Skip to content
1882
Volume 134, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0035-0893
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9009

Abstract

Abstract

A case-study in Augustinian chronology, this article seeks to lay out, in full, the evidence for the dating of the last five books of . Modern chronologieshave proceeded backwards from the writing of by 427 and forwards from the manifestly erroneous chronological data given in 18.54, which places it ‘about thirty years’ after March 399. While the resulting dates are broadly correct, this reasoning overlooks an important set of homiletic data. Following a now-neglected argument, the Maurists and Tillemont derived a date from 22.8 and a series of sermons (320–323) connected to the cult of St. Stephen. Supplemented with information provided in 355–356 and 319 and buttressed by new manuscript readings, that argument remains valid. Except perhaps for a portion of book 22, will have finished either by summer of 423 or by summer of 426, before Augustine’s semi-retirement that September. Per the later (and usual) dating, book 18 will belong in 423 or 424, which makes its vague chronology and omission of the (otherwise apropos) destruction of the temple of Caelestis in 421 especially problematic. The article therefore suggests four ways of explaining the oddities surrounding book 18: Augustine’s authorial choice, a shorter chronology (split in two due to uncertainty over Paschal dates), and a hiatus in composition ca. 421.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RB.5.143658
2024-12-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RB.5.143658
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv