Skip to content
1882
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2031-5929
  • E-ISSN: 2294-8775

Abstract

Abstract

The paper deals briefly with several different historiographical interpretations of the Second Vatican Council. It then critically analyses how the conflict surrounding an interpretation of Vatican II was in turn subject, within the Catholic Church and due especially to Benedict XVI, to an interpretation that dismissed the hermeneutical approach accentuating the aspects of renewal and break with tradition and proposed an interpretation of continuity as the only authentic one coherent with the Council. Finally, the article points out how, out of various interpretations of Vatican II, different ecclesiastical expressions and experiences - more or less divergent and sometimes diametrically opposed - have developed in recent decades and that the historic interpretation of the significance of the Council must not be made dependant on their success.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.ASR.1.103463
2013-01-01
2025-12-09

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.ASR.1.103463
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv