Skip to content
1882
Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1330-7274
  • E-ISSN: 1848-9702

Abstract

Abstract

The question of early medieval renaissance (Justinian, Liutprandean, Carolingian, Ottonian) is based on the possibility of defining any phenomenon of return, even indirect and coherent, to ancient culture as a renaissance. A return to ancient art does not necessarily imply a recovery of the idealized naturalism associated with classical culture. The affirmation of Christianity not only did not erase the forms of pagan art but brought about a regeneration of classical art, that is to say a rebirth intended to create a Christian equivalent to the pagan tradition. An important result of this phenomenon was that the successive returns to the paleo-Christian roots often determined a renaissance without however the necessary implications linked to a conscious re-appropriation of the forms of pagan art. Classical art continued to be considered a reservoir both of materials to be physically appropriated and of models to be re-proposed in new artifacts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.HAM.5.134897
2022-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.HAM.5.134897
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv