Skip to content
1882
Volume 28, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0890-2917
  • E-ISSN: 2031-0242

Abstract

Abstract

This article argues that the arguments defending image-worship in are designed to rehabilitate, rather than to hereticate, the Lollard sympathizers who make up its implied audience. The author of does this by casting images as books which must be read and interpreted, rather than as pictures depicting their subjects. This strategy seeks to build consensus among image-venerators and their potential opponents by appealing to their interest in books and their suspicion of the affective devotional practices that frequently surrounded images. The article suggests that the difficulties that scholars have in categorizing (all call it ‘orthodox’ but feel the need to footnote or qualify that designation) indicates a wider and more interesting variety of ‘orthodox’ stances than has previously been acknowledged.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.YLS.5.103725
2014-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.YLS.5.103725
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv