Skip to content
1882
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1379-2547
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9033

Abstract

Abstract

The paper examines Aquinas’s understanding of purely mental objects, i.e. things that have no existence outside the mind but only therein. According to the traditional story, Aquinas’s treatment of purely mental objects is mainly driven by semantic concerns and in particular by the need to explain the reference of terms denoting inexistent objects. The paper tries to counterbalance the traditional picture by showing how inexistent objects can be accommodated within Aquinas’s ontology. More particularly, Aquinas distinguishes different kinds of inexistent objects on the basis of their different extra-mental ground: (I) privations and negations, (II) possible objects and (III) impossible ones.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.102327
2010-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.102327
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv