Skip to content
1882
Volume 17, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1250-7334
  • E-ISSN: 2295-9718

Abstract

Abstract

40-41 (a letter supposedly written by the emperor Julian to Basil of Caesarea, and the response of the latter) are unanimously regarded as spurious, the work of a byzantine schoolboy. But this schoolboy is extremely well-informed about people, places, and situations. His main source is undoubtedly Gregory of Nazianzus, who is also the inspirer of the main idea the forger wants to credit: that Basil was an enemy of Julian. Such representation is groundless. On the contrary, some clues exist that seem to prove the opposite is true. The apocriphal letters are the product of a milieu determined to clear the famous bishop of Caesarea of blame of having been in good terms with the emperor soon labeled as Apostate.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.AT.3.43
2010-01-01
2025-12-08

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.AT.3.43
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv