Skip to content
1882
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1379-2547
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9033

Abstract

Abstract

Benet Perera was not the first Jesuit to comment Aristotle’s . In Portugal there was already the tradition of doing it, and the so-called Coimbra Course may be seen as the culmination of such a tradition. Moreover, its approach to philosophy is also different from Perera’s. This paper first of all focuses on the place of , the importance physics has in such a science, and the division of metaphysics (according to Perera) or its unity (according to Coimbra). Secondly, it is stated that if Perera could have taken sides with a theological anthropology, Góis (the main author of the Coimbra Course) took a different approach. Lastly, when discussing the immortality of the soul Perera and Álvares (the author of the appendix related to this particular topic) differ over the weight of human capacities in duly evidencing immortality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.103609
2014-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.103609
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv