Skip to content
1882
Volume 20, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1379-2547
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9033

Abstract

Abstract

Does the second writing of the commentary on (dist. 1) by Giles of Rome constitute a break compared to the first writing? The accurate comparison of the problem of the temporal beginning of the world and its treatment - where and take the shape of a commentary on ., VIII, 1 - shows that the presence of Thomas Aquinas is even stronger after 1277. Refusing Aristotle’s and “modern” theologians’ arguments, in in continuity with Giles advocates a philosophical position in favor of the temporal beginning of the world - theoretically possible though not given - as opposed to Thomas’ standard position, but not to his argumentation in o, , 2.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.122854
2020-01-01
2025-12-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.QUAESTIO.5.122854
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv