BOB2022MOOT
Collection Contents
2 results
-
-
Bede and the Beginnings of English Racism
show More to view fulltext, buy and share links for:Bede and the Beginnings of English Racism show Less to hide fulltext, buy and share links for: Bede and the Beginnings of English RacismBy: W. Trent FoleyThis book examines how the Venerable Bede constructs a racial order in his most famous historical writing, Ecclesiastical History of the English People, a remarkable eighth-century work known for how it combines myth and history into a compelling, charming narrative of the English conversion to Christianity. Yet Bede’s History also disturbingly deploys Scripture’s tropes and types, many of them anti-Jewish, to render unflattering sketches of some of Britain’s “races” (gentes)-especially the Britons.
To uncover the History’s characterizations of what it identifies as the British, Irish, English, and Latin races, Foley examines three of its episodes that narrate attempted conversions of the first three races- respectively-either to Christianity or to a better, more orthodox, catholic, Latin version of it. This close analysis exposes the theological dimensions of each episode’s racial constructions. Foley argues that, unlike modern conceptions of race, which are grounded in imagined biological difference, Bede’s is rooted in his perception of a particular race’s affective disposition, its habits of the heart. More than that, Bede closely ties a race’s disposition to its relative proximity to theological orthodoxy and catholicity. This book’s close reading also highlights surprising similarities between Bede’s medieval Christian discourse and modern, secular and white discourses on race.
-
-
-
Boire sous l’œil de Gorgias
show More to view fulltext, buy and share links for:Boire sous l’œil de Gorgias show Less to hide fulltext, buy and share links for: Boire sous l’œil de GorgiasBy: Johann GoekenPlato’s Symposium and Xenophon’s Symposium are unexpected and untapped sources on rhetoric and its links to the socio-religious rite of banqueting. They offer two different and sometimes opposing points of view on rhetoric, and both, contrary to what has often been said, include a critical view of the rituals of sociability. Plato and Xenophon both react to the realities of their times and suggest, each in his own way, that rhetoric, under certain conditions, can be a mode of conviviality, i.e. an intellectual tool, an exercise in citizenship learning, a research instrument, or even a step towards truth. In both cases, the tutelary and fascinating figure of Gorgias is summoned, sometimes to criticize the deadly rhetoric of the sophists which constitutes an obstacle to convivial dialogue, sometimes to promote a constructive practice of speech in the communicational and visual space that symposium creates.
-

