Skip to content
1882
Volume 44, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0083-5897
  • E-ISSN: 2031-0234

Abstract

Abstract

While the writings about Gerald of Aurillac, especially the , are an invaluable source for the history of the central Middle Ages, their dating and authorship has been erroneous. Odo of Cluny’s authentic work, written ca. 930 (BHL 3412, called the ), is a much more limited version of the , little known to scholars. The more elaborately detailed version (BHL 3411, called the ) as well as additional miracle stories and a sermon for Gerald’s feastday all belong instead to that most infamous forger of the era, Ademar of Chabannes, writing in the 1020s. This conclusion can be made based both on internal and external evidence, including the surprisingly disproportionate inclusion of Limoges and its patron saint Martial in the longer version, its mistaken depiction of Gerald as a count, and its inclusion of wording that seems to anticipate the Peace of God and the trifunctionalism of medieval society. Correcting the dating and authorship of the two versions of the and, in particular, accepting the unreliability of the many details in the longer version, will have far ranging consequences for the history of the central Middle Ages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.VIATOR.1.103340
2013-07-01
2025-12-08

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.VIATOR.1.103340
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv