Skip to content
1882
Volume 29, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0332-1592
  • E-ISSN: 2034-6506

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the connections between the penitential works attributed to Gildas and David and those of the anonymous author of the and Cummian. It argues that the penitential attributed to Gildas should be regarded as a genuine work by Gildas and that the be considered as ‘the book of David’, from which excerpts were made. Attempts by Cummian to combine these two authorial traditions in seventh-century Ireland point to the continuing strength of a British Church, against the image presented by Bede.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.PERIT.5.118486
2018-01-01
2025-12-08

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.PERIT.5.118486
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv