Romance Philology - With No Regrets † Rebecca Posner (17 August 1929-19 July 2018)

References

1. Works Cited
   Chaudenson, Robert. 1974. Lexique du parler créole de la Réunion. 2 vols. Paris: Champion.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cremona, Joseph A. 2002. “Joseph Cremona.” In Linguistics in Britain. Personal Histories, edd. Keith Brown and Vivien Law, 78–90. Oxford: Blackwell. [Autobiography]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ewert, Alfred. 1933. The French Language. London: Faber and Faber.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Goodman, Morris F. 1964. A Comparative Study of Creole French Dialects. The Hague: Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Grammont, Maurice. 1946. Traité de phonétique. Paris: Delagrave. Third revised edition.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Hall, Robert A. Jr., 1963. Idealism in Romance Linguistics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hall, Robert A. Jr.. 1966. Pidgin and Creole Languages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hall, Robert A. Jr.. 1980. Stormy Petrel Flies Again. Watkins Glen, N.Y.: American Life Foundation.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lausberg, Heinrich. 1956–1968. Romanische Sprachwissenschaft. 4 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Malkiel, Yakov. 1978. “The Classification of Romance Languages.” RPh 31: 467–500.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Malkiel, Yakov. 1990. “French Suffixal Derivation. Its Aloofness from Vocalic Gamuts.” In Variation and Change in French. Essays Presented to Rebecca Posner on the Occasion of her Sixtieth Birthday, edd. John N. Green and Wendy Ayres-Bennett, 180–200. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Muljacˇic´, Žarko. 1983 [1985]. Review of Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, 1–4. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 68:152–159.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Picard, Marc. 1997. Review of Rebecca Posner, Linguistic Change in French (1997). Canadian Journal of Linguistics 42:487–489.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Plank, Frans. 1984. “Romance Disagreements. Phonology Interfering with Syntax.” Journal of Linguistics 20:329–349.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Pope, M[ildred] K. 1934. From Latin to Modern French with Especial Consideration of Anglo-Norman. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Rivero, María-Luisa. 1984. “Diachronic Syntax and Learnability. Free Relatives in Thirteenth-Century Spanish.” Journal of Linguistics 20:81–129.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Togeby, Knud. 1964. “Qu’est-ce que la dissimilation?” RPh 17:642–667.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Varvaro, Alberto. 1999. Review of The Romance Languages (Posner 1996). Romanische Forschungen 111:444–448.
    [Google Scholar]
20. 1957
    “A Note on the Concept of Neutralisation in Morphology.” Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique 2:98–101.
    [Google Scholar]
21. 1961
    Consonantal Dissimilation in the Romance Languages. Publications of the Philological Society, 19. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. xxii + 230 pp. [Revised DPhil dissertation of the same title, University of Oxford, 1958]
    [Google Scholar]
22. “The Imperfect Endings in Romance.” Transactions of the Philological Society 17–55.
    [Google Scholar]
23. 1963
    “The Use and Abuse of Stylistic Statistics.” Archivum Linguisticum 15:111–139.
    [Google Scholar]
24. “Linguistique et littérature.” Marche Romane 13:38–56.
    [Google Scholar]
25. “Problems in Spanish Diachronic Phonology.” RPh 16:428–437.[Review article on Eugenio de Bustos Tovar, Estudios sobre asimilación y disimilación en el iberorománico (Madrid: CSIC, 1960)]
    [Google Scholar]
26. “Phonology and Analogy in the Formation of the Romance Perfect.” RPh 17:419–431. [Review article on Robert de Dardel, Le parfait fort en roman commun (Geneva and Paris: Droz, 1958)]
    [Google Scholar]
27. (with Joseph A. Cremona) “Romance Linguistics [1959–1962].” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 24: 9–38.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Review of Helmut Hatzfeld and Yves Le Hir, Essai de bibliographie critique de stylistique française et romane (1955–1960) (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1961). The Modern Language Review 58:428–429.
    [Google Scholar]
29. 1964
    (with Joseph A. Cremona) “Romance Linguistics [1963].” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 25:8–27.
    [Google Scholar]
30. 1965
    “Romance Imperfect and Conditional Endings — A Further Contribution.” Studia Neophilologica 37:3–10.
    [Google Scholar]
31. “Romance Linguistics [1964].” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 26:8–20.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Review of Bernard Pottier, Systématique des éléments de relation (Paris: Klincksieck, 1962). Journal of Linguistics 1:76–82.
    [Google Scholar]
33. 1966
    The Romance Languages. A Linguistic Introduction. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday. xxii + 336 pp. [Second rev. ed., Gloucester, Mass.: Smith, 1970]
    [Google Scholar]
34. “Rumanian and Romance Phonology.” RPh 19:450–459.[Review article on Octave Nandris¸, Phonétique historique du roumain (Paris: Klincksieck, 1963)]
    [Google Scholar]
35. “Romance Linguistics [1965].” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 27:8–22.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Review of H[aralambie] Miha˘escu, Limba latina˘ în provinciile Duna˘rene ale Imperiului Roman (Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 1960), and of Sorin Stati, Limba latina˘ în inscript¸iile din Dacia s¸i Scythia Minor (Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 1961). RPh 19: 644.
    [Google Scholar]
37. 1967
    “Positivism in Historical Linguistics.” RPh 20:321–331.[Rev. article on Robert A. Hall Jr., Idealism in Romance Linguistics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1963)]
    [Google Scholar]
38. “Romance Linguistics [1966].” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 28:9–19.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Review of A[lfred] L. Kroeber, An Anthropologist Looks at History, ed. Theodora Kroeber (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1963). RPh 21:75–78.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Review of Linguistica 4 (1961) and 5 (1963), edd. Milan Grošelj and Stanko Škerlj. RPh 21: 137.
    [Google Scholar]
41. 1968
    “Modernists versus Traditionalists. A Confrontation in Continental Europe.” RPh 21:544–558.[Review article on Méthodes de la grammaire: tradition et nouveauté, edd. Paul Delbouille, Philippe Munot, and Nicolas Ruwet (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1966)]
    [Google Scholar]
42. “Current Trends in Linguistics.” Current Anthropology 9:125–179.[Collaborative review article on Current Trends in Linguistics, III: Theoretical Foundations, ed. Thomas A. Sebeok. The Hague: Mouton, 1966]
    [Google Scholar]
43. “Romance Linguistics [1967].” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 29:8–17.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Review of J. Mattoso Câmara, Jr., Princípios de linguística geral (Rio de Janeiro: Livraria Acadêmica, 1964). Journal of Linguistics 4:141.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Review of Robert P. Stockwell and J. Donald Bowen, The Sounds of English and Spanish, and of Robert P. Stockwell, J. Donald Bowen, and John W. Martin, The Grammatical Structures of English and Spanish (both Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965). Journal of Linguistics 4:141–142.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Review of Bertil Malmberg, Les nouvelles tendances de la linguistique (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1966). French Studies 22:268–269.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Review of Maurice Leroy, The Main Trends in Modern Linguistics, translated by Glanville Price (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1967). French Studies 22:269–270.
    [Google Scholar]
48. 1969
    “Directions for Historical Linguistics.” RPh 23:143–153.[Review article on Directions for Historical Linguistics, edd. Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1968)].
    [Google Scholar]
49. (with John N. Green) “Romance Linguistics [1968].” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 30:9–22.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Review of Yakov Malkiel, Essays on Linguistic Themes (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1968). Language 45:364–369.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Review of Willy Bal, Introduction aux études de linguistique romane (Paris: Didier, 1966). RPh 22:321–324.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Review of Huntington Brown, Prose Styles. Five Primary Types (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1966). RPh 23:118–120.
    [Google Scholar]
53. 1970
    Iordan-Orr, An Introduction to Romance Linguistics, its Schools and Scholars. Revised, with a supplement, “Thirty Years On,” by R. Posner. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. xii + 593 pp.
    [Google Scholar]
54. (with John N. Green) “Romance Linguistics [1969].” The Year’s Work in Modern Language Studies 31:10–26.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Review of Universals in Language, ed. Joseph H. Greenberg, second edition (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1966). RPh 23:336–342.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Review of Yuen Ren Chao, Language and Symbolic Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968), and of Dwight L. Bolinger, Aspects of Language (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc., 1968). RPh 24:329–332.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Review of Witold Man´czak, Le développement phonétique des langues romanes et la fréquence (Krakow: Nakładem Uniwersytetu Jagiellon´skiego, 1969). Lingua 25:440–445.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Review of B. E. Vidos, Handbuch der romanischen Sprachwissenschaft (Munich: Max Hueber, 1968). French Studies 24:216–217.
    [Google Scholar]
59. 1971
    “On Synchronic and Diachronic Rules: French Nasalisation.” Lingua 27:184–197.
    [Google Scholar]
60. “The Generative Generation and French Phonology.” RPh 24: 625–633.[Review article onSanford A. Schane, French Phonology and Morphology (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1968)]
    [Google Scholar]
61. Review of Bernard Dupriez, L’étude des styles ou la commutation en littérature (Paris: Didier, 1969). Lingua 26:325–328.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Review of Harald Weinrich, Phonologische Studien zur romanischen Sprachgeschichte (Münster: Aschendorff, 1969). Journal of Linguistics 7:306–307.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Review of Yakov Malkiel, Linguistica generale, filologia romanza, etimologia (Florence: Sansoni, 1970). Lingua 27: 293–296.[Collection of nine essays by Malkiel translated into Italian by Olga Devoto.]
    [Google Scholar]
64. Review of Q[uirinus] I. M. Mok, Contribution à l’étude des catégories morphologiques du genre et du nombre dans le français parlé actuel (The Hague: Mouton, 1968). RPh 25:108–112.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Review of T. E[dward] Hope, Lexical Borrowing in the Romance Languages (Oxford: Blackwell, 1971, 2 vols.). The Times Literary Supplement 3627 (3 September): 1058.
    [Google Scholar]
66. 1972
    “Aspects of Aspect and Tense in French.” RPh 26:94–111.[Review article on Henry G. Schogt, Le système verbal du français contemporain (The Hague: Mouton, 1968)].
    [Google Scholar]
67. Review of Bobby R. Glover, A History of Six Spanish Verbs Meaning ‘To Take, Seize, Grasp’ (The Hague: Mouton, 1971). Lingua 30:277–280.
    [Google Scholar]
68. 1973
    “Homonymy, Polysemy, and Semantic Change.” Language Sciences 27:1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
69. “Antiphony on Nasalization.” York Papers in Linguistics 3:105–109.
    [Google Scholar]
70. “Postal’s Pronouncement on Phonological Phenomena.” RPh 26:664–673.[Review article on Paul M. Postal, Aspects of Phonological Theory (New York: Harper and Row, 1968)].
    [Google Scholar]
71. Review of A[nthonij] Dees, Étude sur l’évolution des démonstratifs en ancien et en moyen français (Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1971). Lingua 31:82–85.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Review of François Thurot, Tableau des progrès de la science grammaticale (Discours préliminaire à ‘Hermes’) [Introduction and notes by André Joly] (Bordeaux: Ducros, 1970). French Studies 27:215–216.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Review of Varia Linguistica: Maupertuis — Turgot — Condillac — Du Marsais— Adam Smith, ed. Charles Porset (Bordeaux: Ducros, 1970). French Studies 27: 216–218.
    [Google Scholar]
74. 1974
    “Ordering of Historical Phonological Rules in Romance.” Transactions of the Philological Society 98–127.
    [Google Scholar]
75. “Romance Languages.” In Encyclopaedia Britannica: Macropaedia R:1025–1045. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc. 15th edition. [Entry in unnumbered Macropaedia vol. R. Reprinted, revised by Marius Sala, 2002]
    [Google Scholar]
76. “Can Guillaume Teach us a Lesson?” Archivum Linguisticum 5:83–98.[Review article on Leçons de linguistique de Gustave Guillaume 1948–1949, ed. Roch Valin (Paris: Klincksieck, 1971, 2 vols.)]
    [Google Scholar]
77. Review of Readings in Romance Linguistics, edd. James M. Anderson and Jo Ann Creore (The Hague: Mouton, 1972). Lingua 34:93–96.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Review of Solomon Marcus, Poetica matematica˘ (Bucharest: Editura Academiei, 1970). Journal of Linguistics 10:216–217.
    [Google Scholar]
79. 1975
    “Semantic Change or Lexical Change?” In Diachronic Studies in Romance Linguistics, edd. Mario Saltarelli and Dieter Wanner, 177–182. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Review of James M. Anderson, Structural Aspects of Language Change (London: Longman, 1973). Journal of Linguistics 11:101–104.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Review of P[eter] H. Matthews, Morphology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974). Journal of Linguistics 11:270–277.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Review of Linguistic Studies Presented to André Martinet on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. I: General Linguistics, ed. Alphonse Juilland (= Word 23, 1967 [1970]). RPh 28:619–626.
    [Google Scholar]
83. 1976
    “The Relevance of Comparative and Historical Data for the Description and Definition of a Language.” York Papers in Linguistics 6:75–87.
    [Google Scholar]
84. “‘Phonemic Overlapping and Repulsion’ Revisited.” In Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, edd. Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé, and Werner Winter, 1: 235–243.Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press. [Reprinted Berlin: de Gruyter, 1978]
    [Google Scholar]
85. “First Steps in Structuralism.” Review of Jonathan Culler, Saussure (Hassocks: Harvester and London: Fontana, 1976). The Times Literary Supplement 3897 (19 November):1458.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Review of Jean-Pierre Seguin, La langue française au XVIII^e siècle (Paris: Bordas, 1972). French Studies 30:324–326.
    [Google Scholar]
87. 1977
    “Mentalist Historical Phonology — An Infantile Disorder?” In Studia Gratularia in Honor of Robert A. Hall, Jr., ed. David Feldman, 229–236. Madrid: Playor.
    [Google Scholar]
88. “What Does Romance Linguistics Need?” Linguistics 197:67–72.[Review article on W. D[ennis] Elcock, The Romance Languages, revised by John N. Green (London: Faber and Faber, 1975), and Robert A. Hall, Jr., External History of the Romance Languages (New York: Elsevier, 1974)].
    [Google Scholar]
89. Review of Henriette Walter, La dynamique des phonèmes dans le lexique français contemporain (Paris: France-Expansion, 1976). Lingua 41:95–97.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Review of Richard A. Hudson, Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976). Lingua 43:391–394.
    [Google Scholar]
91. 1978
    Review of Andrew Radford, Italian Syntax. Transformational and Relational Grammar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977). Journal of Linguistics 14:356–366.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Review of Robert A. Hall, Jr., Proto-Romance Phonology (New York: Elsevier, 1976). Linguistics 208:71–73.
    [Google Scholar]
93. 1979
    “Chronologie de la palatalisation romane. Résumé des règles.” In Atti del XIV congresso internazionale di linguistica e filologia romanza, ed. Alberto Varvaro, 3:35–52. Napoli: Macchiaroli.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Review of James Knowlson, Universal Language Schemes in England and France 1600– 1800 (Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1975). French Studies 33:1067–1069.
    [Google Scholar]
95. 1980
    On the Romance Languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 23 pp. [Inaugural lecture, University of Oxford]
    [Google Scholar]
96. Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, 1: Romance Comparative and Historical Linguistics, edd. Rebecca Posner and John N. Green. The Hague: Mouton Publishers. x – 386 pp. [= TRLP] “Introduction.” TRLP 1:3–21.
    [Google Scholar]
97. “Historical Romance Lexicology and Semantics.” TRLP 1:175–190.
    [Google Scholar]
98. “Romance History — Creolization and Decreolization? Or Diffusion and Focussing?” York Papers in Linguistics 9:173–192.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Composite review of Luis Fernando Lara, El concepto de forma en lingüística (Mexico City: Colegio de México, 1976); Bernard P. F. Al, La notion de grammaticalité en grammaire générative-transformationnelle (Leiden: Universitaire Pers, 1975); Heles Contreras, A Theory of Word Order, with Special Reference to Spanish (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1976); and Lingua e contesto 1 (Manfredonia: Atlantica Editrice, 1975). RPh 34:95–100.
    [Google Scholar]
100. 1981
     Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, 2: Synchronic Romance Linguistics, edd. Rebecca Posner and John N. Green. The Hague: Mouton. vii + 422 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
101. “Lexical Gaps and How to Plug Them.” In Language, Meaning and Style. Essays in Memory of Stephen Ullmann, edd. T. E[dward] Hope, T. B. W. Reid, Roy Harris, and Glanville Price, 117–135. Leeds: Leeds University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
102. 1982
     Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, 3: Language and Philology in Romance, edd. Rebecca Posner and John N. Green. The Hague: Mouton. viii + 478 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, 4: National and Regional Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, edd. Rebecca Posner and John N. Green. The Hague: Mouton. viii + 331 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
104. “Favoured Approaches among Romance-speaking Nations.” TRLP 4:3–8.
     [Google Scholar]
105. (with Michael Metzeltin and Maria Manoliu-Manea) “Teories lingüístiques i lingüística romànica.” In Actes du XVI^ème congrès de linguistique et philologie romanes, ed. Aina Moll, 1:233–276. Palma de Mallorca: Moll. [Round table discussion, including R. Posner, “Vers une méthode de linguistique romane,” 235–241].
     [Google Scholar]
106. “The Scientific and the Social.” The Times Literary Supplement 4,136 (9 July):734. [Review of Hans Aarsleff, From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History (London: Athlone Press, 1982)]
     [Google Scholar]
107. 1983
     “The Origins and Affinities of French Creoles: New Perspectives.” Language and Communication 3:191–201.[Review article on Philip Baker and Chris Corne, Isle de France Creole. Affinities and Origins (Ann Arbor: Karoma, 1982) and Claire Lefebvre, Hélène Magloire-Holly, and Nanie Piou, Syntaxe de l’haïtien (Ann Arbor: Karoma, 1982)].
     [Google Scholar]
108. Review of Étienne Brunet, Le vocabulaire français de 1789 à nos jours (Geneva: Slatkine and Paris: Champion, 1981, 3 vols.). French Studies 37:119–120.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Review of Robert L. Collison, A History of Foreign-Language Dictionaries (London: André Deutsch, 1982). French Studies 37: 505.
     [Google Scholar]
110. 1984
     “Double Negatives, Negative Polarity and Negative Incorporation in Romance. A Historical and Comparative View.” Transactions of the Philological Society 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
111. “Creolization or Linguistic Change.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:204–205. [Peer comment on a position paper by Derek Bickerton]
     [Google Scholar]
112. “Signs Without End.” The Times Literary Supplement 4,237 (June 15):660. [Review of Umberto Eco, Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language (London: Macmillan, 1984)]
     [Google Scholar]
113. Review of Papers from the XIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. Philip Baldi (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1984). Linguistics 22:913–918.
     [Google Scholar]
114. 1985
     “Diachronic Syntax — Free Relatives in Romance.” Journal of Linguistics 21:181–189.
     [Google Scholar]
115. “Non-agreement on Romance Disagreements.” Journal of Linguistics 21:437–451.
     [Google Scholar]
116. “Creolization as Typological Change. Some Examples from Romance Syntax.” Diachronica 2:167–188.
     [Google Scholar]
117. “Post-Verbal Negation in Non-Standard French. A Historical and Comparative View.” RPh 39:170–197.
     [Google Scholar]
118. “Histoire de la négation et la typologie romane.” In Actes du XVII^ème congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes, ed. Jean-Claude Bouvier, 2:263–271. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Review of Étienne Brunet, Le vocabulaire de Proust (Geneva: Slatkine and Paris: Champion, 1983). French Studies 39:103–105.
     [Google Scholar]
120. 1986
     “La créolisation — altération typologique?” Études créoles 9.1:127–134.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Review of Un abbozzo di grammatica francese del ‘500. Le note di Gian Vincenzo Pinelli, ed. Anna Maria Raugei (Fasano di Puglia: Schena and Paris: Nizet, 1984). French Studies 40:67–68.
     [Google Scholar]
122. 1987
     “Creolization and Syntactic Change in Romance.” In Papers from the 7^th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, edd. Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba, and Giuliano Bernini, 473–481. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Review of Studies in Romance Linguistics, edd. Osvaldo Jaeggli and Carmen Silva-Corvalán (Dordrecht: Foris, 1986). Linguistics 25: 797–804.[Papers from the Fourteenth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, University of Southern California, February 1984]
     [Google Scholar]
124. Review of En hommage à Charles Muller. Méthodes quantitatives et informatiques dans l’étude des textes. Computers in Literary and Linguistic Research [no named editor] (Geneva: Slatkine and Paris: Champion, 1986). French Studies 41:497–498.
     [Google Scholar]
125. 1988
     “Definiteness and the History of French Possessives.” French Studies 42: 385–397.
     [Google Scholar]
126. “Linguistic Variation, Change and Typology in Romance.” In Energeia und Ergon. Studia in honorem Eugenio Coseriu, edd. Jörn Albrecht, Jens Lüdtke, and Harald Thun, 3: 161–166.Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
127. Review of Studies in the History of Western Linguistics in Honour of R. H. Robins, edd. Theodora Bynon and F. R. Palmer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986). Linguistics 26:312–318.
     [Google Scholar]
128. Review of Studies in Romance Languages, edd. Carol Neidle and Rafael A. Núñez Cedeño(Dordrecht: Foris, 1987). Linguistics 26: 501–510.[Papers from the Fifteenth Annual Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Boston, March 7–9, 1985]
     [Google Scholar]
129. 1989
     “Histoire de la linguistique romane: questions de méthodologie.” In Actes du XVIII^ème congrès de linguistique et philologie romanes, ed. Dieter Kremer, 7:35–36.Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
130. “Entre Raynouard et Diez. Sir George Cornwallis Lewis.” In Actes du XVIII^ème congrès de linguistique et philologie romanes, ed. Dieter Kremer, 7:134–140.Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
131. Review of François Rastier, Sémantique interprétative (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1987). The Modern Language Review 84:460–462.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Review of The Romance Languages, edd. Martin Harris and Nigel Vincent (London and Sydney: Croom Helm, 1988). Linguistics 27:557–562.
     [Google Scholar]
133. Review of Eduardo Blasco Ferrer, Grammatica storica catalana e dei suoi dialetti con speciale riguardo all’Algherese (Tübingen: Narr, 1984). Mediterranean Language Review 4/5: 150–154.
     [Google Scholar]
134. 1990
     “Sir George Cornewall Lewis: Statesman and ‘New Philologist’.” Historiographia Linguistica 17:339–356.
     [Google Scholar]
135. “Romance Comparative Grammar and Linguistic Change.” In Papers from the 8^th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, edd. Henning Andersen and Konrad Koerner, 399–409. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
136. “Linguistics and Philology. Parametric Change and Romance Possessives.” In Historical Linguistics and Philology, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 337–351. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
137. Review of Étienne Brunet, Le Vocabulaire de Victor Hugo (Paris: Champion and Geneva: Slatkine, 1988, 3 vols.). French Studies 44:71–72.
     [Google Scholar]
138. Review of Wilhelm Hellmann, Charles Bally: Frühwerk, Rezeption, Bibliographie (Bonn: Romanistischer Verlag, 1988), and of Charles Bally, Unveröffentliche Schriften. Comptes rendus e essais inédits, ed. Wilhelm Hellmann (Bonn: Romanistischer Verlag, 1988). The Modern Language Review 85:739–740.
     [Google Scholar]
139. 1991
     “Je ne regrette rien.” In Wege in der Sprachwissenschaft: vierundvierzig autobiographische Berichte. Festschrift für Mario Wandruszka, edd. Hans-Martin Gauger and Wolfgang Pöckl, 187–192. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
140. Review of Pour une théorie de la langue écrite, ed. Nina Catach (Paris: CNRS, 1988). French Studies 45:116–117.
     [Google Scholar]
141. Review of Jean-Pierre Mailhac, Le temps opératif en psychomécanique du langage (Paris: Champion, 1989). French Studies 45: 247.
     [Google Scholar]
142. Review of Henriette Walter, Le français dans tous les sens (Paris: Laffont, 1988). Journal of French Language Studies 1:113–114.
     [Google Scholar]
143. Review of La lingua francese nel seicento, edd. P[asquale] A[niel] Jannini, Giovanni Dotoli, and Paolo Carile (Bari: Adriatica and Paris: Nizet, 1989). The Modern Language Review 86: 452.
     [Google Scholar]
144. Review of Wilhelm Kesselring, Dictionnaire chronologique de la langue française: le XVII siècle, 1: 1601–1606 (Heidelberg: Winter, 1989). The Modern Language Review 86:1009–1010.
     [Google Scholar]
145. 1992
     “Linguistic Conflict between Romance Languages — and How to Resolve it.” Journal of the Institute of Romance Studies 1:17–26.
     [Google Scholar]
146. “Language.” In The Legacy of Rome: A New Appraisal, ed. Richard Jenkyns, 367–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
147. Review of Armin Schwegler, Analyticity and Syntheticity (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1990). Journal of Linguistics 28:559–560.
     [Google Scholar]
148. Review of Willy Bal, Jean Germain, Jean Klein, and Pierre Swiggers, Bibliographie sélective de linguistique romane et française (Paris and Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, 1991). Journal of French Language Studies 2:265–266.
     [Google Scholar]
149. 1993
     Trends in Romance Linguistics and Philology, 5: Bilingualism and Linguistic Conflict in Romance, edd. Rebecca Posner and John N. Green. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. x + 630 pp. [Includes a translation by R. Posner of Ghjacumu Thiers, “Language contact and Corsican polynomia,” 253–270]
     [Google Scholar]
150. “Language Conflict in Romance. Decline, Death and Survival.” TRLP 5:41–75.
     [Google Scholar]
151. (with Kenneth H. Rogers) “Bilingualism and Language Conflict in Rhaeto-Romance.” TRLP 5:231–252.
     [Google Scholar]
152. “Language Conflict or Language Symbiosis? Contact of other Romance Varieties with Castilian.” In Hispanic Linguistic Studies in Honour of F. W. Hodcroft, edd. David Mackenzie and Ian Michael, 89–106. Oxford: Dolphin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
153. “Latin to Romance (Again!). Change or Genesis?” In Historical Linguistics 1991. Papers from the 10^th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. Jaap van Marle, 265–279. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
154. “La romanité des créoles à base lexicale romane.” In Actes du XX^e congrès international de linguistique et philologie romanes, ed. Gerold Hilty, 3:251–263.Tübingen: Francke.
     [Google Scholar]
155. Review of Marleen Van Peteghem, Les phrases copulatives dans les langues romanes (Wilhelmsfeld: Egert, 1991). Journal of French Language Studies 3:251–252.
     [Google Scholar]
156. 1994
     “Historical Linguistics, Language Change, and the History of French.” Journal of French Language Studies 4:75–97.
     [Google Scholar]
157. “Third-person Subjects in French. A Historical View.” In Subjecthood and Subjectivity, ed. Marina Yaguello, 109–123. Paris: Ophrys.
     [Google Scholar]
158. “Romance Linguistics in Oxford 1840–1940.” In Lingua et traditio. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft und der neueren Philologien. Festschrift für Hans Helmut Christmann zum 65. Geburtstag, edd. Richard Baum, Klaus Böckle, Franz Josef Hausmann, and Franz Lebsanft, 375–383. Tübingen: Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
159. “Non-Topical Human Agents in Romance. A Historical and Pragmatic Approach.” In Hommages offerts à Maria Manoliu-Manea, edd. Coman Lupu and Glanville Price, 100–121. Bucharest: Pluralia.
     [Google Scholar]
160. “Romania Within a Wider Europe. Conflict or Cohesion?” In The Changing Voices of Europe. Papers in Honour of Professor Glanville Price, edd. M. Mair Parry, Winifred V. Davies, and Rosalind A. M. Temple, 23–33. Cardiff: University of Wales Press and Modern Humanities Research Association.
     [Google Scholar]
161. Review of Elmar Schafroth, Zur Entstehung und vergleichenden Typologie der Relativpronomina in den romanischen Sprachen (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1993). Journal of French Language Studies 4:264–265.
     [Google Scholar]
162. Review of Olivier Soutet, La concession dans la phrase complexe en français (Geneva: Droz, 1992). French Studies 48:117–118. [Author name misprinted ‘Oliver’ at source, corrected here]
     [Google Scholar]
163. Review of Écriture, langues communes et normes. Formation spontanée de koinès et standardisation dans la Galloromania et son voisinage, edd. Pierre Knecht and Zygmunt Marzys with Dominique Destraz (Geneva: Droz, 1993). French Studies 48:501–502.
     [Google Scholar]
164. 1995
     “Article and Pronoun in Romance. An Historical View.” In Estudis de lingüistica i filologia oferts a Antoni M. Badia i Margarit [edd. M^a Teresa Cabré, Lídia Pons, Joaquim Rafel, Joan Veny, and Joaquim Viaplana], 2:153–168. Barcelona: Abadia de Montserrat.
     [Google Scholar]
165. “Contact, Social Variants, Parameter Setting, and Pragmatic Function. An Example from the History of French Syntax.” In Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions, ed. Jacek Fisiak, 217–236. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
166. Contributions to Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. R[onald] E. Asher. Oxford: Pergamon. Articles on “French” (3:1299–1301) and “Occitan” (5:2865–2866); and biographies of “Emilio Alarcos Llorach” (1:65), “Amado Alonso” (1:73), “Gustav Gröber” (3:1506), “Yakov Malkiel” (5:2355), “Ramón Menéndez Pidal” (5:2448–2449), and “Tomás Navarro Tomás” (5: 2764–2765).
     [Google Scholar]
167. Review of Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIII. April 1–4, 1993, ed. Michael L. Mazzola (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1994). Journal of French Language Studies 5:135–138.
     [Google Scholar]
168. Review of R. Anthony Lodge, French. From Dialect to Standard (London: Routledge, 1993). The Modern Language Review 90: 742.
     [Google Scholar]
169. Review of Mario Mormile, Storia dei dizionari bilingui italo-francesi: la lessicografia italo-francese dalle origini al 1900 (Fasano di Puglia: Schena, 1993). French Studies 49: 115.
     [Google Scholar]
170. Review of Trevor Jones, Claude Duneton: ‘Parler croquant’ (Glasgow: Glasgow University Press, 1994). French Studies 49: 240.
     [Google Scholar]
171. Review of Romanistica Turkuensis. Mélanges d’études romanes offerts à Lauri Lindgren à l’occasion de son 60^e anniversaire [no named editor] (Turku: Université de Turku, 1993). French Studies 49: 241.
     [Google Scholar]
172. 1996
     The Romance Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. xvii + 376 pp., 5 maps.
     [Google Scholar]
173. “La linguistique romane au début du XIX^e siècle.” In Actas do XIX congreso internacional de lingüística e filoloxía románicas, ed. Ramón Lorenzo, 8:161–167.A Coruña: Fundación Barrié de la Maza.
     [Google Scholar]
174. “Les théories du langage et la linguistique romane.” In Actas do XIX congreso internacional de lingüística e filoloxía románicas, ed. Ramón Lorenzo, 8:335–421.A Coruña: Fundación Barrié de la Maza. [Introduction and contribution to Round Table]
     [Google Scholar]
175. Review of La Subordination dans les langues romanes. Actes du colloque international Copenhague 5.5—7.5 1994, edd. Hanne Leth Andersen and Gunver Skytte (Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1995). Journal of French Language Studies 6: 99–100.[Editor name misprinted ‘Gunnar’ at source, corrected here]
     [Google Scholar]
176. Review of Jean-Elie Boltanski, La linguistique diachronique (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1995). Journal of French Language Studies 6:103–105.
     [Google Scholar]
177. Review of Michèle Goyens, Émergence et évolution du syntagme nominal en français (Bern: Lang, 1994). Journal of French Language Studies 6:112–113.
178. Review of Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages. Selected Papers from the 21^st Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXI), Santa Barbara, California, 21–24 February 1991, edd. William J. Ashby, Marianne Mithun, Giorgio Perissinotto, and Eduardo Raposo (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1993). French Studies 50:108–109.
     [Google Scholar]
179. Review of Opérateurs et constructions syntaxiques. Évolution des marques et des distributions du XV^e au XX^e siècle [no named editor] (Paris: ENS, 1994). French Studies 50:245–246.
     [Google Scholar]
180. Review of Gunver Skytte, Kristian Sandfeld: vie et œuvre (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum, 1994). French Studies 50: 246.
     [Google Scholar]
181. Review of Gudrun Krassin, Neuere Entwicklungen in der französischen Grammatik und Grammatikforschung (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1994). French Studies 50: 497.
     [Google Scholar]
182. 1997
     Linguistic Change in French. Oxford: Clarendon Press. xxi + 509 pp.
     [Google Scholar]
183. “Romance Germanic Contact and the Peripheral Vowel Feature.” In Language History and Linguistic Modelling. A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60^th Birthday, edd. Raymond Hickey and Stanisław Puppel, 1:1039–1054. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
184. Review of Aspects of Romance Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV, March 10–13, 1994, edd. Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli, and María Luisa Zubizaretta (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1996). Journal of French Language Studies 7:115–116.
     [Google Scholar]
185. Review of Grammatical Theory and Romance Languages. Selected Papers from the 25^th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXV), Seattle, 2–4 March 1995, ed. Karen Zagona (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1996). The Modern Language Review 92:678–679.
     [Google Scholar]
186. Review of Heinrich Lausberg zum Gedenken. Akten eines wissenschaftlichen Kolloquiums, Münster, 24. und 25. Januar 1994, ed. Wolfgang Babilas (Münster: Nodus, 1995). French Studies 51:116–117.
     [Google Scholar]
187. Review of Wolf Hollerbach, The Syntax of Contemporary French (Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1994). French Studies 51:544–545.
     [Google Scholar]
188. 1998
     “La morphologie ‘progressive’ en français: aperçu historique.” La Linguistique 34(2):103–110.
     [Google Scholar]
189. “Romance Linguistics in the Nineties.” RPh 51:326–355.[Composite review article on: Contemporary Research in Romance Linguistics, edd. Jon Amastae, Grant Goodall, Mario Montalbetti, and Marianne Phinney (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995); Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics, ed. Michael L. Mazzola (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1994); Aspects of Romance Linguistics, edd. Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli, and María Luisa Zubizaretta (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1996); Grammatical Theory and Romance Languages, ed. Karen Zagona (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1996); and Linguistic Theory and the Romance Languages, edd. John Charles Smith and Martin Maiden (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1995)].
     [Google Scholar]
190. Review of André Lanly, Deux problèmes de linguistique française et romane (Paris: Champion, 1996). French Studies 52:116–117.
     [Google Scholar]
191. Review of Reidar Veland, Les marqueurs référentiels celui-ci et celui-là. Structure interne et déploiement dans le discours direct littéraire (Geneva: Droz, 1996). French Studies 52: 117.[Author name misprinted ‘Reider’ at source, corrected here]
     [Google Scholar]
192. Review of Stefan Gutwin, Der ‘accord du participe passé’ als Testfall der französischen Grammatikschreibung (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1996). French Studies 52:244–245.
     [Google Scholar]
193. Review of Raffaella Zanuttini, Negation and Clausal Structure. A Comparative Study of the Romance Languages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997). Journal of French Language Studies 8:279–281.
     [Google Scholar]
194. 1999
     Review of Willy Bal, Jean Germain, Jean Klein, and Pierre Swiggers, Bibliographie sélective de linguistique française et romane, new edition (Louvain-la-Neuve: Duculot, 1997). Journal of French Language Studies 9:113–114.
     [Google Scholar]
195. Review of Psychomécanique du langage: problèmes et perspectives, edd. Paolo de Carvalho and Olivier Soutet (Paris: Champion, 1997). French Studies 53:372–373.
     [Google Scholar]
196. Review of Sophie Marnette, Narrateur et points de vue dans la littérature médiévale (Bern: Lang, 1998). French Studies 53:459.
     [Google Scholar]
197. Review of Marc-Ariel Friedemann, Sujets syntaxiques. Positions, inversions et pro (Bern: Lang, 1997). Journal of French Language Studies 9:288–289.
     [Google Scholar]
198. Review of Barbara S. Vance, Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Verb-Second and Null Subjects (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997). Journal of French Language Studies 9: 307–308.
     [Google Scholar]
199. 2000
     “Syntactic Change. Thoughts on the Romance Partitive.” Studii s¸i Cerceta˘ri Lingvistice 48 (1997) [2000]:357–362.
     [Google Scholar]
200. “Modern Languages and Linguistics.” In The History of the University of Oxford. Volume VII. Nineteenth-Century Oxford, Part 2, edd. M[ichael] G. Brock and M[ark] C. Curthoys, 413–427. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
201. “New Words on New World French.” RPh 54 (Fall 2000):103–112.[Review article on Daniel Schlupp, Modalités prédicatives, modalités aspectuelles et auxiliaires en créole à base lexicale française de la Guyane française (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1997); and French and Creole in Louisiana, ed. Albert Valdman (New York: Plenum, 1997)].
     [Google Scholar]
202. 2001
     “Geschichte der vergleichenden romanischen Grammatiken/Histoire des grammaires romanes comparées.” In Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, 1.1: Geschichte des Faches Romanistik, edd. Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin, and Christian Schmitt, 532–543. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
     [Google Scholar]
203. Review of Creoles and Cajuns, ed. Wolfgang Binder (Frankfurt: Lang, 1998). RPh 54 (Spring 2001):486–488.
     [Google Scholar]
204. Review of L’emprise du sens: structures linguistiques et interprétations. Mélanges de syntaxe et de sémantique offerts à Andrée Borillo, edd. Marc Plénat et alii (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999). French Studies 55: 288.
     [Google Scholar]
205. Review of Frede Jensen, A Comparative Study of Romance (Bern and New York: Lang, 1999). Journal of French Language Studies 11:281–282.
     [Google Scholar]
206. 2002
     Review of La psychomécanique aujourd’hui. Actes du 8^e colloque international de psychomécanique du langage, edd. Paolo de Carvalho, Nigel Quayle, Laurence Rosier, and Olivier Soutet (Paris: Champion, 2001). French Studies 56:560–561.
     [Google Scholar]
207. 2003
     “Recherches sur l’histoire des langues romanes: les sociétés savantes et congrès.” In Romanische Sprachgeschichte/Histoire linguistique de la Romania, edd. Gerhard Ernst, Martin-Dietrich Gleßgen, Christian Schmitt, and Wolfgang Schweickard, 1: 433–437. Berlin: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
208. 2004
     Review of Béatrice Coffen, Histoire culturelle des pronoms d’adresse: vers une typologie des systèmes allocutoires dans les langues romanes (Paris: Champion, 2002). The Modern Language Review 99: 1066.
     [Google Scholar]