Skip to content
1882
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1379-2547
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9033

Abstract

Abstract

Which are the philosophical consequences for one’s theory of objects and relations if one posits that every intentional act is correlated with an intentional object? In what follows, I tackle that question in examining the case of Franciscus de Mayronis (d. c. 1326). After suggesting a typology of theories of intentionality distinguishing monadic, relational, and correlational theories, I go on to expose Franciscus’ ontology and his conception of relations. It turns out that Franciscus’ theory of intentionality exemplifies a pattern (also found in the Brentano of 1874) according to which certain epistemic-psychological constraints (to know or to believe always amounts to stand in a certain relation to an object distinct from the mental act) have serious consequences on the ontology.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.102338
2010-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.102338
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv