oa The Comparative Analysis of Early Cities and Urban Deposits

References

1. Blanton, R. E. and L. F. Fargher. 2008. Collective Action in the Formation of Pre-Modern States (New York: Springer).
   [Google Scholar]
2. Braudel, F. 1980. On History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bunge, M. 2004. ‘How Does It Work? The Search for Explanatory Mechanisms’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34: 182–210.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Caramani, D. 2009. Introduction to the Comparative Method with Boolean Algebra, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, 158 (Los Angeles: Sage).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carneiro, R. L. 1970. ‘A Theory of the Origin of the State’, Science, 169: 733–38.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cesaretti, R. and et al.. 2016. ‘Population-Area Relationship in Medieval European Cities’, PLOS ONE, 11.10: e0162678.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Clarke, D. L. 1978. Analytical Archaeology, 2nd edn (New York: Columbia University Press).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dean, G. 2008. Medieval York (Gloucestershire: The History Press).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dennehy, T., B. W. Stanley, and M. E. Smith. 2016. ‘Social Inequality and Access to Services in Premodern Cities’, in M. Hegmon (ed.), Archaeology of the Human Experience, Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 27 (Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association), pp. 143–60.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Diamond, J. and J. A. Robinson (eds). 2010. Natural Experiments of History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
11. Drennan, R. D. and C. E. Peterson. 2012. ‘Challenges for Comparative Study of Early Complex Societies’, in M. E. Smith (ed.), The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 62–87.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ellen, R. 2010. ‘Theories in Anthropology and “Anthropological Theory”’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16: 387–404.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gerring, J. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gerring, J.. 2012. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grew, R. 1980. ‘The Case for Comparing Histories’, American Historical Review, 85: 763–78.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hansen, M. H. (ed.). 1997. The Polis as an Urban Centre and as a Political Community, Acts of the Copenhagen Polis Centre, 4 (Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hansen, M. H.(ed.). 2000. A Comparative Study of Thirty City-State Cultures (Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hansen, M. H. and T. H. Nielsen (eds). 2005. An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis: An Investigation Conducted by the Copenhagen Polis Centre for the Danish National Research Foundation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Healy, K. 2017. ‘Fuck Nuance’, Sociological Theory, 35: 118–27.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hempel, C. 1955. ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, in P. Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History: Readings from Classical and Contemporary Sources (Glencoe, IL: Free Press), pp. 344–56.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hodder, I. 1999. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction (Oxford: Blackwell).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lazer, D. and A. Friedman. 2007. ‘The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 667–94.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Little, D. 2010. New Contributions to the Philosophy of History (New York: Springer).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Milek, K. B. and H. M. Roberts. 2013. ‘Integrated Geoarchaeological Methods for the Determination of Site Activity Areas: A Study of a Viking Age House in Reykjavik, Iceland’, Journal of Archaeological Science, 40: 1845–65.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Peterson, C. E. and R. D. Drennan. 2012. ‘Patterned Variation in Regional Trajectories of Community Growth’, in M. E. Smith (eds), The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 88–137.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ragin, C. C. 2014. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, 2nd edn (Berkeley: University of California Press).
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rostow, W. W. 1967. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
28. Schofield, J. 2011. London, 1100–1600: The Archaeology of a Capital City, Studies in the Archaeology of Medieval Europe (Sheffield: Equinox).
    [Google Scholar]
29. Searle, J. R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality (New York: Free Press).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Smith, A. T. 2003. The Political Landscape: Constellations of Authority in Early Complex Polities (Berkeley: University of California Press).
    [Google Scholar]
31. Smith, M. E. 2000. ‘Aztec City-States’, in M. H. Hansen (ed.), A Comparative Study of Thirty City-State Cultures (Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters), pp. 581–95.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Smith, M. E.. 2006. ‘How Do Archaeologists Compare Early States? Book Review Essay on Bruce Trigger and Adam T. Smith’, Reviews in Anthropology, 35: 5–35.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Smith, M. E.. 2010. ‘The Archaeological Study of Neighborhoods and Districts in Ancient Cities’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29: 137–54.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Smith, M. E.(ed.). 2012. The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
35. Smith, M. E.. 2015. ‘How Can Archaeologists Make Better Arguments?’, The SAA Archaeological Record, 15.4: 18–23.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Smith, M. E.. 2017. ‘Social Science and Archaeological Inquiry’, Antiquity, 91: 520–28.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Smith, M. E.. 2018. The Importance of a Comparative Perspective in the Study of Ancient Economies, Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsarchäologie, 3 (Bonn: Habelt).
    [Google Scholar]
38. Smith, M. E.. 2020. ‘Definitions and Comparisons in Urban Archaeology’, Journal of Urban Archaeology, 1: 15–30.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Smith, M. E. and P. Peregrine. 2012. ‘Approaches to Comparative Analysis in Archaeology’, in M. E. Smith (ed.), The Comparative Archaeology of Complex Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 4–20.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Smith, M. E. and et al.. 2016. ‘Comparative Methods for Premodern Cities: Coding for Governance and Class Mobility’, Cross-Cultural Research, 50: 415–51.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Stein, J. K. 1993. ‘Scale in Archaeology, Geosciences, and Geoarchaeology’, Geological Society of America Special Papers, 283: 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tilly, C. 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, and Huge Comparisons (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
    [Google Scholar]
43. Tilly, C.. 1985. ‘Retrieving European Lives’, in O. Zunz (ed.), Reliving the Past: The Worlds of Social History (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press), pp. 11–52.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Tilly, C.. 2008. Explaining Social Processes (Boulder: Paradigm).
    [Google Scholar]
45. Trigger, B. G. 2003. Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
46. Turchin, P. and et al.. 2015. ‘Seshat: The Global History Databank’, Cliodynamics: The Journal of Quantitative History and Cultural Evolution, 6: 77–107.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Turchin, P. and et al.. 2018. ‘Quantitative Historical Analysis Uncovers a Single Dimension of Complexity that Structures Global Variation in Human Social Organization’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115: E144–E151.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Weber, M. 1958. The City, trans. by D. Martindale and G. Neuwirth (New York: Free Press).
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wittfogel, K. A. 1957. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power (New Haven: Yale University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
50. Wouters, B. and et al.. 2016. ‘Soil Micromorphology and Urban Research: Early Medieval Antwerp (Belgium) and Viking Age Kaupang (Norway)’, in B. Jervis, L. G. Broderick, and I. G. Sologestoa (eds), Objects, Environment, and Everyday Life in Medieval Europe (Turnhout: Brepols), pp. 279–95.
    [Google Scholar]