Skip to content
1882
Collections, Knowledge, and Time
  • ISSN: 0008-8994
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0498
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Collections of living organisms are reservoirs of biological knowledge that operate across times and places. From the mid-20th century, scientific institutions dedicated to the cultivation of such collections have routinized and professionalized their care. But “care,” for these collections, is focused not just on individual organisms—instead, a principal aim of a curator is to maintain the integrity of a reproducing “strain,” “variety,” “line,” or “stock,” and the composition of a collection as a whole. This paper explores the forms, the material dimensions, the temporalities, and the values of that care, to recover the conditions under which scientist-custodians maintain continuity of research over many decades. This paper does so by focusing on two rather different kinds of scientific collection: that of Drosophila fruit flies on the one hand, and plant seeds on the other. Their comparison is valuable because their vastly different needs and life cycles engender very different practices of care. Comparing the materialities, life cycles, needs, and values of these divergent collections helps to draw attention to the routine and the apparently mundane. First, the paper asks: what kinds of work go into managing such collections—that is, the day-to-day management and cultivation, surveillance, and administration of information? Second, it asks: how do these practices maintain the integrity of the strains and stocks, and the collections themselves? What kinds of value does this work create? Third, what are the future imaginaries that are rhetorically drawn into the funding strategies of these collections, and how do they envision future use, ownership, and control?

© 2023 The Author(s).
This is an open access article made available under a cc by 4.0 International License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.135352
2023-01-01
2025-12-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cnt/65/2/J.CNT.5.135352.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.135352&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2019). What's the use? On the uses of use. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  2. Ankeny, R. A., & Leonelli, S. (2011). What's so special about model organisms? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 42(2), 313–323.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ankeny, R. A., Leonelli, S., Nelson, N. C., & Ramsden, E. (2014). Making organisms model human behavior: Situated models in North-American alcohol research, since 1950. Science in Context, 27(3), 485–509.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bangham, J. (2019). Living collections: Care and curation at Drosophila Stock Centres. BJHS Themes, 4, 123–147.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bangham, J., Chacko, X. S., & Kaplan, J. (Eds.). (2022). Invisible labour in modern science. London, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.
  6. Bärnreuther, S. (2018). Suitable substances: How biobanks (re)store biologicals. New Genetics and Society, 37(4), 319–337. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergman, J. O. (2018, March 9). A warning cry from the doomsday vault. Bloomberg. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-09/a-warning-cry-from-the-doomsday-vault
  8. Burbank, L. (1922). Half-hour experiments with plants. New York, NY: P. F. Collier & Son.
  9. Carrington, D. (2017a, May 19). The Arctic doomsday seed vault flooded. Thanks, global warming. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2017/05/arctic-doomsday-seed-vault-flooded-thanks-global-warming/
  10. Carrington, D. (2017b, May 19). Arctic stronghold of world's seeds flooded after permafrost melts. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/19/arctic-stronghold-of-worlds-seeds-flooded-after-permafrost-melts
  11. Chacko, X. S. (2019). Creative practices of care: The subjectivity, agency, and affective labor of preparing seeds for long-term banking. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 41(2), 97–106.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chacko, X. S. (2022a). Invisible vitality: The hidden labours of seed banking. In J. Bangham, X. S. Chacko, & J. Kaplan (Eds.), Invisible labour in modern science (pp. 217–225). London, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.
  13. Chacko, X. S. (2022b). Stringing, reconnecting, and breaking the colonial “daisy chain”: From botanic garden to seed bank. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 8(1), 1–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chrulew, M. (2017). Freezing the ark: The cryopolitics of endangered species preservation. In J. Radin & E. Kowal (Eds.), Cryopolitics: Frozen life in a melting world (pp. 283–306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  15. Cooper, M. E. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
  16. Cooper, M., & Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical labor: Tissue donors and research subjects in the global bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  17. Creager, A. N. (2002). The life of a virus: Tobacco mosaic virus as an experimental model, 1930–1965. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  18. Cromer, R., Hardin, J., & Nyssa, Z. (2020). Reckoning with saving. Journal for the Anthropology of North America, 23(1), 67–69. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Curry, H. A. (2017). From working collections to the World Germplasm Project: Agricultural modernization and genetic conservation at the Rockefeller Foundation. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 39(2), 5.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Curry, H. A. (2019). From bean collection to seed bank: Transformations in heirloom vegetable conservation, 1970–1985. BJHS Themes, 4, 149–167.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Ellison, R. (2020, July 13). “It takes a toll”: Researchers struggle with lockdown cull of lab mice. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/2020/jul/13/laboratory-mice-cull-coronavirus-researchers-vivisection
  22. Franklin, S. (2013). Biological relatives: IVF, stem cells and the future of kinship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  23. Friese, C. (2013). Realizing potential in translational medicine: The uncanny emergence of care as science. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), S129–S138.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Friese, C. (2019). Intimate entanglements in the animal house: Caring for and about mice. The Sociological Review, 67(2), 287–298.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Friese, C., & Marris, C. (2014). Making de-extinction mundane? PLoS Biology, 12(3), e1001825.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gere, C., & Parry, B. (2006). The flesh made word: Banking the body in the age of information. Biosocieties, 1(1), 41–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Giaimo, C. (2020, December 14). Fruit flies are essential to science. So are the workers who keep them alive. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/14/science/fruit-flies-covid.html
  28. Griffin, A. (2018, March 4). Seed vaults protect the world from the apocalypse—But what if doomsday is already here? Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/seed-vault-doomsday-svalbard-norway-milennium-kew-biodiversity-bank-gene-a8237221.html
  29. Grimm, D. (2020, March 23). “It's heartbreaking.” Labs are euthanizing thousands of mice in response to coronavirus pandemic. Science. Retrieved from https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/it-s-heartbreaking-labs-are-euthanizing-thousands-mice-response-coronavirus-pandemic
  30. Hobart, H. J., & Maroney, S. (2019). On racial constitutions and digestive therapeutics. Food, Culture, & Society, 22(5), 576–594.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Høyer, K. (2017). Suspense: Reflections on the cryopolitics of the body. In J. Radin & E. Kowal (Eds.), Cryopolitics: Frozen life in a melting world (pp. 205–214). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  32. Jent, K. (2017). Making stem cell niches: An ethnography of regenerative medicine in Scotland and the United States (Doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, UK.
  33. Kang, D. [@kang_dave]. (2020, March 19). My lab assistant helping me maintain our Drosophila lines [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/kang_dave/status/1240321664505778178
  34. Kaufman, T. (n.d.). A short history of the formative years at the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC). Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. Retrieved from https://bdsc.indiana.edu/about/history.html
  35. Kohler, R. E. (1994). Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Kowal, E., Radin, J., & Reardon, J. (2013). Indigenous body parts, mutating temporalities, and the half-lives of postcolonial technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 43(4), 465–483.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kroløkke, C. (2018). Global fluids: The cultural politics of reproductive waste and value. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
  38. Leonelli, S. (2007). Arabidopsis, the botanical Drosophila: From mouse cress to model organism. Endeavour, 31(1), 34–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lindsley, D. L., & Grell, E. H. (1968). Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution.
  40. Littleton, T. [@JTroyLittleton]. (2020, March 20). Shut down the lab today due to COVID-19. Had to discard about ~70% of our Drosophila stock collection – sad to [Tweet]. Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/JTroyLittleton/status/1240760196403773443
  41. Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Matthews, K., & Qualset, K. (1994). Living culture collections a national asset: Experts set recommendations for the future. NGRP Network News, p. 48.
  43. McHale, E. (2019, January 7). Back from the brink: 5 plants that almost became extinct. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Retrieved from https://www.kew.org/read-and-watch/plants-extinct-temperate-house
  44. Milanovic, F., & Lefèvre, F. (2018). Biobanking in forestry practices: Towards an agency policy? New Genetics and Society, 37(4), 411–434. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Milanovic, F., Merleau-Ponty, N., & Pitrou, P. (2017). Biobanques: Quelles reconfigurations pour le vivant? Approches interdisciplinaires. Natures sciences sociétés (Montrouge), 25(3), 268–275. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
  46. Milanovic, F., Merleau-Ponty, N., & Pitrou, P. (2018). Biobanks and the reconfiguration of the living. New Genetics and Society, 37(4), 285–295. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Murphy, M. (2017). The economization of life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  48. Myelnikov, D., & Peres, S. (2022). The cold futures of mouse genetics: Modes of strain cryopreservation since the 1970s. Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Namberger, V. (2019). The reproductive body at work: The South African bioeconomy of egg donation. London, UK: Routledge.
  50. Nelson, N. (2018). Building epistemic scaffolds for modeling work. In N. Nelson (Ed.), Model behavior (pp. 81–111). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  51. Newman, S., & Nahman, M. (2020). Nurture commodified? An investigation into commercial human milk supply chains. Review of International Political Economy. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Nowogrodzki, A. (2020). Cull, release or bring them home: Coronavirus crisis forces hard decisions for labs with animals. Nature, 580(7801), 19–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. O'Grady, P. M. (2021, November 24). Award abstract #2030129. RAPID: National Drosophila Species Stock Center Covid-19 relief and recovery. National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2030129&HistoricalAwards
  54. Parry, B. (2004). Trading the genome: Investigating the commodification of bio-information. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  55. Peres, S. (2016). Saving the gene pool for the future: Seed banks as archives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C, 55, 96–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Pischedda, A. [@AlisonPischedda]. (2020, April 2). Faced with shutting down my research lab and uncertainty over whether I could keep commuting into NYC, I have set [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/AlisonPischedda/status/1245698597762498560
  57. Provost, C. (2015, May 10). A worldwide network of seed information is taking root. Science and Development Network. Retrieved from https://www.scidev.net/global/conservation/feature/worldwide-network-seed-information-system.html
  58. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  59. Puijk, K., & de Jong, G. (1972). α-amylases in a population of D. melanogaster from Dahomey. Drosophila Information Service, 49, 61.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Radin, J. (2015). Planning for the past: Cryopreservation at the farm, zoo, and museum. In F. Vidal & N. Dias (Eds.), Endangerment, biodiversity and culture (pp. 218–240). London, UK: Routledge.
  61. Radin, J. (2017). Life on ice: A history of new uses for cold blood. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  62. Radin, J., & Kowal, E. (Eds.). (2017). Cryopolitics: Frozen life in a melting world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  63. RBG Kew. (2020, November 19). Seeds of hope: Kew's Millennium Seed Bank celebrates 20 years with 2.4 billion seeds banked. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Retrieved from https://www.kew.org/about-us/press-media/Kew-millennium-seed-bank-20-years
  64. Rice, W. R., Linder, J. E., Friberg, U., Lew, T. A., Morrow, E. H., & Stewart, A. D. (2005). Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: Assessment with hemiclonal analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 6527–6534. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Sepkoski, D. (2020). Catastrophic thinking: Extinction and the value of diversity from Darwin to the anthropocene. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  66. Sgro, C. M., & Partridge, L. (2000). Evolutionary responses of the life history of wild-caught Drosophila melanogaster to two standard methods of laboratory culture. The American Naturalist, 156(4), 341–353.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Stoler, A. L. (2016). Duress: Imperial durabilities in our times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  68. Svendsen, M. N., Navne, L. E., Gjødsbøl, I. M., & Dam, M. S. (2018). A life worth living: Temporality, care, and personhood in the Danish welfare state. American Ethnologist, 45(1), 20–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Tauber Lab [@TauberLab]. (2020, March 31). Bringing work home just got to a new level. I took my most precious #drosophila strains from my lab at [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/TauberLab/status/1244702488760070152
  70. Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  71. Van Allen, A. (2018). Pinning beetles, biobanking futures: Practices of archiving life in a time of extinction. New Genetics and Society, 37(4), 387–410. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Vaughan, A. (2009, October 14). Kew Gardens hits target for “Noah's Ark” seed bank with a pink banana. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/oct/15/kew-millennium-seed-bank- hits-target
/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.135352
Loading
Lively Stasis. Care and Routine in Living Collections of Flies and Seeds
https://doi.org/10.1484/J.CNT.5.135352
/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.135352
/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.135352
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Care; Laboratory Life; Labour; Liveliness; Living Collections; Stability; Stocks

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv