Skip to content
1882
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0373-6075
  • E-ISSN: 2507-0185

Abstract

Abstract

Le problème du rapport généalogique entre les deux témoins du (Wien, ÖNB, 277, ff. 55-73 = A ; et Paris, BNF, lat. 8071 = B) a depuis longtemps suscité un intense débat. Les philologues se sont toujours appuyés sur des collations partielles (limitées à certains textes du florilège), en aboutissent à des conclusions différentes et en oscillant entre deux possibilités : soit B est une copie de A, soit les deux manuscrits remontent à un commun ancêtre aujourd'hui perdu. Un réexamen de cette vieille stemmatique, fondé sur une nouvelle collation du florilège entier et sur des arguments historiques et codicologiques, permet d'établir que B dérive vraisemblablement de A à travers un intermédiaire perdu (ξ), peut-être transcrit par un copiste cultivé, qui aurait occasionnellement corrigé certaines fautes de A. Pour le seul texte de Martial on peut envisager l'hypothèse que ξ ait corrigé quelques erreurs de A à travers une contamination occasionnelle.

Abstract

The stemmatic relationship of the two oldest manuscripts of the (Wien, ÖNB, 277, ff. 55-73 = A ; and 8071 = B) has long been discussed by classical scholars. They have always founded their analysis on partial collations (i.e. limited to single texts of the collection), and have reached different conclusions, so that two solutions are possible : either B is a descendant of A, or they are independent from each other and derive from a lost ancestor. A complete reexamination of this philological , based on fresh collations of all the texts included in the , as well as on historical and codicological arguments, leads to the conclusion that B derives from A through a lost intermediary (ξ), probably written by a learned copyist, who might have occasionally corrected some mistakes of A. As for the text of Martial, it is possible that ξ emended some readings of A by occasional contamination.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RHT.5.116781
2019-01-01
2025-12-07

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. T. Birt, De Halieuticis Ovidio poetae falso adscriptis, Berolini, 1878.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Breitenbach, Die Pseudo-Seneca-Epigramme der Anthologia Vossiana: ein Gedichtbuch aus der mittleren Kaiserzeit, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Capponi, P. Ovidii Nasonis Halieuticon, Leiden, 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. U. Carratello, L’Epigrammaton Liber di Marziale nella tradizione tardo-medievale e umanistica, in Giornale Italiano di Filologia, 5, 1974, p. 117.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. U. Carratello, M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton Liber. Introduzione e testo critico di Ugo Carratello, Genova, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. U. Carratello, Riesame di questioni sull’Epigrammaton liber di Marziale, in Giornale Italiano di Filologia, 41, 1989, p. 273289.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. U. Carratello, Dell’Epigrammaton Liber di Marziale e dei suoi editori, in Giornale Italiano di Filologia, 43, 1991, p. 315328.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Citroni, M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton liber primus. Introduzione, testo, apparato critico e commento, Firenze, 1975.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. K. M. Coleman, M. Valerii Martialis Liber spectaculorum, edited with introduction, translation and commentary by Kathleen M. Coleman, Oxford, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. G. B. Conte, Ope ingenii: esperienze di critica testuale, Pisa, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. B. De Rossi, L. Duchesne, Martyrologium Hieronymianum, ad fidem codicum, adiectis prolegomenis, Bruxellis, 1894.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Ferrari, Spigolature bobbiesi, in Italia Medioevale e Umanistica, 16, 1973, p. 141.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Formicola, Il Cynegeticon di Grattio. Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento a cura di C. Formicola, Bologna, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Fusi, M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton liber tertius. Introduzione, edizione critica, traduzione e commento, Hildesheim-Zürich-New York, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Giangrande, El Thuaneus (Paris. Lat. 8071), el Vindob. 277 y Marcial, in Habis, 32, 2001, p. 253256.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Haupt, Ovidii Halieutica, Gratti et Nemesiani Cynegetica ex recensione Mauricii Hauptii, Lipsiae, 1838.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Heraeus, M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton Libri. Recognovit W. Heraeus, Lipsiae, 1925.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Horsfall, An edition of Grattius, in Classical Review, 39.2, 1989, p. 213214.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. A. E. Housman, Two epigrams of Martial, in Classical Review, 15, 1901, p. 54155.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Jeudy, Le Carmen 111 d’Alcuin et l’anthologie de Martial du manuscrit 522, 502, de la Bibliothèque municipale d’Angers, in S. Krämer, M. Bernhard (ed.), Scire litteras: Forschungen zum mittelalterlichen Geistesleben. Herausgegeben von Sigrid Kramer und Michael Bernhard, München, 1988, p. 221226.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. N. M. Kay, Epigrams from the Anthologia latina: text, translation and commentary, London, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. E. J. Kenney, Magnum opus et tangi nisi cura vincitur impar, in Classical Review, 15, 1965, p. 5558.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. E. J. Kenney, Audacia praeceps, in Classical Review, 25, 1975, p. 217220.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Krusch, Zur Afralegende und zum Martyrologium Hieronymianum. Eine entgegnung, in Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichtskunde, 24, 1899, p. 289337.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. F. W. Lenz, P. Ovidii Nasonis Halieutica, Fragmenta, Nux. Incerti Consolatio ad Liviam edidit Fridericus Waltharius Lenz, Augusta Taurinorum, 1939.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. W. M. Lindsay, The Ancient Editions of Martial, Oxford, 1903.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. W. M. Lindsay, M. Val. Martialis Epigrammata recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit W. M. Lindasy. Editio altera, Oxonii, 1929.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. S. G. Owen, P. Ovidi Nasonis Tristium libri quinque; Ibis; Ex Ponto libri quattuor; Halieutica; Fragmenta, Oxonii, 1915.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Petoletti, Gli epigrammi di Marziale prima dell’umanesimo: manoscritti, fortuna, tradizione, in D. Bianconi (a cura di), Storia della scrittura e altre storie, Roma, 2014, p. 147177.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. M. D. Reeve, Two notes on the medieval tradition of Martial, in Prometheus, 6, 1980, p. 193200.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. J. A. Richmond, The Halieutica ascribed to Ovid; edited by J. A. Richmond, London, 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. J. A. Richmond, Doubtful works ascribed to Ovid, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, t. II.31.4, 1981, p. 2744-2783.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. J. A. Richmond, The relationship of Vindob. 277 and Paris. Lat. 8071, in Philologus, 142.1, 1998, p. 8093.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Riese, F. Bücheler, Anthologia Latina sive poesis Latinae supplementum ediderunt Franciscus Buecheler et Alexander Riese, Lipsiae, 1894-1930.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Russo, Poeti Latini nel Florilegium Thuaneum: genesi e destinazione di un’antologia proto-carolingia, in G. M. Masselli, F. Sivo (a cura di), Il ruolo della Scuola nella tradizione dei classici latini: tra Fortleben ed esegesi, t. I, Foggia, 2017, p. 265297.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. H. Schenkl, Zur Kritik und Überlieferungsgeschichte des Grattius und anderer lateinischer Dichter, in Jahrbücher fur Classische Philologie, Supplementband 24, 1898, p. 383480.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Schiaparelli, Note paleografiche. Intorno all’origine e ai caratteri della scrittura merovingica, in Archivio storico italiano, 16, 1932, p. 169195.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. F. Steffens, Lateinische Paläographie: 125 Tafeln in Lichtdruck, mit gegenüberstehender Transkription nebst Erläuterungen und einer systematischen Darstellung der Entwicklung der lateinischen Schrift von Franz Steffens, Berlin-Leipzig, 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. S. Timpanaro, Recentiores deteriores, codices descripti e codices inutiles, in Filologia e critica, 10, 1985, p. 164192.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. C. Vecce, Iacopo Sannazaro in Francia. Scoperte di codici all’inizio del xvi secolo, Padova, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. J. Velaza, The protohistory of the text of Martial, in J. Velaza (ed.), From the protohistory to the history of the text, Frankfurt am Main, 2016, p. 279294.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. R. Verdière, Gratti Cynegeticon libri I quae supersunt, Wetteren, 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. R. Verdière, Contribution à l’étude paléographique de l’œuvre de Catulle, de l’Halieuticon et du Satyricon, in Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes, 61, 1987, p. 1935.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. J. Vezin, La répartition du travail dans les « scriptoria » carolingiens, in Journal des Savants, 3.1, 1973, p. 212227.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. F. Vollmer, Poetae Latini Minores, vol. 2.1, Ovidi Halieuticon libri I fragmentum; Gratti Cynegeticon libri I fragmentum, Lipsiae, 1911.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. L. Zurli, Intorno ad alcuni carmi dell’«Anthologia Latina», in Giornale Italiano di Filologia, 49, 1997, p. 141176.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. L. Zurli, I codici T ed R di Marziale, in Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica, 129, 2001, p. 5156.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. L. Zurli, La tradizione ms. di Anthologia Latina, Perugia, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. O. Zwierlein, Prolegomena zu einer kritischen Ausgabe der Tragödien Senecas, Wiesbaden, 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. L. Zurli, Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Tragoediae. recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instruxit Otto Zwierlein, Oxonii, 1986.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.RHT.5.116781
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv