Skip to content
1882

Anatomical Debates on Hearts and Brains and Philosophical Issues from Descartes’ Writing of  to its Posthumous Publications

Preview this chapter:

After describing Descartes’ medical library: “Vesalius and the others” and the writing of , I emphasize the importance of anatomical knowledge and of the practice of dissections.

I discuss the gap between and the . I investigate the reasons of such a discrepancy and insist on the crucial moment of late 1632 when Descartes wrote to Mersenne about his dissections of “the heads of various animals” in order “to explain what imagination, memory, etc., consist in.” In the same letter Descartes mentioned his reading of the by Harvey (AT I, 263, CSMK 40) a treatise on the movement of the heart also explaining another fundamental discovery: the circulation of the blood.

The anatomical problems Descartes had to face about hearts and brains provide the key to understanding the evolution of Descartes’ thoughts. They led him to introduce new themes in the and the . The challenge of the motion of the heart shows the entanglement of metaphysical and medical themes. The anatomy of the brain, even more than the anatomy of the heart, has given rise to medical, philosophical, metaphysical and religious considerations and controversies. Descartes’ dissections of hearts and brains led to confront the problem of both the status and the location of the principle of life, and to consider the specificity of the human soul, and to pay attention to the unique mental faculties of imagination, reason and memory. These questions fitted in the framework of the , whose theme Descartes delved into in the , the sixth Meditation, the and the . The was published posthumously with in 1664 in Paris with a Préface (Foreword) by Clerselier and by La Forge.

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/books/10.1484/M.DESCARTES-EB.5.132886
/content/books/10.1484/M.DESCARTES-EB.5.132886
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_serialIdent,pub_author,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv