Skip to content
1882
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1379-2547
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9033

Abstract

Abstract

Giles of Rome maintains that the senses are passive powers and more specifically receptive powers, that is, powers to receive something from sensible objects. The items that the senses receive from sensible objects are (sensible) intentional species of the corresponding sensible forms. This paper deals with Giles’s account of the cognitive role of intentional species in sense perception. The central question is how the intentional species of red received in the eyes is related to the act of seeing a red apple. Is such a species the act itself of seeing a red apple or rather something distinct from the act and causally related to it? And in the latter case, what kind of causality is involved? We shall see that Giles changed his mind on this subject, so that we have an early view and a mature view. His early view (found in his commentary on ) is that the intentional species is distinct from the corresponding sensory act and a cause of it, more precisely a formal cause. His mature view (found in ) is that (i) in the case of the external senses the intentional species is the same as the sensory act itself, whereas (ii) in the case of the internal senses two kinds of intentional species are involved, that is, that which is the same as the sensory act and another one that acts as a proxy for the sensible object.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.122852
2020-01-01
2025-12-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.122852
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv