Skip to content
1882
Volume 55, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0078-2122
  • E-ISSN: 2507-0444

Abstract

Abstract

Disputes over episcopal appointments were one of the defining features of church-state relations in thirteenth-century England. This paper considers the episcopal elections which took place during the reign of Henry III (1216–72), focusing on contested elections which resulted in appeals to the papal curia. By examining the claims made about bishops-elect in this context, it is possible to identify the grounds on which kings (and other appellants) might object to the choices made by cathedral chapters. Objections focused on the ways in which the bishop-elect failed to measure up to an extremely specific model of episcopacy; if significant faults could be found, then the election was likely to be quashed. Consequently, theoretical knowledge was an extremely powerful weapon for all those involved in electoral disputes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.NMS.1.102422
2011-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.NMS.1.102422
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv