Skip to content
1882
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1379-2547
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9033

Abstract

Abstract

The view of substance defended by William Ockham and John Buridan in the fourteenth century differs radically from the traditional Aristotelian or Thomistic view of substance. Their metaphysical position of substance not only influences the development of natural philosophy, it also changes the preconditions for cognition and epistemology. In this paper I examine the implications of this view on Buridan’s epistemology and particularly on the compatibility of his view of substance with his claim that we have simple (absolute) substance concepts. I conclude that his metaphysics undermines this claim, but I also offer a suggestion for a possible solution to this problem.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.102340
2010-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.1.102340
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv