Skip to content
1882
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2038-3738
  • E-ISSN: 2983-5488

Abstract

Abstract

This paper analyzes the epigram (), contained in 23 Z(urli) (=112 R =101 SB), from the points of view of its style, of its structure and of its . It focuses mainly on the paradoxical nature of its debunking and demythologizing (starring ), conducted on the blade of a demystification which appears ‘acrobatic’ and deliberately absurd. Its mechanism is based on the strategic quote of a passage of the poem (510-511), contained in the . The article also includes two critical digressions on . 18 Z, 47, 48, the source of which is identified in Sil. 12, 89-95 (particularly 95) and on 87-88 Z: the paper’s author acknowledges, beyond the references to the Virgilian model, already detected either by previous scholars, a parodial reversal pertaining to fables that makes implicit reference to the apologue “The hen / goose with the golden eggs” (Avian. 33).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.ALAT.5.130394
2013-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.ALAT.5.130394
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv