Embedded Polarization in the Fourth Gospel: Overt Pronominal Subjects as a Rhetorical Summons to Take Sides

References

1. Anderson P.N., “From One Dialogue to Another: Johannine Polyvalence from Origins to Receptions”, in Thatcher - Moore (ed.), Anatomies, 93-119.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson P.N. - Just F. - Thatcher T. (ed.), John, Jesus, and History. I: Critical Appraisals of Critical Views (SBL Symposium Series 44), Atlanta GA 2007.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ashton J., ‘The Identity and Function of the ’Ioυδαῖoι in the Fourth Gospel”, NovT 27 (1984) 40-75.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Ashton J., Understanding the Fourth Gospel, Oxford (1991) 2007².
   [Google Scholar]
5. Asiedu-Peprah M., Johannine Sabbath Conflicts as Juridical Controversy? An Exegetical Study of John 5 and 9: 1-10:21(WUNT II/132), Tübingen 2001.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Attridge H.W., “Genre Bending in the Fourth Gospel”, JBL 121 (2002) 3-21.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Baltazani M., “Pragmatics, Intonation and Word order in Greek”, Interfaces Prosodiques (2003), Pré-actes, 14-19.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Baltazani M. - Jun S.-A., “Focus and Topic Intonation in Greek”, in Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco CA 1999, 1305-1308.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Barrett C.K., The Gospel According to St. John: An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text, Philadelphia PA (1955) 1978².
   [Google Scholar]
10. Barus B., “John 2: 12-25:A Narrative Reading”, in Lozada - Thatcher (ed.), New Currents, 123-140.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bekken P.J., The Lawsuit Motif in John’s Gospel from New Perspectives (NovT SS 158), Leiden 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Beutler J. - Fortna R.T., “Introduction”, in Idd. (ed.), The Shepherd Discourse of John 10 and its Context (SNTS MS 67), Cambridge 1991, 1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Black D.A. - Cerone J.N. (ed.), The Pericope of the Adulteress in Contemporary Research (LNTS 551), London 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Black S.L., Sentence Conjunctions in the Gospel of Matthew (JSNT SS 216/SNTG 9), Sheffield 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Blass F. - Debrunner A., A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, Chicago IL 1961.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Boomershine T.E., ‘The Medium and Message of John: Audience Address and Audience Identity in the Fourth Gospel”, in Le Donne - Thatcher (ed.), The Fourth Gospel, 92-120.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Brickle J.E., “Seeing, Hearing, Declaring, Writing: Media Dynamics in the Letters of John”, in Le Donne - Thatcher (ed.), The Fourth Gospel, 11-28.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Brodie T.L., ‘Three Revolutions, a Funeral, and Glimmers of a Challenging Dawn”, in Thatcher (ed.), What We Have Heard, 63-82.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Brown R.E., The Gospel According to John: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. I: I-XII (AB 29), Garden City NY 1966.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Bultmann R., The Gospel of John: A Commentary, Philadelphia PA 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Carson D.A., “Understanding Misunderstandings in the Fourth Gospel”, TynBull 33 (1982) 59-91.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Carson D.A., “The Purpose of the Fourth Gospel: John 20:31 Reconsidered”, JBL 106/4 (1987) 639-651.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Carson D.A., “The Challenge of the Balkanization of Johannine Studies”, in Anderson et al. (ed.), John, I, 133-164.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Colwell E.C., The Greek of the Fourth Gospel: A Study of its Aramaisms in the Light of Hellenistic Greek, Eugene OR (1931) 2011 reprint.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Culpepper R.A., Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design (Foundations and Facets: NT), Philadelphia PA 1983.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Davies M., Rhetoric and Reference in the Fourth Gospel (JSNT SS 69), Sheffield 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
27. de Jonge M., “The Gospel and the Epistles of John Read against the Background of the History of the Johannine Communities”, in Thatcher (ed.), What We Have Heard, 127-144.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Devine A.M. - Stephens L.D., The Prosody of Greek Speech, New York 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dodd C.H., Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel, Cambridge 1968.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Dvorak J.D., The Interpersonal Metafunction in I Corinthians 1-4: The Tenor of Toughness (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, McMaster Divinity College 2012, available online).
    [Google Scholar]
31. Edwards J.A., “Markan Sandwiches: The Significance of Interpolations in Markan Narratives”, NovT 31/3 (1989) 193-216.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Felton T. - Thatcher T., “Stylometry and the Signs Gospel”, in Fortna - Thatcher (ed.), Jesus, 209-218.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Foley T.S., Biblical Translation in Chinese and Greek: Verbal Aspect in Theory and Practice (LBS 1), Leiden 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Fortna R.T.- Thatcher T. (ed.), Jesus in Johannine Tradition, Louisville KY - London 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Halliday M.A.K., “Anti-Languages”, American Anthropologist New Series 78/3 (1976) 570-584.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Halliday M.A.K., Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London 1978.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Halliday M.A.K., Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (revised by C.M.I.M Matthiessen), London (1985) 2014⁴.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Harvey A.E., Jesus on Trial: A Study in the Fourth Gospel, London 1976.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Keener C.S., The Gospel of John: A Commentary, I, Grand Rapids MI 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Klink E.W., III, The Sheep of the Fold: The Audience and Origin of the Gospel of John (SNTS MS 141), Cambridge 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Klink E.W., III, “Expulsion from the Synagogue? Rethinking a Johannine Anachronism”, TynBull 59 (2008) 99-118.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Koester C.R., “The Spectrum of Johannine Readers”, in F.F. Segovia (ed.), What is John? Readers and Readings in the Fourth Gospel (SBL Symposium Series 3), Atlanta GA 1996, 5-19.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kysar R., Voyages with John: Charting the Fourth Gospel, Waco TX 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kysar R., ‘The Whence and Whither of the Johannine Community”, in J.R. Donahue (ed.), Life in Abundance: Studies of John’s Gospel in Tribute to Raymond E. Brown, S.S., Collegeville MN 2005, 65-81.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Kysar R., “What is the Meaning of This?—Reflections Upon a Life and Career”, in Thatcher (ed.) What We Have Heard, 163-178.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Kysar R. (with T. Thatcher), “John Is Dead; Long Live John!”, in Thatcher - Moore (ed.), Anatomies, 137-146.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Kwong I.S.Ch., The Word Order of the Gospel of Luke: Its Foregrounded Messages (LNTS 298), London 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Lamb D.A., Text, Context and the Johannine Community: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Johannine Writings (LNTS 477), London - New York 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Land C.D., “Varieties of Greek”, in S.E. Porter - A. Pitts (ed.), The Language of the New Testament: Context, History and Development (LBS 6), Leiden 2012, 243-260.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Le Donne A. - Thatcher T. (ed.), The Fourth Gospel in First-Century Media Culture (LNTS 426), London 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Le Donne A. - Thatcher T., “Introducing Media Culture to Johannine Studies: Orality, Performance and Memory”, in Idd. (ed.), The Fourth Gospel, 1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Lee J.H., Paul’s Gospel in Romans: A Discourse Analysis of Rom 1: 16-8:39(LBS 3), Leiden 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Lee D.A., The Symbolic Narratives of the Fourth Gospel (JSNT SS 95), Sheffield 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Lincoln A.T., Truth on Trial: The Lawsuit Motif in the Fourth Gospel, Grand Rapids MI 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Lincoln A.T., “A Life of Jesus as Testimony: The Divine Courtroom and the Gospel of John”, in A. Mermelstein - S.E. Holtz (ed.), The Divine Courtroom in Comparative Perspective (BIS 132), Leiden 2015, 145-166.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Lozada F., Jr. - Thatcher T. (ed.), New Currents Through John: A Global Perspective (RSB 54), Atlanta GA 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Malina B.J., “The Gospel of John in Sociolinguistic Perspective”, in Center for Hermeneutical Studies in Hellenistic and Modern Culture: Protocol of the Forty-Eighth Colloquy, 11 March 1984 (Colloquy 48), Berkeley CA 1985, 1-23.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Martín-Asensio G., Transitivity-Based Foregrounding in the Acts of the Apostles: A Functional-Grammatical Approach to the Lukan Perspective (JSNT SS 202/SNTG 8), Sheffield 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Martín-Asensio G., “Procedural Register in the Olivet Discourse: A Functional Linguistic Approach to Mark 13”, Bib 90/4 (2009) 457-483.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Martyn J.L., History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel (NTL), Louisville KY (1968) 2003³.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Mavrogiorgos M., Clitics in Greek: A Minimalist Account of Proclisis and Enclisis, Amsterdam 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Meeks W., “The Man from Heaven in Johannine Sectarianism”, JBL 91 (1972) 44-72.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Meeks W., “Reflections on an Era”, in Id., In Search of the Early Christians: Selected Essays (ed. A.R. Hilton - H.G. Snyder), New Haven CT 2002, xi-xxviii.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Metzger B.M., A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, London 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Neyrey J.H., An Ideology of Revolt: John’s Christology in Social-Scientific Perspective, Philadelphia PA 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Neyrey J.H., “In Conclusion… John 12 as a Rhetorical Peroratio”, BTB 37/3 (2007) 101-113.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Neyrey J.H., The Gospel of John in Cultural and Rhetorical Perspective, Grand Rapids MI 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
68. O’Donnell M.B., “Linguistic Fingerprints or Style by Numbers? The Use of Statistics in the Discussion of Authorship of New Testament Documents”, in S.E. Porter - D.A. Carson (ed.), Linguistics and the New Testament (JSNT SS 168/SNTG 5), Sheffield 1999, 206-254.
    [Google Scholar]
69. O’Donnell M.B., “Designing and Compiling a Register-Balanced Corpus of Hellenistic Greek for the Purpose of Linguistic Description and Investigation”, in S.E. Porter (ed.), Diglossia and Other Topics in New Testament Linguistics (JSNT SS 193/SNTG 6), Sheffield 2000, 255-297.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Ong H.T., The Multilingual Jesus and the Sociolinguistic World of the New Testament (LBS 12), Leiden 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Pang F.G.H., Revisiting Aspect and Aktionsart (LBS 14), Leiden 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Parsenios H.L., Departure and Consolation: The Johannine Farewell Discourses in Light of Greco-Roman Literature (NovT SS 117), Leiden 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Parsenios G.L., Rhetoric and Drama in the Johannine Lawsuit Motif (WUNT 258), Tubingen 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Pavlidou T.-S., “Collective Aspects of Subjectivity: The Subject Pronoun (‘we’) in Modern Greek”, in N. Baumgarten et al. (ed.), Subjectivity in Language and in Discourse, Bingley 2012, 33-65.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Peters R.D., The Greek Article: A Functional Grammar of o-Items in the Greek New Testament with Special Emphasis on the Greek Article (LBS 9), Leiden 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Pitts A., I Peter: A Linguistic Commentary (Leiden, forthcoming).
    [Google Scholar]
77. Porter S.E., Idioms of the Greek New Testament (BLG 2), Sheffield 19942.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Porter S.E., “Dialect and Register in the Greek of the New Testament: Theory”, in M.D. Carroll R. (ed.), Rethinking Contexts, Rereading Texts: Contributions from the Social Sciences to Biblical Interpretation (JSOT SS 299), Sheffield 2000, 190-208.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Porter S.E., Linguistic Analysis of the Greek New Testament: Studies in Tools, Methods, and Practice, Grand Rapids MI 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Porter S.E. - Ong H.T. (ed.), The Origins of John’s Gospel (Johannine Studies 2), Leiden 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Prentza A. - Tsimpli I.-M., “Resolution of Pronominal Ambiguity in Greek: Syntax and Pragmatics”, Studies in Greek Linguistics 33 (2013) 197-208.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Punch J.D., “The Piously Offensive Pericope Adulterae”, in Black - Cerone (ed.), The Pericope of the Adulteress, 7-32.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Recht T., “The Discourse Functions of Verb Initial Clauses in Classical Greek”, Proceedings of the 25th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference (2015).
    [Google Scholar]
84. Reed J.T., A Discourse Analysis of Philippians: Method and Rhetoric in the Debate over Literary Integrity (JSNT SS 136), Sheffield 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Reinhartz A., “Building Skyscrapers on Toothpicks: The Literary-Critical Challenge to Historical Criticism”, in Thatcher - Moore (ed.), Anatomies, 55-76.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Robertson A.T., A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research, New York (1914) 1919³.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Sánchez Navarro L., “Estructura testimonial del Evangelio de Juan”, Bib 86/4(2005) 511-528.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Schnackenburg R., The Gospel According to John (HTCNT), I, London 1968.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Schweizer E., Ego Eimi: Die religionsgeschichtliche Herkunft und theologische Bedeutung der johanneischen Bildreden, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Quellenfrage des vierten Evangeliums (FRLANT N.F. 38), Gottingen 1939.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Smith D.M., The Composition and Order of the Fourth Gospel: Bultmann’s Literary Theory (The Johannine Monograph Series 2), Eugene OR (1965) 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Stibbe M.W.G., The Gospel of John as Literature, Leiden 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Stibbe M.W.G., John’s Gospel (NTR), London 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Stovell B.M., Mapping Metaphorical Discourse in the Fourth Gospel (LBS 5), Leiden 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Thatcher T., “Conclusion: New Directions”, in Fortna - Thatcher (ed.), Jesus, 353-358.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Thatcher T., “The New Current through John: The Old ‘New Look’ and the New Critical Orthodoxy”, in Lozada - Thatcher (ed.), New Currents, 1-26.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Thatcher T. (ed.), What We Have Heard from the Beginning: The Past, Present, and Future of Johannine Studies, Waco TX 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Thatcher T., “Preface: The Purpose and Plan of This Book”, in Id. (ed.), What We Have Heard, xv-xix.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Thatcher T., “Anatomies of the Fourth Gospel: Past, Present, and Future Probes”, in Thatcher - Moore (ed.), Anatomies, 1-35.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Thatcher T. - Moore S.D. (ed.), Anatomies of Narrative Criticism: The Past, Present, and Futures of the Fourth Gospel as Literature (RBS 55), Atlanta GA 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Thomaskutty J., Dialogue in the Book of Signs (BIS 136), Leiden 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Timmins N.G., “Variation in Style in the Johannine Literature”, JSNT 16/no. 53 (1994) 47-64.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Turner T., A Grammar of New Testament Greek. IV: Style, Edinburgh 1976.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Verheyden J., “The De-Johannification of Jesus: The Revisionist Contribution of Some Nineteenth-Century German Scholarship”, in Anderson et al. (ed.), John, I, 109-120.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Westfall C.L., Discourse Analysis of the Letter to the Hebrews: Relationship Between Form and Meaning (LNTS 297), London 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Willker W., An Online Textual Commentary on the Greek Gospels http://www.willker.de/wie/TCG/TC-John.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Xue X.E., Paul’s Viewpoint on God, Israel, and the Gentiles in Romans 9-11: An Intertextual Thematic Analysis, London 2015.
     [Google Scholar]