oa Towards Romanization 2.0: High-Definition Narratives in the Roman North-West

References

1. Allison, P., M. Pitts, and S. Colley (eds). 2018. Big Data on the Roman Table: New Approaches to Tablewares in the Roman World, Internet Archaeology, 50 <https://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue50/index.html> [accessed 24 September 2020].
2. Biddle, M. 1967. ‘Two Flavian Burials from Grange Road, Winchester’, Antiquaries Journal, 47: 224–50.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bishop, M. 1988. ‘Cavalry Equipment of the Roman Army in the First Century ad’, in J. Coulston (ed.), Military Equipment and the Identity of Roman Soldiers: Proceedings of the Fourth Roman Military Equipment Conference, British Archaeological Reports, International Series, 394 (Oxford: Archaeopress), pp. 67–195.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brulet, R., F. Vilvorder, and R. Delage. 2010. La céramique romaine en Gaule du Nord: dictionnaire des céramiques (Turnhout: Brepols).
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cool, H. and M. Baxter. 2016. ‘Brooches and Britannia’, Britannia, 47: 71–98.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Crummy, P., S. Benfield, N. Crummy, V. Rigby, and D. Shimmin. 2007. Stanway: An Elite Burial Site at Camulodunum, Britannia Monograph, 24 (London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Deru, X. 1996. La céramique belge dans le nord de la Gaule: caractérisation, chronologie, phénomènes culturels et économiques (Louvain-la-Neuve: Département d’archéologie et d’histoire de l’art).
   [Google Scholar]
8. Drury, P. 1978. Excavations at Little Waltham, 1970–71, Council for British Archaeology Research Report, 26 (Chelmsford: Council for British Archaeology).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Feugère, M. 1985. Les fibules de la Gaule méridionale de la conquête à la fin du ve siècle après J.-C., Revue archéologique de Narbonnaise (Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gardner, A. 2003. ‘Seeking a Material Turn: The Artefactuality of the Roman Empire’, in G. Carr, E. Swift, and J. Weekes (eds), TBC 2002: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference (Oxford: Oxbow), pp. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gardner, A. 2017. ‘On Theory-Building in Roman Archaeology’, in A. Van Oyen and M. Pitts (eds), Materialising Roman Histories (Oxford: Oxbow), pp. 203–09.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gerlach, G. 1976. Das gräberfeld ‘Die Motte’ bei Lebach: Katalog (Bonn: Habelt).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gosden, C. 2005. ‘What Do Objects Want?’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 12: 193–211.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hawkes, C. and R. Hull. 1947. Camulodunum: First Report on the Excavations at Colchester, 1930–1939 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hingley, R. 2005. Globalizing Roman Culture: Unity, Diversity and Empire (London: Routledge).
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Koster, A. 2013. The Cemetery of Noviomagus and the Wealthy Burials of the Municipal Elite (Nijmegen: Museum Het Valkhof).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Laurence, R. and F. Trifilò. 2015. ‘The Global and the Local in the Roman Empire: Connectivity and Mobility from an Urban Perspective’, in M. Pitts and M. J. Versluys (eds), Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 99–122.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Loridant, F. and X. Deru. 2009. Bavay: La nécropole gallo-romaine de ‘La Fache des Près Aulnoys’ (Paris: Revue du Nord).
    [Google Scholar]
21. May, T. 1930. Catalogue of the Roman Pottery in the Colchester and Essex Museum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Millett, M. 1986. ‘An Early Cemetery at Alton, Hampshire’, Proceedings of the Hampshire Field Club and Archaeological Society, 42: 43–87.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Millett, M. 1990. ‘Romanization: Historical Issues and Archaeological Interpretation’, in T. Blagg and M. Millett (eds), The Early Roman Empire in the West (Oxford: Oxbow), pp. 35–41.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Müller, G. 1977. Novaesium, vii: Die Römischen Gräberfelder von Novaesium (Berlin: Mann).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Pearce, J. 2015. ‘A “Civilised” Death? The Interpretation of Provincial Roman Grave Good Assemblages’, in R. Brandt, M. Prusac, and H. Roland (eds), Death and Changing Rituals: Function and Meaning in Ancient Funerary Practice (Oxford: Oxbow), pp. 223–47.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Perring, D. 2002. Town and Country in England: Frameworks for Archaeological Research, Council for British Archaeology Research Report, 134 (York: Council for British Archaeology).
    [Google Scholar]
27. Perring, D. and M. Pitts. 2013. Alien Cities: Consumption and the Origins of Urbanism in Roman Britain (London: SpoilHeap).
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pitts, M. 2010. ‘Artefact Suites and Social Practice: An Integrated Approach to Roman Provincial Finds Assemblages’, Facta: A Journal of Roman Material Culture Studies, 4: 125–52.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Pitts, M. 2017a. ‘Deep Histories of Globalization and Europe: Beyond Eurocentrism’, in T. Hodos (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Archaeology and Globalization (London: Routledge), pp. 505–08.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pitts, M. 2017b. ‘Gallo-Belgic Wares: Objects in Motion in the Early Roman West’, in A. Van Oyen and M. Pitts (eds), Materialising Roman Histories (Oxford: Oxbow), pp. 47–64.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pitts, M. 2019. The Roman Object Revolution: Objectscapes and Intra-Cultural Connectivity in Northwest Europe, Amsterdam Archaeological Studies, 27 (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pitts, M. 2020. ‘Globalization, Consumption, and Objects the Roman World: New Perspectives and Opportunities’, in V. Mihajlović and M. Janković (eds), Pervading Empire (Stuttgart: Steiner), pp. 155–66.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pitts, M. and M. J. Versluys. 2015. ‘Globalisation and the Roman World: Perspectives and Opportunities’, in M. Pitts and M. J. Versluys (eds), Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–31.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pitts, M. and M. J. Versluys 2021. ‘Objectscapes: A Manifesto for Investigating the Impacts of Object Flows on Past Societies’, Antiquity <https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.148>.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Robertson, R. 1992. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture (London: Sage).
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schendzielorz, S. 2006. Feulen: Ein spätlatènezeitlich-frührömisches Gräberfeld in Luxemburg (Luxembourg: Musée national d’histoire et d’art).
    [Google Scholar]
37. Stead, I. and V. Rigby. 1989. Verulamium: The King Harry Lane Site (London: Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England).
    [Google Scholar]
38. Swift, E. 2017. Roman Artefacts and Society: Design, Behaviour and Experience (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
39. Van Oyen, A. 2016. How Things Make History: The Roman Empire and its Terra Sigillata Pottery, Amsterdam Archaeological Studies, 23 (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
40. Van Oyen, A. and M. Pitts (eds). 2017. ‘What Did Objects Do in the Roman World? Beyond Representation’, in A. Van Oyen and M. Pitts (eds), Materialising Roman Histories (Oxford: Oxbow), pp. 3–19.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Versluys, M. J. 2014. ‘Understanding Objects in Motion: An Archaeological Dialogue on Romanization’, Archaeological Dialogues, 21: 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Versluys, M. J. 2015. ‘Roman Visual Material Culture as Globalising Koine’, in M. Pitts and M. J. Versluys (eds), Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 141–74.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Versluys, M. J. 2017. ‘Object-Scapes: Towards a Material Constitution of Romanness?’, in A. Van Oyen and M. Pitts (eds), Materialising Roman Histories (Oxford: Oxbow), pp. 191–99.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
45. Woolf, G. 1998. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
46. Woolf, G. 2014. ‘Romanization 2.0 and its Alternatives’, Archaeological Dialogues, 21: 45–50.
    [Google Scholar]