
13. • Simon, H. (1990), “Invariants of Human Behavior”, Annual Review of Psychology 41: 1–19 (Retrieved from http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/[email protected]–1).
    [Google Scholar]
14. • Suvin, D. (1972), “On the Poetics of the Science Fiction Genre”, College English 34(3): 372–381 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/375141?).
    [Google Scholar]