Skip to content
1882
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2736-2426
  • E-ISSN: 2736-2434

Abstract

Abstract

Most studies that aim to give integrated accounts of urban development in Hellenistic North Syria rely very much on information gathered from literary sources and draw heavily on analogies and circumstantial evidence. The master narrative developed along these lines is that the Seleucid kings profoundly transformed North Syria. Seleucus I allegedly triggered a largescale urbanization project that revitalized a largely depopulated region. However, the results of recent archaeological research suggest that the urban landscape of pre-Hellenistic North Syria was more diverse than previously acknowledged. While some of the cities can indeed be regarded as new and disembedded foundations, it now seems that most of them developed along individual trajectories rather than reflecting a royal strategy.

Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.JUA.5.121533
2020-01-01
2025-12-04

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abadie-Reynal, C. 2015. ‘Les Fouilles de sauvetage de Zeugma: un bilan des résultats’, Journal of Roman Archaeology, 28: 82145.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Abadie-Reynal, C. and J. Gaborit. 2003. ‘Le Développement urbain en Syrie du nord. Étude des cas de Séleucie et Apamée de l’Euphrate’, in M. Sartre and et al. (eds), La Syrie Hellénistique, Topoi, Suppl. 4 (Lyon: Maison de l’Orient Méditerranéen – Jean Pouilloux), pp. 14969.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdul Massih, J. (ed.). 2012. Le Théâtre de Cyrrhus, d’après les archives d’Edmond Frézouls, Cyrrhus, 1 (Beirut: Institut français du Proche-Orient).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrade, N. 2013. Syrian Identity in the Greco-Roman World: Greek Culture in the Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Archi, A., P. E. Pecorella, and M. Salvini. 1971. Gaziantep e la sua regione: uno studio storico e topografico degli insediamenti preclassici (Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aylward, W. (ed.). 2013. Excavations at Zeugma Conducted by Oxford Archaeology (Los Altos: Packard Humanities Institute).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Balty, J.-C. 1991a. ‘Apamée et la Syrie du Nord aux époques hellénistique et romaine’, Revue des mondes musulmans et de la Méditerranée, 62: 1526.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Balty, J.-C.. 1991b. ‘L’Urbanisme de la Tétrapolis syrienne’, in Ho Hellēnismos stēn Anatolē: Praktika 1. Diethnous Archaiologikou Synedriou Delphoi 6–9 Noemvriou 1986 (Athens: European Cultural Centre of Delphi), pp. 20329.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Berg, P.-L. van. 1972. Corpus cultus deae Syriae, Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’Empire romain, 28 (Leiden: Brill).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bilde, P. 1990. ‘Atargatis/Dea Syria: Hellenization of Her Cult in the Hellenistic-Roman Period?’, in P. Bilde and et al. (eds), Religion and Religious Practice in the Seleucid Kingdom (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press), pp. 15187.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blanton, R. E. 1976. ‘Anthropological Studies of Cities’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 5: 24964.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blaylock, S. 2009. Tille Höyük, iii.1: The Iron Age: Introduction, Stratification and Architecture (London: British Institute at Ankara).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Blaylock, S.. 2016. Tille Höyük, iii.2: The Iron Age: Pottery, Objects and Conclusions (London: British Institute at Ankara).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Blaylock, S., H. D. French, and G. D. Summers. 1990. ‘The Adiyaman Survey: An Interim Report’, Anatolian Studies: Journal of the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, 40: 81135.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Blömer, M. 2015. ‘Religious Continuity? The Evidence from Doliche’, in M. Blömer, A. Lichtenberger, and R. Raja (eds), Religious Identities in the Levant from Alexander to Muhammed: Continuity and Change, Contextualizing the Sacred, 4 (Turnhout: Brepols), pp. 12941.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Blömer, M. and H.-H. Nieswandt. 2016. ‘Atargatis und Alexander der Große: Ikonographische Überlegungen zu einer Münze aus Manbij/Hierapolis’, in H.-H. Nieswandt and H. Schwarzer (eds), ‘Man kann es sich nicht prächtig genug vorstellen!’: Festschrift für Dieter Salzmann zum 65. Geburtstag (Marsberg: Scriptorium), pp. 1330.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Blömer, M. and R. Raja. Forthcoming. The History of Urban Archaeology in Greater Syria: Cities of the Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine Periods.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bordreuil, P. 1996. ‘Une nouvelle monnaie babylonienne de Mazday’, in H. Gasche and B. Hrouda (eds), Collectanea orientalia: histoire, arts de l’espace et industrie de la terre, études offertes à Agnès Spycket (Neuchâtel: Recherches et publications), pp. 2730.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Capdetrey, L. 2007. Le pouvoir séleucide: territoire, administration, finances d’un royaume hellénistique (312–129 av. J.-C.) (Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes).
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Capdetrey, L.. 2012. ‘Fondations, diasporas et territoires dans l’Asie hellénistique au iiie siècle’, Pallas, 89: 31944.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Casana, J. 2007. ‘Structural Transformations in Settlement Systems of the Northern Levant’, American Journal of Archaeology, 111: 195221.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Casana, J.. 2014. ‘The Late Roman Landscape of the Northern Levant: A View from Tell Qarqur and the Lower Orontes Valley’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 33: 193219.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chuvin, P. 1988. ‘Les Fondations syriennes de Séleucos Nicator dans la Chronique de Jean Malalas’, in P.-L. Gatier, B. Helly, and J.-P. Rey-Coquais (eds), Géographie historique au Proche-Orient (Syrie, Phénicie, Arabie, grecques, romaines, byzantines): actes de la table ronde de Valbonne, 16–18 septembre 1985 (Paris: Éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique), pp. 99110.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Clarke, G. W. and et al.. 2002. Jebel Khalid on the Euphrates, i: Report on Excavations 1986–1996, Mediterranean Archaeology, Suppl. 5 (Sydney: Meditarch).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Clarke, G. W. and et al.. 2016. Jebel Khalid on the Euphrates, v: Report on Excavations 2000–2010, Mediterranean Archaeology, Suppl. 10 (Sydney: Meditarch).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cohen, G. M. 2006. The Hellenistic Settlements in Syria, the Red Sea Basin and North Africa (Berkeley: University of California Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Collar, A. 2017. ‘Sinews of Belief, Anchors of Devotion: The Cult of Zeus Kasios in the Mediterranean’, in E. H. Seland and H. Teigon (eds), Sinews of Empire: Networks and Regional Interaction in the Roman Near East and Beyond (Oxford: Oxbow), pp. 2336.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Coloru, O. 2013. ‘Seleukid Settlements: Between Ethnic Identity and Mobility’, Electrum, 20: 3756.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cumont, F. 1917. Études Syriennes (Paris: Picard).
    [Google Scholar]
  30. De Giorgi, A. U. 2016. Ancient Antiocheia: From the Seleucid Era to the Islamic Conquest (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Desreumaux, A., J. Gaborit, and J.-S. Caillou. 1999. ‘Nouvelles découvertes à Apamée d’Osrhoène’, Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 143: 75105.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Dusinberre, E. R. M. 2013. Empire, Authority, and Autonomy in Achaemenid Anatolia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Egea Vivancos, A. 2005. Eufratense et Osrhoene: poblamiento romano en el alto Éufrates sirio, Antigüedad y Cristianismo: Monografías Históricas sobre la Antigüedad Tardía (Murcia: Universidad de Murcia).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Egea Vivancos, A.. 2015. ‘Perduration, Continuity and Discontinuity in the Sanctuary of Atargatis in Hierapolis (Syria)’, in M. Blömer, A. Lichtenberger, and R. Raja (eds), Religious Identities in the Levant from Alexander to Muhammed: Continuity and Change, Contextualizing the Sacred, 4 (Turnhout: Brepols), pp. 199211.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Fauth, W. 1990. ‘Das Kasion-Gebirge und Zeus Kasios: Die antike Tradition und ihre vorderorientalischen Grundlagen’, Ugarit-Forschungen, 22: 10518.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ferrari, K. 2015. ‘Karkemish in età classica’, in N. Marchetti (ed.), An Ancient Capital on the Euphrates (Bologna: Ante Quem), pp. 11118.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Frézouls, E. 1978. ‘La Toponomie de l’Orient syrien et l’apport des éléments macédoniens’, in T. Fahd (ed.), La Toponymie antique: actes du colloque de Strasbourg, 12–14 juin 1975 (Leiden: Brill), pp. 21948.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Frézouls, E.. 1987. ‘Du village à la ville: problèmes de l’urbanisation dans la Syrie hellénistique et romaine’, in E. Frézouls (ed.), Sociétés urbaines, sociétés rurales dans l’Asie Mineure et la Syrie hellénistiques et romaines (Strasbourg: AECR), pp. 8183.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Frézouls, E.. 1988. ‘Fondations et refondations dans l’Orient syrien – Problèmes d’identification et d’interprétation’, in P.-L. Gatier, B. Helly, and J.-P. Rey-Coquais (eds), Géographie historique au Proche-Orient (Syrie, Phénicie, Arabie, grecques, romaines, byzantines): actes de la table ronde de Valbonne, 16–18 septembre 1985 (Paris: Éditions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique), pp. 11131.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Fuensanta, J. G. and P. Charvat. 2005. ‘Birecik achéménide et l’âge du Fer IIIB dans le Sud-Est anatolien’, in P. Briant and R. Boucharlat (eds), L’Archéologie de l’empire achéménide: nouvelles recherches, Persika, 6 (Paris: De Boccard), pp. 15173.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fuensanta, J. G. and E. Crivelli. 2009. ‘Late Iron Age. “Post-Assyrians” and Persians in Turkish Euphrates: An Archaeological or “Historical” Approach?’, in P. Matthiae and et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of the Archaeology of the Near East, i (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), pp. 6576.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gatier, P.-L. 2003. ‘Évolutions culturelles dans les sociétés du Proche-Orient syrien à l’époque hellénistique’, in F. Prost (ed.), L’Orient méditerranéen de la mort d’Alexandre aux campagnes de Pompée: cités et royaumes à l’époque hellénistique; actes du colloque international de la SOPHAU, Rennes, 4–6 avril 2003 (Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes), pp. 97115.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gawlikowski, M. 1996. ‘Thapsacus and Zeugma: The Crossing of the Euphrates in Antiquity’, Iraq, 58: 12333.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Gehrke, H.-J. 2009. ‘Zur Rolle von religiösen Vorstellungen und Ritualen in kulturellen Austauschprozessen’, in H.-J. Gehrke and A. Mastrocinque (eds), Rom und der Osten im 1. Jahrhundert v. Chr. (Akkulturation oder Kampf der Kulturen?) (Cosenza: Giordano), pp. 65122.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Gonella, J., K. Wahid, and K. Kohlmeyer. 2005. Die Zitadelle von Aleppo und der Tempel des Wettergottes (Münster: Rhema).
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Görkay, K. 2012. ‘Zeugma in the Light of New Research’, in K. Konuk (ed.), Stephanèphoros: de l’économie antique à l’Asie mineure; hommages à Raymond Descat (Bordeaux: Ausonius), pp. 275300.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Görkay, K.. 2016. Geçmişten Günümüze Bir Geçit – Zeugma (Ankara: Türkiye Iş Bankası Kültür Yayınları).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Grainger, J. D. 1990. The Cities of Seleukid Syria (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Green, A. R. W. 2003. The Storm-God in the Ancient Near East, Biblical and Judaic Studies, 8 (Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns).
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hannestad, L. 2013. ‘A Royal Signature Landscape: New Light on the Transformation of Northern Syria after the Conquest of Alexander’, in Monumentum Gregorianum: Sbornik naučnych statej pamjati akademika Grigorija Maksimoviča Bongard-Levina (Moscow: Granica), pp. 25075.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hogarth, D. G. 1907–1908. ‘Hierapolis Syriae’, Annual of the British School at Athens, 14: 18396.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Jackson, H. 2006. Jebel Khalid on the Euphrates, ii: The Terracotta Figurines (Sydney: Meditarch).
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Jackson, H.. 2014. Jebel Khalid on the Euphrates, iv: The Housing Insula (Sydney: Meditarch).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Jackson, H. and J. Tidmarsh. 2011. Jebel Khalid on the Euphrates, iii: The Pottery (Sydney: Meditarch).
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Joffe, A. H. 1998. ‘Disembedded Capitals in Western Asian Perspective’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40: 54980.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kahrstedt, U. 1926. Syrische Territorien in hellenistischer Zeit (Berlin: Weidmann).
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kennedy, D. 1998. The Twin Towns of Zeugma on the Euphrates: Rescue Work and Historical Studies, Journal of Roman Archaeology, Suppl. 27 (Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology).
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Kennedy, D.. 2015. ‘Zeugma and Thapsacus’, in P. Wheatley and E. Baynham (eds), East and West in the World Empire of Alexander: Essays in Honour of Brian Bosworth (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 27798.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Koch, K. 1993. ‘Ḫazzi-Ṣafôn-Kasion. Die Geschichte eines Berges und seiner Gottheiten’, in B. Janowski, K. Koch, and G. Wilhelm (eds), Religionsgeschichtliche Beziehungen zwischen Kleinasien, Nordsyrien und dem Alten Testament: Internationales Symposion Hamburg, 17–21 März 1990, Orbis biblicus et orientalis, 129 (Freiburg: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht), pp. 171223.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kosmin, P. J. 2014. The Land of the Elephant Kings: Space, Territory, and Ideology in the Seleucid Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Kühne, H. 2005. Magdalu/Magdala: Tall Šēḫ Ḥamad von der postassyrischen Zeit bis zur römischen Kaiserzeit (Berlin: Reimer).
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Lemaire, A. 1999. ‘MBGY/Menbigî monétaire de Transeuphratène avant Alexandre?’, in M. Amandry, S. Hurter, and D. Bérend (eds), Travaux de numismatique grecque offerts à Georges Le Rider (London: Spink and Son), pp. 21519.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Leriche, P. 2000. ‘Le Phénomène urbain dans la Syrie hellénistique’, in J.-C. David and M. al-Dbiyat (eds), La Ville en Syrie et ses territoires: héritages et mutations, Bulletin d’études orientales, 52 (Beirut: Institut français du Proche-Orient), pp. 99125.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Leriche, P.. 2003. ‘Peut-on étudier la Syrie séleucide?’, in F. Prost (ed.), L’Orient méditerranéen de la mort d’Alexandre aux campagnes de Pompée: cités et royaumes à l’époque hellénistique; actes du colloque international de la SOPHAU, Rennes, 4–6 avril 2003 (Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes), pp. 11746.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Leriche, P.. 2015. ‘Europos-Doura séleucide’, Electrum, 18: 2340.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Lightfoot, J. L. (ed.). 2003. Lucian: On the Syrian Goddess (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Lyonnet, B. 1996. ‘Settlement Pattern in the Upper Khabur (N.E. Syria), from the Achaemenids to the Abbasid Period: Methods and Preliminary Results from a Survey’, in K. Bartl and S. Hauser (eds), Continuity and Change in Northern Mesopotamia from the Hellenistic to the Early Islamic Period (Berlin: Reimer), pp. 34961.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Messerschmidt, W. 2017. ‘Das Heiligtum auf dem Dülük Baba Tepesi in der vorhellenistischen Eisenzeit – Versuch einer kulturgeschichtlichen Einordnung’, in E. Winter (ed.), Vom eisenzeitlichen Heiligtum zum christlichen Kloster: Berichte zu den Arbeiten auf dem Dülük Baba Tepesi, Dolichener und Kommagenische Forschungen, 9, Asien Minor Studien, 84 (Bonn: Habelt), pp. 3355.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Mildenberg, L. 1999. ‘A Note on the Coinage of Hierapolis-Bambyce’, in M. Amandry and S. Hurter (eds), Travaux de numismatique grecque offerts à Georges Le Rider (London: Spink and Son), pp. 27384.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Millar, F. 1987. ‘The Problem of Hellenistic Syria’, in A. Kuhrt and S. M. Sherwin-White (eds), Hellenism in the East: The Interaction of Greek and Non-Greek Civilizations from Syria to Central Asia after Alexander (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 11033.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Moorey, P. R. S. 1975. ‘Iranian Troops at Deve Höyük in Syria in the 5th Century bc’, Levant, 7: 10817.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Moorey, P. R. S.. 1980. Cemeteries of the First Millennium b.c. at Deve Höyük, near Carcemish, Salvaged by T. E. Lawrence and C. L. Wooley in 1913 (Oxford: British Archaeological Reports).
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Oenbrink, W. 2014. ‘Die Keramik aus Athen für Teššup/Iuppiter Dolichenus? Zu Neufunden attischer Keramik aus der Südosttürkei’, in E. Winter (ed.), Kult und Herrschaft am Euphrat, Asien Minor Studien, 73 (Bonn: Habelt), pp. 6596.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Oenbrink, W.. 2017. ‘Neufunde attischer Keramik vom Dülük Baba Tepesi’, in E. Winter (ed.), Vom eisenzeitlichen Heiligtum zum christlichen Kloster: Neue Forschungen auf dem Dülük Baba Tepesi, Dolichener und Kommagenische Forschungen, 9, Asia Minor Studien, 84 (Bonn: Habelt), pp. 5771.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Özgüç, N. 2009. Samsat: Sümeysat, Samosata Kumaha, Hahha, Hahhum; Bir Başkent ve Kalenin Uzun Yaşamının 6000 Yıllık Döneminden Kesitler (Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi).
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Peltenburg, E. and et al.. 2012. ‘The Land of Carchemish (Syria) Project: The Sajur Triangle’, in R. Matthews and J. Curtis (eds), Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East: 12 April–16 April 2010, the British Museum and UCL, London, iii: Fieldwork and Recent Research (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), pp. 191204.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Pöllath, N. and J. Peters. 2011. ‘“Smoke on the Mountain”: Animal Sacrifices for the Lord of Doliche’, in E. Winter (ed.), Von Kummuḫ nach Telouch: Historische und archäologische Untersuchungen in Kommagene, Dolichener und Kommagenische Forschungen, 4, Asia Minor Studien, 64 (Bonn: Habelt), pp. 4768.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Raja, R. 2012. Urban Development and Regional Identity in the Eastern Roman Provinces, 50 bcad 250: Aphrodisias, Ephesos, Athens, Gerasa (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Rostovtzeff, M. I. 1926. The Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Santley, R. S. 1980. ‘Disembedded Capitals Reconsidered’, American Antiquity, 45: 13245.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Sauvaget. J. 1934. ‘Le Plan de Laodicée-sur-Mer’, Bulletin d’études orientales, 4: 81114.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Schachner, A. 2008. ‘Babylonier und Achaemeniden auf dem Dülük Baba Tepesi. Kulturelle Vielfalt in der späten Eisenzeit im Spiegel der vor-hellenistischen Funde vom Dülük Baba Tepesi’, in E. Winter (ed.), Patris Pantrophos Kommagene: Neue Funde und Forschungen zwischen Taurus und Euphrat, Dolichener und Kommagenische Forschungen, 3, Asia Minor Studien, 60 (Bonn: Habelt), pp. 6996.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Schachner, A.. 2011. ‘Die Welt des östlichen Mittelmeers in kleinen Bildern Weitere Beobachtungen zu den Siegeln und Kleinfunden der späten Eisenzeit vom Dülük Baba Tepesi’, in E. Winter (ed.), Von Kummuḫ nach Telouch: Historische und archäologische Untersuchungen in Kommagene, Dolichener und Kommagenische Forschungen, 4, Asia Minor Studien, 64 (Bonn: Habelt), pp. 1946.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Schachner, A.. 2014. ‘Beobachtungen zu den Siegeln und Kleinfunden der Eisenzeit vom Dülük Baba Tepesi’, in E. Winter (ed.), Kult und Herrschaft am Euphrat, Asia Minor Studien, 73 (Bonn: Habelt), pp. 3347.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Schaeffer, C. 1938. ‘Les Fouilles de Ras Shamra-Ougarit’, Syria, 19: 31334.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Schwartz, G. M. and et al.. 2000. ‘Excavation and Survey in the Jabbul Plain, Western Syria: The Umm el-Marra Project 1996–1997’, American Journal of Archaeology, 104: 41962.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Schwemer, D. 2001. Wettergottgestalten Mesopotamiens und Nordsyriens im Zeitalter der Keilschriftkulturen: Materialien und Studien nach den schriftlichen Quellen (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Seyrig, H. 1970. ‘Séleucus I et la fondation de la monarchie Syrienne’, Syria, 49: 290311.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Stein, G. 2014. ‘Persians on the Euphrates? Two Achaemenid Burials from Hacınebi, Southeast Turkey’, in M. Kozuh and et al. (eds), Extraction and Control: Studies in Honor of Matthew W. Stolper, Oriental Institut, Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization, 68 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 26568.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Wagner, J. 1976. Seleukeia am Euphrat/Zeugma, Tubinger Atlas des Vorderen Orients, 10 (Wiesbaden: Reichert).
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Wilkinson, T. J. 2004. ‘The Disjunction between the Mediterranean and the Near Eastern Survey: Is It Real?’, in E. F. Athanassopoulos and L. Wandsnider (eds), Mediterranean Archaeological Landscapes: Current Issues (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), pp. 5557.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Wilkinson, T. J. and et al.. 2007. ‘Archaeology in the Land of Carchemish: Landscape Surveys in the Area of Jerablus Tahtani’, Levant, 39: 21347.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Winter, E. 2003. ‘Doliche in hellenistisch-römischer Zeit. Eine kommagenische Stadt zwischen Tradition und Innovation’, in E. Schwertheim and E. Winter (eds), Stadt und Stadtentwicklung in Kleinasien, Asia Minor Studien, 50 (Bonn: Habelt), pp. 5167.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Winter, E.(ed.). 2017. Vom eisenzeitlichen Heiligtum zum christlichen Kloster: Neue Forschungen auf dem Dülük Baba Tepesi, Dolichener und Kommagenische Forschungen, 9, Asia Minor Studien, 84 (Bonn: Habelt).
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Woolley, L. 1920. Dead Towns and Living Men: Being Pages from an Antiquary’s Notebook (London: Humphrey Milford).
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Wright, N. L. 2011. ‘The Last Days of a Seleucid City: Jebel Khalid on the Euphrates and its Temple’, in K. Erickson and G. Ramsey (eds), Seleucid Dissolution: The Sinking of the Anchor (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), pp. 11732.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.JUA.5.121533
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test