Skip to content
1882
Volume 63, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0078-2122
  • E-ISSN: 2507-0444

Abstract

Abstract

This chapter investigates the heresiological techniques employed by the Valentinians, one of the most popular forms of early Christian theology, later refuted by so called ‘Church Fathers’. The chapter begins with a critical review of the history of the concept of early Christian heresy as well as the category ‘Valentinianism’. It is here argued that Valentinian heresiological techniques did not differ in any significant way from those of their orthodox contemporaries. The heresy of the heretics should, just as for orthodox writers, chiefly be understood as a way to highlight differences and similarities alike, in order to create a sustainable group identity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.NMS.5.118192
2019-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Primary Sources
    The Bible: The New Revised Standard Version, ed. by Bruce M. Metzger and others (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clement of Alexandria, ‘Clement of Alexandria: The Stromata, or Miscellanies’, trans. by William Wilson, in The Ante-Nicene Fathers: Volume ii, ed. Alexander Roberts and Fames Donaldson (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979), pp. 484950
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Clement of Alexandria, Stromata, ed. by Otto Stählin and others as Clemens Alexandrinus, Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller, 52, 3rd edn (Berlin: Akademie, 1970)
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Epiphanius, Panarion, ed. and trans. by Frank Williams, 2 vols (Leiden: Brill, 2009–13)
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eusebius, Demonstratio Evangelica, ed. and trans. by John William Ferrar (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1920)
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Excerpta ex Theodoto, ed. and trans. by Robert Pierce Casey (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. The Gospel of Philip, in Images of Rebirth: Cognitive Poetics and Transformational Soteriology in the Gospel of Philip and the Exegesis on the Soul, ed. and trans. by Hugo Lundhaug (Leiden: Brill, 2010), pp. 468539
    [Google Scholar]
  8. The Gospel of Truth, ed. by Harold W Attridge, in Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex): Introduction, Text, Translation, Indices (Leiden: Brill, 1985), pp. 55117
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gregory of Nyssa, Life of Moses, ed. and trans. by Abraham J. Malherbe and Everett Ferguson (New York: Paulist Press, 1978)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies, ed. and trans. by David M. Litwa (Atlanta: SBL Press, 2016)
    [Google Scholar]
  11. The Interpretation of Knowledge, ed. by Wolf Peter Funk as L’interprétation de la gnose: NH XI, 1, ed. by Wolf Peter Funk, Louis Painchaud, and Einar Thomassen (Québec: Peeters, 2010)
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Irenaeus of Lyon, ‘Against Heresies’, trans. by Alexander Roberts and William Rambaut, in Ante-Nicene Fathers i, ed. by Alexander Roberts and others (Buffalo: Christian Literature Publishing, 1885), pp. 508954
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Irenaeus of Lyon, Against Heresies, ed. by W. Wigan Harvey (Rochester: St Irenaeus Press, 2013)
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Josephus, Against Apion, ed. and trans. by H. St J. Thackeray, Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Josephus, The Jewish Wars, ed. and trans. by H. St J. Thackeray. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho, ed. by Michael Slusser, trans. by Thomas B. Falls (Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 2003)
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Justin Martyr, First and Second Apology, trans. by Leslie William Barnard (New York: Paulist Press, 1997)
    [Google Scholar]
  18. On the Origin of the World, in The Coptic Gnostic Library: Nag Hammadi Codex II, 2–7, ed. by Bentley Layton, Nag Hammadi Studies, 21 (Leiden: Brill, 1989), pp. 1293
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Origen, On First Principles, trans. by G. W. Butterworth (Notre Dame, IN: Christian Classics, 2013)
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Origen, Peri Archon, ed. by Herwig Görgemanns and others as Origenes Vier Bücher von den Prinzipien (Dramstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1985)
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Tertullian, Against Marcion, trans. by Peter Holmes, as ‘The Five books Against Marcion’, in Ante-Nicene Fathers iii, ed. by Alexander Roberts and others (Buffalo: Christian Literature Publishing, 1885), pp. 432820
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tertullian, Against the Valentinians, ed. by Emil Kroymann as Adversus Valentinianos (Vienna: Verlag der Österreischichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1906)
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tertullian, ‘Against the Valentinians’, trans. by Alexander Roberts, in Ante-Nicene Fathers iii, ed. by Alexander Roberts and others (Buffalo: Christian Literature Publishing, 1885), pp. 875910
    [Google Scholar]
  24. The Tripartite Tractate, ed. by Harold W Attridge, in Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex): Introduction, Text, Translation, Indices (Leiden: Brill, 1985), pp. 159337
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Secondary Studies
    Brakke, David, The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011)
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Brewer, Marilynn B., ‘The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17 (1991), 475482
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Crouzel, Henri, ‘A Letter from Origen to Friends in Alexandria’, in The Heritage of the Early Church: Essays in Honor of George Vasilievich Florovsky, ed. by D. Neiman and M. Schatkin (Rome: Pontificale Instituo Orientale, 1973), pp. 135150
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Desjardins, Michel, ‘The Sources for Valentinian Gnosticism: A Question of MethodologyVigiliae Christianae, 49 (1986), 342347
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dunderberg, Ismo, Gnostic Morality Revisited (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015)
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dunderberg, Ismo, ‘Recognizing the Valentinians – Now and Then’, in The Other Side: Apocryphal Perspectives on Ancient Christian ‘Orthodoxies’, ed. by Tobias Nicklas and others (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 2017), pp. 3953
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Eshleman, Kendra, The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire: Sophists, Philosophers, and Christians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Frede, Michael, A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, ed. by A. A. Long (Berkley: University of California Press, 2011)
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Harnack, Adolf von, History of Dogma i (New York: Dover, 1961)
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hurtado, Larry W., The Earliest Christian Artifacts: Manuscripts and Christian Origins (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006)
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Karamanolis, George E., The Philosophy of Early Christianity (London: Routledge, 2013)
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kenney, John Peter, ‘The Platonism of the Tripartite Tractate (NH I, 5)’, in Neoplatonism and Gnosticism, ed. by Richard T. Wallis and Jay Bregman (New York: State University of New York Press, 1992), pp. 187206
    [Google Scholar]
  37. King, Karen L., What is Gnosticism? (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003)
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lampe, Peter, From Paul to Valentinus: Christians at Rome in the First Two Centuries (London: T&T Clark, 2003)
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Layton, Bentley, The Gnostic Scriptures (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007)
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Layton, Bentley, ‘Prolegomena to the Study of Ancient Gnosticism’, in The Social World of the First Christians: Essays in Honor of Wayne A. Meeks, ed. by L. Michael White and others (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995), pp. 334350
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Linjamaa, Paul, The Ethics of the ‘Tripartite Tractate’ (NHC I, 5): A Study of Determinism and Early Christian Philosophy of Ethics (Leiden: Brill, 2019)
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Linjamaa, Paul, ‘The Female Figures and Fate in The Interpretation of Knowledge, NHC XI,1ʹ, Journal of Early Christian Studies, 24.1 (2016), 2954
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Linjamaa, Paul, ‘The Pit and the Day from Above: Sabbath-Symbolism in the Gospel of Truth and the Interpretation of Knowledge’, Swedish Exegetical Yearbook, 80 (2015), 187206
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lundhaug, Hugo, ‘“Gnostisisme” og “valentinianisme”’, Chaos 36 (2001), 2743
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lundhaug, Hugo, Images of Rebirth: Cognitive Poetics and Transformational Soteriology in the Gospel of Philip and the Exegesis on the Soul (Leiden: Brill, 2010)
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lundhaug, Hugo, and Lance Jenott, The Monastic Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015)
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Markschies, Christoph, Valentinus Gnosticus? Untersuchungen zur valentinianischen Gnosis mit einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten Valentins (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992)
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Martin, Dale B., The Corinthian Body (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995)
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pagels, Elaine, The Gnostic Paul (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1975)
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Pearson, Birger, Ancient Gnosticism: Tradition and Literature (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2007)
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rasimus, Tuomas, Paradise Reconsidered in Gnostic Myth-Making: Rethinking Sethianism in Light of the Ophite Evidence (Leiden: Brill, 2009)
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Simon, Marcel, ‘From Greek Hairesis to Christian Heresy’, in Early Christian Literature and the Classical Intellectual Tradition, ed. by W. R. Schoedel and R. L. Wilken (Paris: Éditions Beauchesne, 1979), pp. 101116
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Smith, Geoffrey, Guilt by Association: Heresy Catalogues in Early Christianity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Staden, Heinrich von, ‘Hairesis and Heresy: The Case of the Haireseis Iatrikai’, in Jewish and Christian Self-Definition iii, ed. by B. F. Meyer and E. P. Sanders (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982), pp. 76100
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Thomassen, Einar, ‘Going to Church with the Valentinians’, in Practicing Gnosis: Ritual, Magic, Theurgy and Liturgy in Nag Hammadi, Manichaean and Other Ancient Literature. Essays in Honour of Birger A. Pearson, ed. by April DeConick and others (Leiden: Brill, 2013), pp. 183197
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Thomassen, Einar, ‘Orthodoxy and Heresy in Second-Century Rome’, Harvard Theological Review, 97.3 (2004), 241256
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Thomassen, Einar, The Spiritual Seed (Leiden: Brill, 2006)
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tite, Philip, Valentinian Ethics and Paraenetic Discourse (Leiden: Brill, 2009)
    [Google Scholar]
  59. White, Michael L., ‘Moral Pathology: Passions, Progress, and Protreptic in Clement of Alexandria’, in Passion and Progress in Greco-Roman Thought, ed. by John T. Fitzgerald (London: Routledge, 2008), pp. 284321
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Williams, Michael, A., Rethinking ‘Gnosticism’: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.NMS.5.118192
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv