Skip to content
1882
Volume 58, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1768-9260
  • E-ISSN: 2428-3606

Abstract

Abstract

Les deux traités que Tertullien a consacrés à la doctrine pénitentielle, (entre 198 et 203) et (après 207), ont été abondamment étudiés pour leurs enjeux historiques. Cet article montre que, malgré l’opposition de leur ecclésiologie et de leurs conclusions pratiques, puisque les péchés graves relevant dans le premier de la pénitence post-baptismale sont qualifiés d’irrémissibles dans le second, ils s’inscrivent cependant dans une grande continuité doctrinale, toujours appuyée sur une exégèse rigoureuse. Le rigorisme croissant du théologien, confronté au laxisme pénitentiel, est avant tout légitimé par un souci de cohérence ecclésiologique. Tertullien pose les jalons d’une réflexion sur la nécessité de penser des limites au pardon et de distinguer des degrés entre les péchés, réflexion que les Pères des ive et ve siècles déploieront. Le premier, il regroupe les quatre textes qui constitueront le noyau du dossier scripturaire de l’irrémissible : Mt 12, 32-32 ; 1 Jn 5, 16 ; 1 Co 5, 5 ; He 6, 4-8.

Abstract

The two treaties devoted by Tertullian to his penitential doctrine, the (written between 198 and 203) and the (after 207), have been extensively studied for their historical issues. This article shows that despite their opposite ecclesiological and practical conclusions - grave sins coming under the post-baptismal penance in the first treaty are seen as unforgivable in the second one -, the is nevertheless a follow-up to the , in great doctrinal continuity with it, relied on the same rigorous exegesis. The increasing rigorism of the theologian, faced with penitential laxness, is foremost legitimized by his will of consistency in ecclesiological matters. Tertullian lays the groundwork for a reflection on the limits to forgiveness and the distinction between degrees of sin, reflection which the Fathers of the fourth and fifth centuries undertake. He is the first one to use together the four main biblical texts related to the unforgivable: Matthew 12:32-32; 1 John 5:16; 1 Corinthians 5:5; Hebrews 6:4-8.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.REA.5.101077
2012-07-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.REA.5.101077
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv