Skip to content
1882
Volume 54, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1768-9260
  • E-ISSN: 2428-3606
read_more Read

Abstract

Abstract

Certaines références des témoins manuscrits du dans la sont parfois imprécises, et la liste est apparue incomplète. La consultation des catalogues de manuscrits des bibliothèques a permis de faire apparaître dix nouveaux témoins de ce texte apocryphe connu par deux recensions, (66) et (65) ; une première collation montre, dans la recension , l’existence de deux familles de manuscrits qui proposent notamment un ordre narratif différent, et permet de proposer des hypothèses de liens entre les manuscrits ; enfin, un nouveau témoin d’une version brève du est apparu.

Abstract

Some of the references of the in the may lack of precision and the list appears to be uncomplete. Consulting the libraries catalogs lead to the discovery of ten new witnesses of this apocryphal text known by two recensions called (66) and (65); a first collation reveals the existence in the recension of two families of manuscripts that offer in particular a different narrative order, which allows to form hypotheses about the links existing between the manuscripts; and a new witness of a short version of the was brought to light.

Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RM.5.101021
2008-07-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.RM.5.101021
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv