Skip to content
1882
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0373-6075
  • E-ISSN: 2507-0185
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Cet article étudie un groupe de manuscrits contenant des fragments et des extraits des de Cicéron, certains bien connus des chercheurs (le de Sedulius Scottus ou le florilège d'Hadoard), d'autres inconnus ou sous-étudiés jusqu'ici (deux fragments se trouvant à Berlin et un à Chur/Coira, en Suisse, ainsi qu'un recueil de sentences du e siècle). Il envisage d'abord leur contexte carolingien et les met en rapport avec certaines figures majeures de la philologie carolingienne, comme Loup de Ferrières, Martin de Laon ou Jean Scot, avant d'envisager leur importance pour l'établissement du texte et leurs relations stemmatiques avec les principaux manuscrits des , sur lesquels reposent les éditions modernes de ce texte. Il conclue en étudiant brièvement la manière dont ces manuscrits peuvent enrichir l'histoire de la transmission des textes classiques à l'époque carolingienne.

Abstract

The paper examines a group of manuscripts containing fragments or excerpts from Cicero's , some of which are well known to scholars (Sedulius Scottus's or Hadoardus's collection of Ciceronian philosophical texts), and others hitherto unnoticed (two fragments from Berlin and one from Chur/Coira, in Switzerland, as well as a collection of twelfth-century sentences). It first explores their Carolingian context, associating them with major figures in Carolingian philology such as Lupus de Ferrières, Martin of Laon and John Scot, before considering their importance for the textual criticism of the and their stemmatic relation with the main manuscripts of this text, on which modern editions are based. It concludes briefly by examining how those fragments and excerpts can be used to enrich the history of the transmission of classical literature in the Carolingian era.

© Brepols Publishers NV
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RHT.5.116780
2019-01-01
2025-12-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. C. Auvray-Assayas, Qui est Hadoard? Une réévaluation du manuscrit Reg. lat. 1762 de la Bibliothèque Vaticane, in Revue d’histoire des textes, n. s. 8, 2013, p. 307–338.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. С. W. Barlow, Codex Vaticanus latinus 4929, in Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 15, 1938, p. 87–124.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Beeson, The Collectaneum of Hadoard, in Classical Philology, 40, 1945, p. 201–222.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Beeson, Lupus of Ferrières and Hadoard, in Classical Philology, 43, 1948, p. 190–191.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Billanovitch, Dall’antica Ravenna alle biblioteche umanistiche, in Aevum, 30, 1956, p. 319–353.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Bischoff, Hadoardus and the manuscripts of classical Authors from Corbie, in S. Prete (ed.), Didascaliae. Studies in honor of A. M. Albareda, New York, 1961, p. 39–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Bischoff, Manuscripts and Libraries in the Age of Charlemagne (trad. M. Gorman), Cambridge, 1994.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. A. C. Clark, Review: Dougan’s Tusculan Disputations, in Classical Review 20, 1906, p. 119–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. A. C. Clark, A Bodleian Fragment of Cicero, Tusc. Quaest., in Mélanges Châtelain, Paris, 1910, p. 169–173.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Contreni, The Cathedral School of Laon from 850 to 930: its Manuscripts and Masters, Munich, 1978.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Contreni, Codex Laudunensis 468: A ninth-century Guide to Virgil, Sedulius, and the Liberal Arts, Turnhout, 1984.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Dell’Era, Una caeli descriptio d’età carolingia, Palermo, 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. A. C. Dionisotti, Greek Grammars and Dictionnaries in carolingian Europe, in M. W. Herren (ed.), The sacred Nectar of the Greeks: The Study of Greek in the West in the early Middle Ages, London, 1988, p. 1–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. T. W. Dougan, A Bodleian fragment of Cicero, Tusc. Quaest., in Mélanges Chatelain, Paris, 1910, p. 169–173.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Drexler, Tusculanarum Disputationum libri quinque, Milano, 1964.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. E. S. Duckett, Carolingian portraits, Michigan, 1962.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. C. E. Finch, The Text of Cicero’s De Senectute in Codex Reg. Lat. 1414, in Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 91,1960, p. 76–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Ganz, Corbie in the Carolingian Renaissance, Sigmaringen, 1990.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Giusta, Tusculanae Disputationes, Torino, 1984.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Giusta, Il testo delle ‘Tusculane’, Turin, 1991.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Grillone, Sulla tradizione manoscrita delle Tusculanae Disputationes dal ix al xiii secolo, in Giornale italiano di filologia, 51, 1999, p. 41–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Grillone, Sulla tradizione manoscrita delle Tusculanae Disputationes al xiV secolo, in Rivista de Cultura Classica e Medioevale, 51, 2009, p. 261–267.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Grillone, La tradizione manoscritta delle ‘Tusculanae’ nel secolo XV, in Invigilata lucernis, 33, 2011, p. 97–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Grillone, La tradizione manoscritta delle ‘Tusculanae disputationes’ di Cicerone nei secoli xv-xviii, in Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale, 54, 2012, p. 363–369.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Hellmann, Sedulius Scottus, München, 1906.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Hohl, Reste einer Handschrift des Kollektaneums des Sedulius Scottus in Paris, in Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 69, 1914, p. 580–584.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. H. Le Bourdellès, L’Aratus Latinus. Étude sur la langue et la culture dans le nord de la France au viiie siècle, Lille, 1985.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. W. M. Lindsay, The Archetype Codex of Valerius maximus, in Classical Philology, 4, 1909, p. 113–117.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Lundström, Die Handschriftenklasse Y in der Überlieferung der Tusculanen, in Ciceroniana, 1,1973, p. 3–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Lundström, Zur Textkritik der Tusculanen (Acta Univ. Upsal. Stud. Lat. Upsal. 19), Stockholm, 1986.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. C. E. Lutz, Remigii autissiodorensis Commentum in Martianum Capellam, libri I-II, Leiden, 1962.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. E. Maass, Commentariorum in Aratum reliquiae, Berlin, 1898.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. N. Marinone, I termini estremi del bene e del male. Discussioni tusculane di M. Tullio Cicerone, Torino, 1976.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. P. K. Marshall, Servatus Lupus. Epistulae, Leipzig, 1984.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Moorhead, Aspects of the Carolingian Response to Cicero, in Philologus, 129, 1985, p. 109–120.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. B. Munk Olsen, Les classiques latins dans les florilèges médiévaux antérieurs au xiiie siècle, in Revue d’histoire des textes, 9, 1980, p. 47–121.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. B. Munk Olsen, L’étude des auteurs classiques latins aux xie et xiie siècles. 4.1. La réception de la littérature classique: travaux philologiques, Paris, 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. É. Pellegrin, Les manuscrits de Loup de Ferrières. [À propos du ms. Orléans 162 (139) corrigé de sa main], in Bibliothèque de l’École des Chartes, 115, 1957, p. 5–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. É. Pellegrin, Membra disiecta Floriacensia, in Bibliothèque de l’École des Chartes, 117, 1959, p. 5–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. É. Pellegrin, Les Mss. classiques de la Bibliothèque du Vatican, II.1, Paris, 1978.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Pohlenz, Die Personenbezeichnungen in Ciceros Tusculanen, in Hermes, 48, 1911, p. 627–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. M. Pohlenz, Tusculanae Disputationes, Leipzig, 1918.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. O. Rossbach, De duobus Ciceronis disputationum Tusculanarum codicibus saeculi noni et undecimi ab editoribus neglectis, in Philologus, 63, 1904, p. 94–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. V. Rose, Verzeichniss der lateinischen Handschriften der Königlichen Bibliothek zu Berlin, I. Die Meermann-Handschriften des Sir Thomas Phillipps (Die Handschriften-Verzeichnisse der Königlichen Bibliothek zu berlin 12), Berlin, 1893.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. R. H. Rouse, The Florilegium Angelicum: its Origin, Content and Influence, in Medieval Learning. Essays presented to R. W. Hunt, Oxford, 1976, p. 66–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. R. Schipcke, Die Handschriften des Lupus von Ferrières, in Res publica litterarum, 17, 1994, p. 123–143.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. P. Schwenke, Des Presbyter Hadoardus Cicero-Excerpte, in Philologus, Supplementband 5, 1889, p. 399–588.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. E. von Severus, Lupus von Ferrières. Gestalt und Werke eines Vermittlers antiken Geistesgutes an das Mitelalters im 9. Jahrhundert, Münster, 1940.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. D. Simpson, Sedulii Scotti Collectaneum miscellaneum (Corpus Christianorum. Continuatio Medievalis 67), Turnhout, 1988.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. E. Ströbel, Die Tusculanen im Cod. Vaticanus 3246, in Philologus, 49, 1890, p. 49–64.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.RHT.5.116780
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv