Skip to content
1882
Volume 12, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2032-5371
  • E-ISSN: 2507-0320

Abstract

Abstract

Most polyphonic compositions of the fifteenth century have at least one voice which begins without rests. The exceptions usually use the rests to create a musical upbeat, potentially motivated by the text. In less straightforward examples, the rests have the potential to cause confusion on the part of performers or scribes. Theorists only rarely addressed this phenomenon directly, but they did discuss rests as indicators of mensuration. As examples from the Leuven Chansonnier (Leuven, Alamire Foundation, Ms. 1) demonstrate, opening semibreve rests can be interpreted as indicating perfect or imperfect tempus, and opening breve rests as indicating imperfect minor modus. In two unusual cases, confusion over opening rests may have been directly responsible for scribal errors. Two further songs show how opening rests may have been a notational fix to issues arising during composition, thus shedding light on the compositional process. By examining the unique challenges that the original notation poses to all of its users, we can reach new insights into composition, transmission, and performance.

Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.JAF.5.121942
2020-09-01
2025-12-08

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.JAF.5.121942
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv