Skip to content
1882
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1846-8551
  • E-ISSN: 2507-041X

Abstract

Abstract

This paper considers the reaction of audiences to images of the Virgin Mary in contemporary art that deviate from historically sanctioned ideals of beauty. Twelfth century monk, Bernard of Clairvaux, for example states that Mary was chosen as the mother of God which supposedly illustrates her moral and spiritual worthiness. It follows that the physical beauty found in images of Mary is inextricably tied up with notions of her “divinity” and her efficacy as an intercessor. The contemporary examples discussed in this paper are atypical, one might say transgressive examples of Marian iconography. They have both received very strong negative reactions from the public. The examples I discuss are (popularly known as the Dung Madonna) by British artist Chris Ofili and the by South African artist Diane Victor. I investigate public reaction to these images and try to ascertain how much of the response derives from historic expectations that imbue images of a perfectly beautiful (and therefore possibly divine) Mary. I argue that the conflation of Mary’s beauty and divinity has accumulated in religious iconography for centuries, to the degree that atypical contemporary images might be considered iconoclastic by those who believe that to undermine her beauty is to undermine her religious significance. Such beliefs could indicate a slippage between icon and prototype, or sign and signifier, that has become entrenched through historic repetition.

Abstract

Ovaj rad razmatra reakcije publike na prikaze Djevice Marije u suvremenoj umjetnosti koji proizlaze iz povijesno sankcioniranih ideala ljepote. Redovnik Bernard iz Clairvauxa (12. st.) kao primjer navodi da je Marija bila izabrana kao majka bož- ja zbog njezine fizičke ljepote, koja ilustrira njene moralne i duhovne vrijednosti. Proizlazi iz navedenog, da je fizička ljepota u prikazima Marije neraskidivo vezana s idejom njezina„božanstva“ i uspješnosti u ulozi posrednice. Suvremena umjetnička djela, prikazana u ovom radu, predstavljaju atipične, čak i transgresivne primjere marijanske ikonografije. Oba su rada pobu- dila iznimno negativne reakcije publike. Radi se o (poznata kao i ) britanskog umjetnika Chrisa Ofilija i južnoafričke umjetnice Diane Victor. Istražuje se odnos javnosti prema ovim prikazima i pokuša- va se utvrditi koliko su prepoznate reakcije rezultat povijesno formiranih kriterija, koji prožimaju prikaze savršeno lijepe (i božanstvene) Marije. U tekstu se raspravlja o stapanju i razvoju kroz povijest Marijine ljepote i božanstva u ikonografiji do stupnja u kojem se atipični suvremeni prikazi smatraju ikonoklastičnima, unutar krugova koji koji vjeruju da se umanjenjem njezine ljepote podcjenjuje njena religijska važnost. Ovakvi stavovi navode na raskol između ikone i prototipa, ili znaka i označitelja, što postaje činjenicom uslijed povijesnih ponavljanja.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.IKON.4.2017030
2017-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.IKON.4.2017030
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv