Skip to content
1882
Volume 141, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0035-6220
  • E-ISSN: 2785-0773

Abstract

Abstract

After his return from exile, Cicero refers on several occasions to ‘his monument’ (), ‘his’ in that he had previously carried out the locatio operis of the structure as decided by the senate; but he complains that Clodius had placed his name on this monument and that the senate had done nothing to prevent him. The identification of the building which Cicero considered his has always been problematic, but, some years ago, the reconstruction of an important epigraphic text from Ostia, in which the names both of Cicero and Clodius appear, has suggested that it may be identified with the late republican walls of Ostia. This hypothesis is now proposed again with new arguments, demonstrating at the same time that the different solution lately proposed by Ph. Moreau, based on an interpretation of a passage of . 1, 9, 15, is not acceptable either from an historical-archaeological or a philological- linguistic point of view.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RFIC.5.123197
2013-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RFIC.5.123197
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv