Skip to content
1882
Volume 66, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0081-8933
  • E-ISSN: 2507-0428

Abstract

Abstract

This contribution retraces the first stages of the reception of the figure and the writings of the Apostle Paul. Starting from the New Testament texts, we realize that Paul has provoked different reactions: some have lauded the apostle (Acts of the Apostles and the Pastoral Letters), others seem to have ignored his existence (Johannine literature), yet others contest with much controversy his letters, despite being considered normative (2 Peter). Such a variety of opinions continues through the 2nd century with the Marcionites and Gnostics who exalt Paul, apologists such as Justin who ignore him and still those who, like the author of the pseudoclementine letters, consider Paul an enemy of the faith. In the latin-speaking world, Paul will be considered an example to imitate and a source of theological inspiration especially towards the end of the 4th century. Special attention is given to Irenaeus, who tries to find a harmony between such diverse attitudes toward Paul. He transmits as a legacy not only texts and examples but also criteria for discerning what is authentically apostolic.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.LA.4.2018011
2016-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abramowski L., “Die »Erinnerungen der Apostel« bei Justin”, in P. Stuhlmacher (ed.), Das Evangelium und die Evangelien. Vorträge vom Tübingenr Symposium 1982 (WUNT 28), Tübingen 1983, 341-353.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aland K., ““Methodische Bemerkungen zum Corpus Paulinum bei den Kirchenvätern des zweitens Jahrhunderts”, in Ritter (ed.), Kerygma, 29-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atti dei Martiri. Introduzione, traduzione e note di G. Caldarelli, Milano 1985.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Attridge H.W., “Epistle to the Hebrews”, in D. Freedman (ed.), The Anchor Bible Dictionary, III, New York 1992, 97-105.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayres L., “Augustine”, in Westerholm (ed.), The Blackwell Companion, 345-360.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bain A.M., “Tertullian: Paul as Teacher of the Gentile Churches”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 207-225.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Balás D.L., ““Marcion Revisited: A ‘Post-Harnack’ Perspective”, in W.E. March (ed.), Text and Testaments. Critical Essays on the Bible and Early Church Fathers, San Antonio TX 1980, 95-108.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Barbaglio G., La Teologia di Paolo. Abbozzi in forma epistolare, Bologna 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Barrett C.K., “Pauline Controversies in the Post-Pauline Period”, NTS 20 (1974) 229-245.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauer W., Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum (BHTh 10), ed. G. Strecker, Tübingen 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Baur F.C., Paul, the Apostle of Jesus Christ. His Life and Works, His Epistles and Teachings. Two Volumes in One, Peabody MA 2003 (orig. tedesco: Stuttgart 1845).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Berding K., Polycarp and Paul. An Analysis of their Literary and Theological Relationship in Light of Polycarp’s Use of Biblical and Extra-Biblical Literature (Suppl. to VigChr 62), Leiden etc. 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bianchi U., “Marcion: Théologie biblique ou docteur gnostique?”, VigChr 21 (1967) 141-149.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bienert W.A., ““Markion - Christentum als Antithese zum Judentum”, in H. Frohnhofen (ed.), Christlicher Antijudaismus und jüdischer Antipaganismus. Ihre Motive und Hintergrunde in den ersten drei Jahrhunderten (Hamburger theologische Studien 3), Hamburg 1990, 139-144.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bingham D.J., “The Bishop in the Mirror. Scripture and Irenaeus’s Self-Understanding in Adversus haereses Book-One”, in R.J. Rombs - A.Y. Hwang (ed.), Tradition and the Rule of Faith in the Early Church, Washington D.C. 2010, 48-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bird M.F. - Dodson J.R. (ed.), Paul and the Second Century (LNTS 412), London - New York 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Blackwell B.C., “Paul and Irenaeus”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 190-206.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bocciolini Palagi L., ““Lettere apocrife. La corrispondenza di Seneca e San Paolo e altri epistolari: fra romanzo e letteratura pseudo-epigrafa”, in A. Lenzuni (ed.), Apocrifi del Nuovo Testamento, Bologna 2004, 131-154.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brennecke H.C., “Die Anfänge einer Paulusverehrung”, in E. Becker - P. Pilhofer (ed.), Biographie und Persönlichkeit des Paulus (WUNT 187), Tübingen 2005, 295-305.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Bruce F.F., Il Canone delle Scritture, Chieti - Roma 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Campenhausen H.F. von, Kirchliches Amt und geistliche Vollmacht in den ersten drei Jahrhunderten (BHTh 14), Tübingen 19632.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Campenhausen H.F. vonPolycarp von Smyrna und die Pastoralbriefe” [1951], in Id., Aus der Frühzeit des Christentums. Studien zur Kichengeschichte des ersten und zweiten Jahrhunderts, Tübingen 1963, 197-252.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Campenhausen H.F. vonMarcion et les origines du Canon Néotestamentaire”, RHPhR 46 (1966) 213-226.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Campenhausen H.F. von Die Entstehung der christlichen Bibel (BHTh 39), Tübingen 1968.
  25. Cirillo L., “L’antipaolinismo nelle Pseudoclementine”, RSB 1 (1989) 121-137.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cirillo L.L’antipaolinismo nelle Pseudoclementine. Un riesame della questione”, in G. Filoramo - C. Gianotto (ed.), Verus Israel. Nuove prospettive sul giudeocristianesimo. Atti del Colloquio di Torino (4-5 novembre 1999), Brescia 2001, 280-303.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Clement d’Alexandrie, Extraits de Théodote. Texte grec, introduction, traduction et notes de F. Sagnard (SCh 23), Paris 1948.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Cocchini F., Il Paolo di Origene. Contributo alla storia della recezione delle epistole paoline nel III secolo (Verba seniorum 11), Roma 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cocchini F.Aspetti del paolinismo origeniano”, in Gieniusz (ed.), Paolo di Tarso, 201-216.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Crouzel H., “Origène et la connaisance mystique”, in Studia Patristica V, 270-276.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Daley B.E., “Saint Paul and the Fourth-Century Fathers: Portraits of Christian Life”, Pro Ecclesia 18 (2009) 299-317.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Dassmann E., Der Stachel im Fleisch. Paulus in der frühchristlichen Literatur bis Irenäus, Münster 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Dassmann E.Paulus in der Gnosis”, JAC 22 (1979) 123-138.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dehandshutter B., “Le Martyre de Polycarpe et le développement de la conception du martyre au deuxième siècle”, in Studia Patristica XVII, 659-668.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dehandshutter BLeben und/oder sterben für Gott bei Ignatius und Polykarp”, in Fuhrmann - Grundmann (ed.), Martyriumsvorstellungen, 191-202.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Dettwiler A., “Auctoritas Pauli selon la littérature deutéro-paulinienne et l’œuvre lucanienne”, in Marguerat (ed.), Reception, 305-323.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Eastman D.L., Paul the Martyr. The Cult of the Apostle in the Latin West (Writings from the Greco-Roman World Supplements 4), Atlanta GA 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Eastman D.L.Ignatius, Pseudo-Ignatius, and the Art of Pauline Reception”, Early Christianity 7 (2016) 213-229.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Elliott M.W., ‘The Triumph of Paulinism by the Mid-Third Century”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 244-256.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Erbetta M., Gli Apocrifi del Nuovo Testamento. Lettere e Apocalissi, Torino 1969.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Erdt W., Marius Victorinus Afer, der erste lateinische Pauluskommentator. Studien zu seinen Pauluskommentaren im Zusammenhang der Wiederentdeckung des Paulus in der abendlandischen Theologie des 4. Jahrhunderts (EH XXIII/135), Frankfurt a.M. etc. 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ferguson E., “Tertullian, Scripture, Rule of Faith, and Paul”, in Still - Wilhite (ed.), Tertullian, 22-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Foster P., “Justin and Paul”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 108-125.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fredriksen P., “Paolo”, in A. Fitzgerald (ed.), Dizionario di Agostino, Roma 2007, 1052-1059.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Frey J., “Von Paulus zu Johannes. Die Diversitat ״christlicher“ Gemeindekreise und die ״Trennungsprozesse“ zwischen der Synagoge und den Gemeinden der Jesusna- chfolger in Ephesus im ersten Jahrhundert”, in C.K. Rothschild - J. Schröter (ed.), The Rise and Expansion of Christianity in the First Three Centuries of the Common Era (WUNT 301), Tübingen 2013, 235-278.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Fuhrmann S. - Grundmann R. (ed.), Martyriumsvorstellungen in Antike und Mittelalter. Leben oder sterben für Gott? (AJEC 80), Leiden etc. 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gieniusz A. (ed.), Paolo di Tarso. Figura, opera, ricezione, Città del Vaticano 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Girolamo di Stridone, Commento alla lettera agli Efesini - Commento alla lettera a Tito. Introduzione e traduzione di D. Tessore (Collana di Testi Patristici 211), Roma 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Grappone A., “Girolamo e l’epistolario tra Seneca e San Paolo”, Augustinianum 50 (2010) 119-145.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Grant R.M., “The Bible of Theophilus of Antioch”, JBL 66 (1947) 173-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Grech P., “Note sull’antipaolinismo nei Padri”, RSB 1 (1989) 93-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Gregory A.F., The Reception of Luke and Acts in the Period before Irenaeus (WUNT II/169), Tübingen 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Haacker K., “Rezeptionsgeschichte und Literarkritik. Anfragen an die communis opinio zum Corpus Paulinum”, ThZ 65 (2009) 209-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Hall C.A., “Chrysostom”, in Westerholm (ed.), The Blackwell Companion, 330-344.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hammond Bammel C.P., “Rufinus’ Translation of Origen’s Commentary on Romans and the Pelagian Controversy”, in Storia ed esegesi in Rufino di Concordia (Anti-chita Altoadriatiche 39), Udine 1992, 131-149.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Hannah D.D., “The Ravenous Wolf: The Apostle Paul and Genesis 49.27 in the Early Church”, NTS 62 (2016) 610-627.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Harnack A. von, Marcion: Das Evangelium vom Fremden Gott. Eine Monographie zur Geschichte der Grundlegung der katholischen Kirche (TU 45), Leipzig 19242.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Hartog P., “The ‘Rule of Faith’ and Patristic Biblical Exegesis”, Trinity Journal 28 (2007) 65-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Heiser A., Die Paulusinszenierung des Johannes Chrysostomus. Epitheta und ihre Vorgeschichte (Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 70), Tübingen 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Holmes M.W., “Paul and Polycarp”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 57-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Hoppe R. - Reichardt M. (ed.), Lukas - Paulus - Pastoralbriefe (StBS 230), Stuttgart 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Hornschuh M., Studien zur Epistula Apostolorum (Patristische Texte und Studien 5), Berlin 1965.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Klumbies P.-G. - du Toit D.S. (ed.), Paulus - Werk und Wirkung. Festschrift für Andreas Lindemann zum 70. Geburtstag, Tübingen 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Knox J., Marcion and the New Testament. An Essay in the Early History of the Canon, Chicago 1942.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Kovacs J., “Saint Paul as Apostle of Apatheia: Stromateis VII, Chapter 14”, in M. Havrda et al. (ed.), The Seventh Book of the Stromateis. Proceedings of the Colloquium on Clement of Alexandria (Olomouc, October 21-23,2010) (Suppl. to VigChr 117), Leiden - Boston 2012, 199-216.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Le Boulluec A., “De Paul à Origène: continuité ou divergence?”, in G. Dahan - R. Goulet (ed.), Allégorie des poètes. Allégorie des philosophes. Études sur la poétique et l’herméneutique de l’allégorie de l’Antiquité à la Réforme, Paris 2005, 113-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Legasse S., L’antipaulinisme sectaire au temps des Pères de l’Eglise (Cahiers de la RB 47), Paris 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Leppä H., “Were Paul’s Letters Buried in Obscurity During the Writing of Acts?”, in Liljeström (ed.), The Early Reception, 76-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Lieu J.M., “ ‘As much my apostle as Christ is mine’: The Dispute over Paul between Tertullian and Marcion”, Early Christianity 1 (2010) 41-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Lieu J.M.The Battle for Paul in the Second Century”, IrTQ 75 (2010) 3-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Liljestrom K. (ed.), The Early Reception of Paul (Publications of the FES 99), Helsinki 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Lincicum D., “Teaming Scripture in the School of Paul. From Ephesians to Justin”, in Liljeström (ed.), The Early Reception, 148-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Lindemann A., Paulus im altesten Christentum. Das Bild des Apostels und die Rezeption der paulinischen Theologie in der fruhchristlichen Literatur bis Marcion (BHTh 58), Tübingen 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Lindemann A.Der Apostel Paulus im 2. Jahrhundert”, in J.-M. Sevrin (ed.), The New Testament in Early Christianity. La réception des écrits néotestamentaires dans le christianisme primitif (BETL 86), Leuven 1989, 39-67.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Lindemann A.Die Sammlung der Paulusbriefe im 1. und 2. Jahrhundert”, in J. Auwers - M. De Jonge (ed.), The Biblical Canons (BETL 163), Leuven 2003, 321-351.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Löhr H., “Paulus als Vorbild des Sterbens im frühen Christentum”, in Fuhrmann - Grundmann (ed.), Martyriumsvorstellungen, 149-165.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Lohse B., ““Beobachtungen zum Paulus-Kommentar des Marius Victorinus und zur Wie- derentdeckung des Paulus in der lateinischen Theologie des vierten Jahrhunderts”, in Ritter (ed.), Kerygma, 351-366.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Lüdemann G., Opposition to Paul in Jewish Christianity, Minneapolis MN 1989 (orig. tedesco: Paulus, der Heidenapostel. II: Antipaulinismus in frühen Christentum [FR-LANT 130], Göttingen 1983).
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Malina B.J. - Neyrey J.H., Ritratti di Paolo. Archeologia della personalità antica, Brescia 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Manns F., “Les pseudo-clémentines (Homélies et Reconnaissances). Etat de la question”, LA 53 (2003) 157-184.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Mara M.G., Paolo di Tarso e il suo epistolario. Ricerche storico-esegetiche, L’Aquila 1983.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Mara M.G. Agostino interprete di Paolo. Commento di alcune questioni tratte dalla Lettera ai Romani. Commento incompiuto della Lettera ai Romani (Letture cristiane del primo millennio 16), Milano 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Marguerat D., “Des «canons» avant le canon?”, in P.S. Alexander - J.-D. Kaestli (ed.), The Canon of Scripture in Jewish and Christian Tradition (Publications de l’Institut romand des sciences bibliques 4), Lausanne 2007, 155-168.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Marguerat D.Paul après Paul: une histoire de réception”, NTS 54 (2008) 317-337.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Marguerat D. (ed.), Reception of Paulinism in Acts. Réception du Paulinisme dans les Actes des Apôtres (BETL 229), Leuven etc. 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Marin M., “Note introduttive sulla presenza di Paolo nel Dialogo con Trifone di Giustino”, ASE 3 (1986) 71-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Mario Vittorino, Commentari alle epistole di Paolo agli Efesini, ai Galati, ai Filippesi (Corona Patrum 8), Torino 1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. McDonald L.M., The Biblical Canon. Its Origin, Transmission, and Authority, Peabody MA 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Méhat A., “Ebrei”, in Dizionario enciclopedico della Bibbia, Roma 1995, 443-445.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Mendoza Ríos M., “L’esegesi agostiniana e la lettura di Paolo nel IV secolo”, in Agostino lettore e interprete di Paolo: Lectio Augustini XX, Settimana Agostiniana Pavese (2004) (Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum 107), Roma 2008, 95-115.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Mitchell M.M., “A Patristic Perspective on Pauline”, NTS 47 (2001) 354-371.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Moessner D.P. et al. (ed.), Paul and the Heritage of Israel. Paul’s Claim upon Israel’s Legacy in Luke and Acts in the Light of the Pauline Letters (LNTS 452), London - New York 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Mount C., “Paul’s Place in Early Christianity”, in Moessner et al. (ed.), Paul, 90-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Moraldi L., Apocrifi del Nuovo Testamento, III, Casale Monferrato 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Moss C.R., The Ancient Christian Martyrdom. Diverse Practices, Theologies, and Traditions, New Haven - London 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Müller-Fieberg R., “Paulusrezeption in der Johannesoffenbarung? Auf der Suche nach dem Erbe des Apostels im letzten Buch des biblischen Kanons”, NTS 55 (2009) 83-109.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Nautin P., “Irénée et la canonicité des épîtres pauliniennes”, RHR 182 (1972) 113-130.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Niebuhr K.-W., “»Judentum« und »Christentum« bei Paulus und Ignatius von Antiochien”, ZNW 85 (1994) 218-233.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Nielsen C.M., ‘Polycarp, Paul and the Scriptures”, ATR 47 (1965) 85-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Noorman R., Irenäus als Paulusinterpret. Zur Rezeption und Wirkung der paulinischen und deuteropaulinischen Briefe im Werk des Irenäus von Lyon (WUNT II/66), Tübingen 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Norelli E., “La funzione di Paolo nel pensiero di Marcione”, RivBib 34 (1986) 543-597.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Norelli E.La tradizione ecclesiastica negli antichi prologhi latini alle epistole paoline”, in La tradizione: forme e modi. XVIII Incontro di studiosi dell’antichità cristiana. Roma 7-9 maggio 1989 (Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum 31), Roma 1990, 301-324.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Norelli E.Que pouvons-nous reconstituer du Syntagma contre les hérésies de Justin?”, RThPh 139 (2007) 167-181.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Norelli E.La mémoire des origines chrétiennes: Papias et Hégésippe chez Eusèbe”, in B. Pouderon - Y.-M. Duval (ed.), L’historiographie de l’église des premiers siècles (Théologie Historique 114), Paris 2001, 1-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Norelli E. - Bovon F., “Dal Kerygma al canone. Lo statuto degli scritti neotestamentari nel secondo secolo”, CrSt 15 (1994) 525-540.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Norris R., “Irenaeus’ Use of Paul in His Polemic against the Gnostics”, in W. S. Babcock (ed.), Paul and the Legacies of Paul, Dallas TX 1990, 79-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  107. North J.L., “Paul’s protest that he does not lie in the light of his Cilician origin + An exploration of scriptural text transmission in the Pauline Epistles”, JThS 47 (1996) 439-446.
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Orbe A., Estudios sobre la teología cristiana primitiva (Fuentes Patrísticas Estudios 1), Madrid 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Orbe A.En torno al modalismo de Marción”, Greg 71 (1990) 43-65.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Pagels E.H., The Gnostic Paul. Gnostic Exegesis of the Pauline Letters, Philadelphia PA 1975.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Papia di Hierapolis, Esposizione degli Oracoli del Signore. I frammenti. Introduzione, testo, traduzione e note di E. Norelli (Letture cristiane del primo millennio 36), Milano 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Penna R., “L’origine del Corpus Paulinum: alcuni aspetti della questione”, CrSt 15 (1994) 577-607.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Perrin N., “Paul and Valentinian Interpretation”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 126-139.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Pervo R.I., ‘The Paul of Acts and the Paul of the Letters. Aspects of Luke as an Interpreter of the Corpus Paulinum”, in Marguerat (ed.), Reception, 141-155.
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Pervo R.I. The Making of Paul. Constructions of the Apostles in Early Christianity, Minneapolis MN 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Popkes W., “James and Scripture: An Exercise in Intertextuality”, NTS 45 (1999) 213-229.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Porter S.E., ‘When and How Was the Pauline Canon Compiled? An Assessment of Theories”, in Id. (ed.), The Pauline Canon, Leiden - Boston 2004, 95-127.
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Porter S.E.Was Paulinism a Thing When Luke-Acts Was Written?”, in Marguerat (ed.), Reception, 1-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Porter S.E.Paul and the Pauline Letter Collection”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 19-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Raspanti G., Mario Vittorino esegeta di S. Paolo, Palermo 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Ritter A.M. (ed.), Kerygma und Logos. Beiträge zu den geistesgeschichtlichen Beziehungen zwischen Antike und Christentum. Festschrift für Carl Andresen zum 80. Geburtstag, Göttingen 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Rizzi G., “Paolo contestato da rabbini e giudeo-cristiani, strumentalizzato dagli gnostici e riletto nelle tradizioni apocrife”, in Gieniusz (ed.), Paolo di Tarso, 105-186.
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Sáez Gutiérrez A., Canon y autoridad en los dos primeros siglos. Estudio histórico-teo-logicó acerca de la relación entre la Tradición y los escritos apostólicos (Studia Ephemeridis Augustinianum 142*.**), I-II, Roma 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Salles A., “La diatribe anti-paulinienne dans ‘Le roman pseudo-clémentin’ et l’origine des ‘Kérygmes de Pierre’ ”, RB 64 (1957) 516-551.
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Saxer V., Bible et Hagiographie. Textes et thèmes bibliques dans les Actes des martyrs authentiques des premiers siècles, Bern etc. 1986.
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Schäfer K.T., “Marcion und die ältesten Prologe zu den Paulusbriefen”, in P. Granfield - J.A. Jungmann (ed.), Kyriakon. Festschrift Johannes Quasten, I, Münster 1970, 135-150.
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Schäfer K.T.Marius Victorinus und die marcionitischen Prologe zu den Paulusbriefen”, Revue Béné1dictine 80 (1970) 7-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Scherbenske E.W., Canonizing Paul. Ancient Editorial Practice and the Corpus Paulinum, London 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Schmid U., Marcion und seine Apostolos. Rekonstruktion und historische Einordnung der marcionitischen Paulusbriefausgabe, Berlin 1995.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Schmid U.B., “Marcion and the Textual History of Romans: Editorial Activity and Early Editions of the New Testament”, in Studia Patristica LIV, 99-113.
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Schneemelcher W., “Paulus in der griechischen Kirche des zweiten Jahrhunderts”, ZKG 75 (1964) 1-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Schröter J., “Paul the Founder of the Church: Reflections on the Reception of Paul in the Acts of the Apostles and the Pastoral Epistles”, in Moessner et al. (ed.), Paul, 195-219.
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Simonetti M., “Per typica ad vera. Note sull’esegesi di Ireneo”, VetChr 18 (1981) 357-382.
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Simonetti M.Lo scriba di Matteo 13,52”, VetChr 22 (1985) 181-196.
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Simonetti M.Agl’inizi della filosofia cristiana: il de principiis di Origene”, VigChr 61 (2007) 157-173.
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Simonetti M.Presenza di Paolo nella cristologia patristica”, in A. Lenzuni (ed.), La lettera agli Efesini nel cristianesimo antico (Letture patristiche 12), Bologna 2008, 219-237.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Simonetti M. - Prinzivalli E., Storia della letteratura cristiana antica, Bologna 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Snyder G.E., Acts of Paul. The Formation of a Pauline Corpus (WUNT II/352), Tübingen 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Stanton G.N., “Gesù e il «vangelo»”, in Id., Gesù e il «vangelo», Brescia 2015, 27-100.
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Sterling G.E., “From Apostle to the Gentiles to Apostle of the Church: Images of Paul at the End of the First Century”, ZNW 99 (2008) 74-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Still T.D., “Shadow and Light: Marcion’s (Mis)Construal of the Apostle Paul”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 91-107.
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Still T.D.Martyrdom as Sacrament: Tertullian’s (Mis)Use of ‘the Apostle’ (Paul)”, in Still - Wilhite (ed.), Tertullian, 119-126.
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Still T.D. - Wilhite D.E. (ed.,), Tertullian and Paul, New York etc. 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Strathmann H., “μαρτύς”, in G. Kittel - G. Friedrich (ed.), Grande Lessico del Nuovo Testamento, VI, Brescia 1970, 1269-1372.
    [Google Scholar]
  145. Strecker G., “Paulus in nachpaulinischer Zeit”, Kairos 12 (1970) 208-216.
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Strecker G. Das Judenchristentum in den Pseudoklementinen (TU 70), Berlin 19812.
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Stuhlmacher P., “Das Christusbild der Paulus-Schule - eine Skizze”, in J.D.G. Dunn (ed.), Jews and Christians. The Parting of the Ways A.D. 70 to 135. The Second Durham-Tübingen Reserach Symposium on Earliest Christianity and Judaism (Durham, September, 1989) (WUNT 66), Tübingen 1992, 159-175.
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Taveirne M., “Das Martyrium als imitatio Christi. Die literarische Gestaltung der spatantiken Märtyrerakten und -passionen nach der Passion Christi”, ZAC 18 (2014) 167-203.
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Thompson T.W., “Claiming Ephesus: Pauline Legacy in the Acts of John”, in C.K. Rothschild - J. Schröter (ed.), The Rise and Expansion of Christianity in the First Three Centuries of the Common Era (WUNT 301), Tübingen 2013, 379-400.
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Tosolini F., “Paolo in Atti e nelle Pseudoclementine (Recognitiones I, 33-71)”, Augustinianum 26 (1986) 369-400.
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Towner P.H., “The Portrait of Paul and the Theology of 2 Timothy: The Closing Chapter of the Pauline Story”, HorBT 21 (1999) 151-170.
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Ulrich J., “Der ״Apostel der Häretiker“. Beabachtungen zur Paulusrezeption Tertullians”, in Klumbies - du Toit (ed.), Paulus, 565-581.
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Vegge T., Paulus und das antike Schulwesen. Schule und Bildung des Paulus (BZNW 134), Berlin - New York 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  154. Verheyden J., “ ‘Damn Paul … and Leave It There”. A Note on a Puzzling Formula”, in Klumbies - du Toit (ed.), Paulus, 435-461.
    [Google Scholar]
  155. Vielhauer P., “On the ‘Paulinism’ of Acts”, in Moessner et al. (ed.), Paul, 3-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Vinzent M., “Christ’s Resurrection: the Pauline Basis of Marcion’s Teaching”, in Studia Patristica XXXI, 225-233.
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Waldner K., “Les martyrs comme prophètes. Divination et martyre dans le discours chretien des Ier et IIe siecles”, RHR 224 (2007) 193-209.
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Weiss H.F., “Paulus und die Häretiker”, in W. Eltester (ed.), Christentum und Gnosis (BZNW 37), Berlin 1969, 116-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  159. Westerholm S. (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Paul, Malden MA - Oxford U.K.2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  160. White B.L., Remembering Paul. Ancient and Modern Contests over the Image of the Apostle, Oxford - New York 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  161. Widdicombe P., “Origen”, in Westerholm (ed.), The Blackwell Companion, 316-329.
    [Google Scholar]
  162. Wiles M.F., The Divine Apostle. The Interpretation of St Paul’s Epistles in the Early Church, Cambridge U.K. 1967.
    [Google Scholar]
  163. Willitts J., “Paul and Jewish Christians in the Second Century”, in Bird - Dodson (ed.), Paul, 140-168.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. Winter M., “Die Pastoralbriefe und Paulus vor dem Hintergrund der popularphilosophi- schen Seelenleitung”, in Klumbies - du Toit (ed.), Paulus, 479-510.
    [Google Scholar]
  165. Wolter M., “Die Entwicklung des paulinischen Christentums von einer Bekeherungsre- ligion zu einer Traditionsreligion”, Early Christianity 1 (2010) 15-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  166. Zahn T., Geschichte des neutestamentlichen Kanons. Erster Band, Erlangen 1888.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. Zocca E., “Modelli - Martirio - Santità: un rapporto multi direzionale”, Adamantius 14 (2008) 378-394.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.LA.4.2018011
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv