Skip to content
1882
Volume 59, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0068-4023
  • E-ISSN: 2034-6476

Abstract

Abstract

Despite being one of the major figures in late medieval thought and being the subject of numerous studies, certain topics concerning the Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) remain in need of further investigation. One of these is an aspect of his theory of cognition: his account of sense perception. It is our aim in this study to systematically look at his scattered remarks on the topic and make a number of suggestions as to the nature of his thought on how we come to know external things. It is not our purpose to offer a comprehensive account of his theory of cognition. Our focus in this article is on his account of perception and the specific claim that Nicholas develops a model whereby reason operates together with the senses in perceptual experience. Despite being tentative our claim is grounded on suggestions found in the scholarship on Cusanus; but these suggestions remain quite vague and in need of exploration. In this article, we closely examine the textual evidence and develop our claim based on this examination. In order to substantiate it, we proceed as follows: first, we consider the core theses on perception in several of Nicholas’ works. Second, we bring these elements together and propose a reading of how perception is rational according to Cusanus. Despite being an academic outsider and employing terminology in a way that sometimes obstructs interpretive access, our paper shows that Nicholas is well-acquainted with the different traditions in the philosophy of perception, especially perspectivist optics and medieval Augustinianism. In addition, and as the result of the role he attributes to reason in our experience of the world, Cusanus occupies an important place in the history of the development of theories of perception.

© Brepols Publishers NV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.BPM.5.115835
2017-01-01
2025-12-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Sources
    Aristoteles. De anima, ed. I. Bekker. Berlin 1831.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Augustinus. De Trinitate libri XV. Libri I-XII. Ed. W. J. Mountain et F. Glorie (CCSL 50). Aurelii Augustini Opera. Pars 16.1. Turnhout 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Avicenna, Liber de anima seu sextus de naturalibus I-III. ed. S. van Riet (Avicenna Latinus 1.1). Édition critique de la traduction latine médiévale. Introduction sur la doctrine psychologique d’Avicenne par G. Verbeke. Louvain-Leiden 1972.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Avicenna, Liber de anima seu sextus de naturalibus IV-V. Ed. S. van Riet (Avicenna Latinus 1.2). Édition critique de la traduction latine médiévale. Introduction sur la doctrine psychologique d’Avicenne par G. Verbeke. Louvain-Leiden 1968.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Blasius de Pelacanis de Parma. Quaestiones de anima. Ed. G. F. Vescovini and J. Biard. In: Le Quaestiones de anima di Biagio Pelacani da Parma. Firenze 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Ibn al-Haytham. De aspectibus. Ed. and transl. A. M. Smith (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 91). In: Alhacen’s Theory of Visual Perception, Philadelphia 2001.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ioannes Saresberienis. De septem septenis. Ed. J. P. Migne (PL 199, 945-964). Paris 1853.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Nicolaus Cusanus. Compendium. Ed. K. Bormann et B. Decker. Nicolai de Cusa Opera Omnia, iussu et auctoritate Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis ad codicum fidem edita 11.3. Hamburg 1964.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Nicolaus Cusanus. De apice theoriae. Ed. R. Klibansky et H. G. Senger. Nicolai de Cusa Opera Omnia, iussu et auctoritate Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis ad codicum fidem edita 12. Hamburg 1982.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Nicolaus Cusanus. De coniecturis. Ed. J. Koch, K. Bormann et H. G. Senger. Nicolai de Cusa Opera Omnia, iussu et auctoritate Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis ad codicum fidem edita 3. Hamburg 1972.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Nicolaus Cusanus. De docta ignorantia. Ed. K. Bormann. Nicolai de Cusa Opera Omnia, iussu et auctoritate Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis ad codicum fidem edita 1. Hamburg 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Nicolaus Cusanus. Idiota de mente. Ed. R. Steiger. Nicolai de Cusa Opera Omnia, iussu et auctoritate Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis ad codicum fidem edita 5. Hamburg 1983.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Pseudo-Augustinus. De spiritu et anima, Ed. J. P. Migne (PL 40, 779-832). Paris 1841.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Rogerus Bacon. De multiplicatione specierum. Ed. and trans. D. C. Lindberg. In: Roger Bacon’s Philosophy of Nature. Oxford 1983.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Rogerus Bacon. Perspectiva. Ed. and trans. D. C. Lindberg. In: Roger Bacon and the origins of Perspectiva in the Middle Ages. Oxford 1996.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Theodoricus Carnotensis. Commentum super Boethii librum De Trinitate. Ed. N. M. Häring. In: Commentaries on Boethius by Thierry of Chartres and his School. Toronto 1971.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Thomas de Aquino. Summa Theologiae Ia q. 50-119. Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII edita, cum commentariis Caietani. Rome 1889.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Research
    Adriaenssen, H. T. “Peter John Olivi on Perceptual Representation.” In: Vivarium 49.4 (2011), 324-352.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Baumgarten, H.-U. “Nikolaus von Kues’ Theorie der Wahrnehmung.” In: Philosophisches Jahrbuch 106 (1999), 300-311.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Beierwaltes, W. “‘Centrum tocius vite’. Zur Bedeutung von Proklos’ Theologia Platonis im Denken des Cusanus.” In: Proclus et la théologie platonicienne. Actes du Colloque International de Louvain (13-16 mai 1998). En l’honneur de H. D. Saffrey et L. G. Westerink, ed. H. D. Saffrey and L. G. Westerink. Leuven-Paris 2000, 629-651.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bocken, I. “Perspektiven der Theorie. Philosophie als scientia aenigmatica bei Nicolaus Cusanus.” In: Spiegel und Porträt. Zur Bedeutung zweier zentraler Bilder im Denken des Nicolaus Cusanus. Festgabe für Klaus Reinhardt zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. I. Bocken and H. Schwaetzer (Veröffentlichungen des Cusanus-Studien-Centrums 5). Maastricht 2005, 29-48.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bono, J. J. “Medical Spirits and the Medieval Language of Life.” In: Traditio 40 (1984), 91-130.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hackett, J. “Animal and Human Knowledge in the Perspectiva: (Opus Maius, part five) of Roger Bacon.” In: Philosophical Psychology in Arabic Thought and the Latin Aristotelianism of the 13th Century, ed. L. X. López-Farjeat and J. A. Tellkamp. Paris 2013, 223-241.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hopkins, J. Nicholas of Cusa on Wisdom and Knowledge. Minneapolis 1996.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kiening, Ch. “Gradus visionis. Reflexion des Sehens in der cusanischen Philosophie.” In: Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 19, ed. R. Haubst: Münster 1991, 243-272.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kleinz, J. P. The Theory of Knowledge of Hugh of St. Victor (The Catholic University of America Philosophical Studies 87). Washington, D. C. 1944.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kny, C. Kreative, asymptotische Assimilation (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, Neue Folge 84). Münster 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kremer, K. “Erkennen bei Nikolaus von Kues. Apriorismus – Assimilation – Abstraktion.” In: Praegustatio naturalis sapientiae. Gott suchen mit Nikolaus von Kues, ed. K. Kremer (Buchreihe der Cusanus-Gesellschaft. Sonderausgabe). Münster 2004, 3-49.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Leijenhorst, C. “Active Perception from Nicholas of Cusa to Thomas Hobbes.” In: Active Perception in the History of Philosophy, ed. J. F. Silva and M. Yrjönsuuri (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 14). Dordrecht a. o. 2014, 167-185.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Leinkauf, T. Nicolaus Cusanus (Buchreihe der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 15). Münster 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lindberg, D. C. Theories of Vision. From Al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago 1976.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. di Martino, C. Ratio Particularis. Doctrine des sens internes d’Avicenne à Thomas d’Aquin (Etudes de philosophie médiévale 94). Paris 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. McTighe, T. P. “Contingentia and Alteritas in Cusa’s Metaphysics.” In: American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64/1 (1990), 55-71.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. McTighe, T. P. “Thierry of Chartres and Nicholas of Cusa’s Epistemology.” In: Proceedings of the PMR conference. Annual publication of the Patristic, Mediaeval, and Renaissance Conference V (1980), 169-176.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Miller, C. L. “Cusanus, Nicolaus [Nicolas of Cusa].” In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), ed. E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/cusanus.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Moritz, A. Explizite Komplikationen. Der radikale Holismus des Nikolaus von Kues (Buchreihe der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 14). Münster 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Müller, I. “Nikolaus von Kues und die Medizin.” In: Nikolaus von Kues 1401-2001. Akten des Symposiums in Bernkastel-Kues vom 23. bis 26. Mai 2001, ed. K. Kremer and K. Reinhardt (Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 28). Trier 2003, 333-350.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Oide, S. “Der Einfluss der galenischen Pneumatheorie auf die cusanische Spiritustheorie.” In: Das Menschenbild des Nikolaus von Kues und der christliche Humanismus. Die Referate des Symposiums in Trier vom 6.-8. Oktober 1977, ed. M. Bodewig, J. Schmitz and R. Weier (Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 13). Mainz 1978, 198-207.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Reinhardt, K. “Complicatio – explicatio.” In: Manuductiones. Festschrift zu Ehren von Jorge M. Marchetta und Claudia D’Amico, ed. C. Rusconi (Texte und Studien zur europäischen Geistesgeschichte 8). Münster 2014, 81-91.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Reinhardt, K. and Schwaetzer, H. (eds.). Nikolaus von Kues in der Geschichte des Platonismus (Philosophie interdisziplinär 19). Regensburg 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rignani, O. “Biagio Pelacani e il senso agente.” In: Corpo e anima, sensi interni e intelletto dai secoli XIII-XIV ai Post-Cartesiani e Spinoziani, ed. G. F. Vescovini a. o. Turnhout 2005, 247-266.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Rusconi, C. “Commentator Boethii ‘De Trinitate’ […] ingenio clarissimus. Die Kommentare des Thierry von Chartres zu De Trinitate des Boethius als Quellen des Cusanus.” In: Der Gottes-Gedanke des Nikolaus von Kues. Akten des Symposions in Trier vom 21. bis 23. Oktober 2010, ed. W. A. Euler, N. Bohnert and A. Geissler (Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 33). Trier 2010, 247-290.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rusconi, C. “Die Verwandlung der Necessitas Complexionis von Thierry von Chartres zu Nikolaus von Kues. Ein Versuch zur Systematisierung der modi essendi-Lehre.” In: Akten des Forschungskolloquiums in Freising vom 8. bis 11. November 2012, ed. W. A. Euler (Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus-Gesellschaft 34). Trier 2016, 239-258.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Sabra, A. I. “Sensation and Inference in Alhacen’s Theory of Visual Perception.” In: Studies in Perception. Interrelations in the History of Philosophy and Science, ed. P. K. Machamer and R. G. Turnbull. Columbus, OH 1978, 160-185.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Silva, J. F. “Augustine on Active Perception.” In: Active Perception in the History of Philosophy, ed. J. F. Silva and M. Yrjönsuuri (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 14). Dordrecht a. o. 2014, 79-98.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Silva, J. F. “Medieval Theories of Active Perception: an Overview.” In: Active Perception in the History of Philosophy, ed. J. F. Silva and M. Yrjönsuuri (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 14). Dordrecht a. o. 2014, 117-146.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Silva, J. F. “Perceptual Judgment in Late Medieval Perspectivist Psychology.” In: Filosoficky Casopis, Special Issue on Perception in Scholastics and Their Interlocutors 2 (2017), 29-60.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Silva, J. F. Robert Kilwardby on the Human Soul. Plurality of Forms and Censorship in the Thirteenth-Century (Investigating Medieval Philosophy 3). Leiden 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Silva, J. F. “The Chameleonic Mind. The Activity versus the Actuality of Perception.” forthcoming.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Silva, J. F. and Toivanen, J. “The Active Nature of the Soul in Sense Perception: Robert Kilwardby and Peter John of Olivi.” In Vivarium 48.3-4 (2010), 245-278.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M. “Introduction: The World as a Stereogram”, in Active Perception in the History of Philosophy, ed. J. F. Silva and M. Yrjönsuuri (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind 14). Dordrecht a. o. 2014, 1-7.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith, A. M. From Sight to Light. The Passage from Ancient to Modern Optics. Chicago-London 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Spruit, L. Species intelligibilis. From Perception to Knowledge 2: Renaissance Controversies, Later Scholasticism, and the Elimination of the Intelligible Species in Modern Philosophy (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 49). Leiden 1995.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Tachau, K. H. Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology, and the Foundations of Semantics, 1250-1345 (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 22). Leiden 1988.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. van Velthoven, T. Gottesschau und menschliche Kreativität: Studien zur Erkenntnislehre des Nikolaus von Kues. Leiden 1977.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wilcox, J. The Transmission and Influence of Qusta Ibn Luqa’s On the Difference between Spirit and Soul. New York 1985.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.BPM.5.115835
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv