Skip to content
1882
Volume 16, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1250-7334
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9718

Abstract

Abstract

We here reconsider the idea of a “Theodosian Renaissance”, characterised by Ernst Kitzinger chiefly as the return to a kind of new classicism — including some alterations, of course — after a true crisis of Graeco-Roman art whose paroxysm would have occured during the Tetrarchic and Constantinian periods. But the evidence of several realizations of these decades, and a more objective look on other ones frequently invoked, determine a different interpretation. The classical spirit was not at all out of fashion around 300; and, regarding the general trend at least, it is rather a slow and progressive evolution, begun a long time ago, which led without any actual break to what was going to prevail about one century later.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.AT.3.16
2008-01-01
2025-12-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.AT.3.16
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv