Organic Memory and the Engram. From Nineteenth-Century Theories to Modern Cognitivism

References

1. Alexander, P. A., & Winne, P. E. (2012). Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anonymous (1896). The Tulane Jambalaya 1896. Nashville, TN: Brandon Printing.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: G. Bells and Sons.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bower, G. H. (2000). A brief history of memory research. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 3–32). New York: Oxford University Press
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bulmer, M. (1999). The development of Francis Galton’s ideas on the mechanism of heredity. Journal of the History of Biology, 32 (2), 263–292.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burnham, W. (1889). Memory, historically and experimentally considered. II. Modern conceptions of memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 2 (2), 225–270.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Churchill, F. B. (1976). Rudolf Virchow and the pathologist’s criteria for the inheritance of acquired characteristics. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 31 (2), 117–148.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Darwin, C. (1868). The variation of animals and plants under domestication. New York: Orange & Judd.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Danziger, K. (2008). Marking the mind: A history of memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eimer, T. (1890). Organic evolution as the result of the inheritance of acquired characters according to the laws of organic growth (T. J. Cunningham, Trans.). London: MacMillan & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Elliott, P. (2003). Erasmus Darwin, Herbert Spencer, and the origins of the evolutionary worldview in British provincial scientific culture. Isis, 94 (1), 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gasser, J. (1988). La notion de mémoire organique dans l’oeuvre de T. Ribot. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 293–313.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66 (3), 325–331.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haeckel, E. (1877). Anthropogenie, oder, Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen: Keimes- und Stammesgeschichte. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hall, B. K. (2002). Palaeontology and evolutionary developmental biology: A science of the nineteenth and twenty-first Centuries. Palaeontology, 45 (4), 647–669.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hering, E. (1905a). On memory and the specific energies of the nervous system. Chicago, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hering, E. (1905b). Über das Gedächtnis als eine allgemeine Funktion der organisierten Materie: Vortrag gehalten in der feierlichen Sitzung der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien am XXX. Mai MDCCCLXX. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Holmes, S. (1944). Recapitulation and its supposed causes. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 19 (4), 319–331.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jensen, L. C., Harris, K., & Anderson, D. C. (1971). Retention following a change in ambient contextual stimuli for six age groups. Developmental Psychology, 4 (3), 460–465.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jensen, P. W. (1855). Versuch einer wissenschaftlichen Begründung der Psychologie. Berlin: Veit & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kennedy, F. (1898). On the experimental investigation of memory. Psychological Review, 5 (5), 477–499.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Hart-court & Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kuhlmann, F. (1906). On the analysis of the memory consciousness: A study in the mental imagery and memory of meaningless visual forms. Psychological review, 13 (5), 316–348.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lechner, H. A., Squire, L. R., & Byrne, J. H. (1999). 100 years of consolidation – Remembering Müller and Pilzecker. Learning & Memory, 6 (2), 77–87.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Mayr, E., & Provine, W. (1980). The Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McGeoch, J. A. (1933). The psychology of human learning: a bibliography. Psychological Bulletin, 30 (1), 1–62.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Murray, D. (1976). Research on human memory in the nineteenth century. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 30 (4), 201–220.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Northway, M. L. (1940). The concept of the ‘schema’. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 31 (1), 22–36.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Orr, H. (1893). A Theory of development and heredity. New York: MacMillan & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Otis, L. (1994). Organic memory: History and the body in the late nineteenth and early twentieth Century. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ribot, T. (1873). L’hérédité: étude psychologique sur ses phénomenes, ses lois, ses causes, ses conséquences. Paris: Librairie Philosophique de Ladrange.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ribot, T. (1894). L’hérédité psychologique. Paris: Alcan.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ribot, T. (1881). Les maladies de la mémoire. Paris: Alcan.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Richards, R. J. (2008). The tragic sense of life: Ernst Haeckel and the struggle over evolutionary thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Romanes, G. J. (1888). Lamarckism versus Darwinism. Nature, 38(413), 490.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schacter, D. L. (1982). Stranger behind the engram. Theories of memory and the psychology of science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schacter, D. L. (2012). Forgotten ideas, neglected pioneers: Richard Semon and the story of memory. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Schacter, D. L., Eich, J. E., & Tulving, E. (1978). Richard Semon’s theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17 (6), 721–743.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Semon, R. (1894). Zoologische Forschungsreisen in Australien und dem Malaysischen Archipel. Jena: Fischer.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Semon, R. (1904). Die Mneme als erhaltendes Prinzip im Wechsel des organischen Geschehens. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Semon, R. (1909). Die mnemischen Empfindungen in ihren Beziehungen zu den Originalempfindungen. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Shanks, D. R. (2007). Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(3), 291–309.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Slamecka, N. J. (1985). Ebbinghaus: Some rejoinders. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Verbal Learning and Cognition, 11(3), 496–500.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Smith, C. U. M. (1982). Evolution and the problem of mind: Part I. Herbert Spencer. Journal of the History of Biology, 15 (1), 55–88.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Spencer, H. (1855). The Principles of Psychology. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Tulving, E. (1964). Intratrial and intertrial retention: Notes towards a theory of free recall verbal learning. Psychological Review, 71 (3), 219–237.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tulving, E. (1976). Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 37–73). London: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Tulving, E., & Osler, S. (1968). Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77 (4), 593–601.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5 (4), 381–391.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Tulving, E. (1967). The effects of presentation and recall of material in free-recall learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6 (2), 175–184.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tulving, E. (1982). Synergistic ecphory in recall and recognition. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 36(2), 130.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Watkins, M. J., Ho, E., & Tulving, E. (1976). Context effects in recognition memory for faces. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15 (5), 505–517.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Ward, J. (1913). Heredity and memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ward, J. (1918). Psychological principles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Zirkle, C. (1935). The inheritance of acquired characters and the provisional hypothesis of pangenesis. American Naturalist (69), 417–445.
    [Google Scholar]