Skip to content
1882
Volume 141, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0035-6220
  • E-ISSN: 2785-0773

Abstract

Abstract

Taking the paper by Prandi and Landucci as a starting point, this contribution discusses some problems regarding LXXI 4808. 1) In col. I 14-15, the name of the biographer Hermippus (Ἔ[ρ|μιπ]πος) is supplied as that of the authority referred to for, among other things, the statement that Cleitarchus was the teacher of Ptolemy IV, which favors a late date for this historian of Alexander. 2) According to our reconstruction of the discussion of Hieronymus of Cardia, the historian was regarded by the author as unbiased, but too heavily reliant on speeches. 3) Cleitarchus is accused of exaggeration, which means that the author doubted the reliability of his account. 4) The text might have been part of a collection of material () for a historiographical work. 5) In terms of historiographical theory in antiquity, the text provides significant evidence for the importance of truth and the active participation of the historian in the events described.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RFIC.5.123195
2013-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RFIC.5.123195
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv