Introduction

References

1. Almond G.A., Appleby R.S., Sivan E. (eds) (2003), Strong Religion: The Rise of Fundamentalism around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andrews B. ( 2014), The Making of Modern Chinese Medicine, 1850-1960. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arnold D. ( 2000), Science, Technology, and Medicine in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bartholomew J.R. ( 1993), The Formation of Science in Japan: Building a Research Tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berger P.L. (ed.) (1999), The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Beyer P. ( 2013), “Questioning the Secular/Religious Divide”, International Sociology 28: 663–679.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blancke S., Hjermitslev H.H., Kjaergaard P.C. (eds) (2014), Creationism in Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Borczyk B. ( 2014), “Poland”, inBlancke, Hjermitslev, Kjaergaard 2014, 125–143.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brown C.M. (ed.) (2020), Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism: Evolutionary Theories in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian Cultural Contexts. Cham: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Casanova J. ( 1994), Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chang K. ( 2009), “Creationism, Minus a Young Earth, Emerges in the Islamic World”, New York Times (November 2).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Coleman S., Carlin L. (eds) (2004), The Cultures of Creationism: Anti-Evolutionism in English Speaking Countries. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ecklund E.H., Johnson D.R., Vaidyanathan B., Matthews K.R.W., Lewis S.W., Thomson R.A. Jr., Di D. ( 2019), Secularity and Science: What Scientists around the World Really Think about Religion. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Elman B.A. ( 2005), On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550-1900. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fan F. ( 2004), British Naturalists in Qing China: Science, Empire, and Cultural Encounter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Forrest B., Gross P.R. ( 2004), Creationism's Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Habermas J. ( 2008), “Notes on Post-Secular Society”, New Perspectives Quarterly 25: 17–29.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kumar D. ( 2006), Science and the Raj: A Study of British India, 2nd ed. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Larson E.J. ( 2006), Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Moran J.P. ( 2012), American Genesis: The Evolution Controversies from Scopes to Creation Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Numbers R.L. ( 2006), The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pennock R.T. ( 1999), Tower of Babel: The Evidence against the New Creationism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Prakash G. ( 1999), Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sabra A.I. ( 1996), “Situating Arabic Science: Locality versus Essence”, Isis 87: 654–670.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Shapiro A.R. ( 2013), Trying Biology: The Scopes Trial, Textbooks, and the Antievolution Movement in American Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Taylor C. ( 2007), A Secular Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Thomas S.M. ( 2005), The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]