Skip to content
1882
Volume 55, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0078-2122
  • E-ISSN: 2507-0444

Abstract

Abstract

This article analyses the evidence behind the Norse derivation of OE (PDE ) and related terms (cp. ON ‘adulteress, harlot’). After establishing that the terms probably referred to promiscuity and moral depravity rather than prostitution , the article explores the eleventh-century contexts where the terms are recorded: the Old English glosses to Aldhelm’s in Brussels, Bibliothèque royale, MS 1650, and Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Digby 146, and the works of Archbishop Wulfstan II of York. The Norse-derived terms recorded in these texts belong to specific technolects (e.g. legal, monetary, and social terms), and, therefore, it is argued, their presence cannot be taken as strong evidence in favour of the Norse origin of the non-technical terms under consideration. The article concludes that, when this is considered together with the fact that there exist cognates for the terms in other Germanic languages and that the late attestation of the terms might be due to their informal, ‘demotic’, character rather than to their foreign etymology, there is not much evidence in favour of interpreting the terms as Norse derived. It is hoped that this approach will urge scholars to adopt similar caution when dealing with English terms whose late attestation is the main source of evidence for their suggested Norse origin.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.NMS.1.102418
2011-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.NMS.1.102418
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv