Skip to content
1882
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1782-7183
  • E-ISSN: 2030-9902

Abstract

Abstract

The word is often explained as deriving from words for ‘abuse’, and the skald would thus have received his name as a ‘defamer’. This paper tests the arguments of that interpretation and arrives at the conclusion that ‘skáld’ is more probably derived from words for ‘sound’: the skald proclaims. Through a discussion of the word the argument is made that the runes could be understood as sounding in a way analogous to the activity of the skald: in an oral society, writing would have been understood as the carrier of voice. The name of one of the most prolific rune carvers, Œpir, has seemed mysterious: why would anyone call himself ‘the screamer’ or ‘the loud-mouth’? In this paper, it is suggested that if the runes were considered as voice carriers, Œpir in the sense of ‘the proclaimer’ would be a congenial signature for a rune carver — or for several carvers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.VMS.1.102139
2010-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.VMS.1.102139
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv