Skip to content
1882
Volume 43, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2033-6993
  • E-ISSN: 2566-0810

Abstract

Abstract

The fact that James I of Aragón’s (1213-1276) father does not come off particularly well in his autobiographical is known. But how was it possible at all, considered from a contemporary perspective, to criticize the father who did, nonetheless, legitimize the royal power of the son? One explanation lies, as is argued, in the invention of the royal office which allows differentiating between position and person: as successor to the office, the son remained untouched by the personal moral defects of his father. Seen in this way, the idea of royal office made it possible for James to interpret rulership and “self”in contrast to the father, and to record this interpretation in the Finally, this Aragonese concept of royal office and its connections to the “self” is contrasted with other European models of thirteenth-century rulership.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.VIATOR.1.102946
2012-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.VIATOR.1.102946
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv