Skip to content
1882
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2506-6730
  • E-ISSN: 2506-6749
file format pdf download PDF
read_more Read side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Abstract

This article is focused on nuclear transboundary issues between Portugal and Spain, two countries that share a long history of nuclear collaboration and conflict of late, where national borders played a crucial role. The issues at stake cover the full spectrum of the nuclear cycle: uranium mining, power production and waste disposal. The first stage, under two fascist dictatorships, was characterised by collaboration within a common techno-political imaginary, where nuclear energy was understood as a driver of modernity, but with the absence of the public in decision-making processes. The second stage was marked by the advent of democracy in both countries and the reconfiguration of nuclear policies: while Portugal abandoned the nuclear endeavour, Spain implemented a nuclear moratorium but kept ten reactors operative. The third phase, which started in 1986 and goes until the present time, was marked by two crucial events: joining the European Communities (EC) and the Chernobyl accident. The first event allowed Brussels to become a referee on Spanish/Portuguese nuclear disputes. The second one implied that Portugal expanded its institutional vigilance on Spanish nuclear activities and led to the emergence of transboundary social movements against nuclear power.

© Brepols Publishers NV

[open-access]

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.116794
2018-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jhes/3/1/J.JHES.5.116794.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.116794&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Unpublished Sources
    Compañía Sevillana de Electricidad (1968), Actas del Consejo de Administración. Archivo INI.
  2. Compañía Sevillana de Electricidad and Empresa Termoeléctrica Portuguesa (1966), Informe sobre viabilidad de una central Hispano-Portuguesa en el sur de la península ibérica, Diciembre.
  3. Madeira, B. T. J. (2016) “Não foi para morrer que nós nascemos” – O movimento ecológico do Porto (1974-1982), Unpublished MA Dissertation, University of Porto.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. UKAEA (1958) Notes for Chairman of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) Visit Spain, September 1958, British National Archives at Kew. NA, Foreign Office, AB 6115.
  5. Printed and Electronic Sources
    ABC (1968a) ‘Llegó el presidente de la JEN portuguesa’, ABC, 28 June 1968, p. 71.
  6. ABC (1968b) ‘Proyecto de aprovechamiento común hidroeléctrico entre España y Portugal’, ABC, 17 July 1968, p. 7.
  7. ABC (1970) ‘Acuerdo hispano-portugués sobre energía nuclear’, ABC, 15 July 1970, p. 18.
  8. ABC (1971) ‘Portugal y España’, ABC, 13 July 1971, p. 18.
  9. Ambiente em Movimento (2017) ‘Movimento pela reparação dos danos causados pelas minas de urânio em Portugal: o caso das minas da Urgeiriça’, available at http://www.ambientemovimento.org/urgeirica-canas-de-senhorim.
  10. Ambiente em Movimento (2017b) ‘Stop urânio: ações transfron-teiriças contra a mineração de urânio’, available at http://www.ambientemovimento.org/retortillo.
  11. BOE (1972) Instrumento de Ratificación del Acuerdo entre el Gobierno el Estado Español y el Gobierno de la República de Portugal sobre cooperación en la utilización de la energía nuclear para fines pacíficos. Nº147, (20 junio 1972).
  12. Boletin Oficial del Estado (BOE, Spanish Government Official Law Publication).
  13. Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales (1987), ‘Resoluciones aprobadas por la Comisión de Industria, Obras Públicas y Servicios, relativos al Informe del segundo semestre de 1986 del Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear’, nº 50, pp. 1733–35.
  14. Butler, S. and Bud, R. (2018), ‘United Kingdom – Short Country Report’, in History of Nuclear Energy and Society (HoNESt) Consortium Deliverable 3.6., available at: http://www.honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/UK.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Carrión, I., (1971) ‘La Amenaza de la Energía Nuclear’ Blanco y Negro, 26th June 1971, p. 32.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN), Informe al Congreso de los Diputados y al Senado, CSN/IS/1/81, 31/12/1981.
  17. Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN), Informe al Congreso de los Diputados y al Senado, CSN/IS/2/82, 31/12/1982.
  18. Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN), Informe al Congreso de los Diputados y al Senado, CSN/IS/6/84, 30/6/1984.
  19. Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (CSN), Informe al Congreso de los Diputados y al Senado, CSN/IS/11/86, 31/11/1986.
  20. Diario da Assamblea da Republica, ‘Reunião Plenaria de 12 de Novembro de 1987’, p.473. Available at http://debates.parlamento.pt/catalogo/r3/dar/01/05/01/022/1987-11-12?sft=true&org=PLC&plcdf=true
  21. Diario de Sesiones del Congreso de los Diputados, Sesión de la Comisión de Industria, Obras Públicas y Servicios de 239 de junio de 1987, nº 145, pp. 5333–93.
  22. Diario de Sesiones del Congreso de los Diputados, Sesión de la Comisión de Industria, Obras Públicas y Servicios de 29 de junio de 1987, nº 149, pp. 5441–65.
  23. EFE (2018) ‘Más de 3.000 personas protestan en calles Salamanca contra la mina de uranio’, Agencia EFE, available at: https://www.efe.com/efe/castillayleon/sociedad/mas-de-3-000-personas-protestan-en-calles-salamanca-contra-la-mina-uranio/50000473-3534461.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. El País (1987) ‘Júbilo en Aldeadávila y Portugal tras la renuncia a la construcción del laboratorio de residuos nucleares’, El País, 18 October 1987.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. ENRESA (1988), Memoria 1987, Madrid.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Esquerda.Net (2017) ‘“Encerrar Almaraz”, gritou-se em Madrid’, Esquerda.Net, available at https://www.esquerda.net/artigo/encerrar-almaraz-gritou-se-em-madrid/49180.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Esquerda.Net (2018) ‘Salamanca: milhares de pessoas protestaram contra mina de urânio em Retortillo’ Esquerda.Net, available at https://www.esquerda.net/artigo/salamanca-milhares-de-pessoas-protestaram-contra-mina-de-uranio-em-retortillo/53422
     [Google Scholar]
  28. European Commission (1985) FP1-RADWASTOM 3C – Research and development programme (Euratom) on the management and storage of radioactive waste, 1985-1989, available at https://cordis.europa.eu/programme/rcn/43_en.htmlEuropean Commission (2017) – Statement, ‘Joint Statement of President Juncker, Prime Minister Rajoy and Prime Minister Costa on the amicable settlement concerning the Almaraz case’ http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-17-320_en.htm
  29. European Union (2014) ‘Directive 2014/52/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment’, Official Journal of the European Union (L 124, 25.04.2014), pp. 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. European Union Parliament (2018) ‘Parliamentary Questions’, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-2018-001120+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
  31. Fernandes, F., Barca, S. and Meira, T. (2018) ‘Nuclear waste storage near the Spanish frontier’, Environment Justice Atlas, available at https://ejatlas.org/print/nuclear-waste-storage-near-the-spanish-frontier-of-portugal.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Fernandes, F., Ribeiro, I. and Silva, L. (2018) ‘Abandoned uranium mines, Portugal’, Environment Justice Atlas, available at https://ejatlas.org/print/uranium-mining-canas-de-senhorim-portugal.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ferreira, A. P. (2017) ‘Almaraz: Portugal Considera “Adequada” E “Segura” Construção De Armazém De Resíduos Nucleares’ Expresso, available at http://expresso.sapo.pt/sociedade/2017-04-27-Almaraz-Portugal-considera-adequada-e-segura-construcao-de-armazem-de-residuos-nucleares.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Finzi, S. (1989) ‘European Community Research Programme on Radioactive Waste Management’, R – Waste Repository Technology ref_2 – Research and Management Policy Activities on Radioactive Wastes SMiRT 10 – Anaheim, CA, USA. August 22-27, available at http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.20/29866.
  35. Foro Nuclear (2017), ‘Ampliación del plazo para presentar las solicitudes de renovación de Almaraz y Vandellós II (2)’ Newsletter Flass Nuclear, Junio 2017, available at https://www.foronuclear.org/es/newsletters/junio-2017/123149-ampliacion-del-plazo-para-presentar-las-solicitudes-de-renovacion-de-almaraz-y-vandellos-ii-2.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Gaspar, J. (2018) ‘Portugal – Short Country Report’, in History of Nuclear Energy and Society (HoNESt) Consortium Deliverable 3.6, available at http://www.honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/PT.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jornal de Negocios (2017) ‘Almaraz: Queixa de Portugal já seguiu para Bruxelas’, available at http://www.jornaldenegocios.pt/economia/politica/detalhe/almaraz-queixa-de-portugal-ja-seguiu-para-bruxelas.
  38. Josephson, P. (2018) ‘United States – Short Country Report’, in History of Nuclear Energy and Society (HoNESt) Consortium Deliverable 3.6, available at http://www.honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/USA.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Junta de Energía Nuclear, (1969) Memoria de la Junta de Energía Nuclear 1968-1969 (Madrid).
     [Google Scholar]
  40. La Opinión de Zamora (2008) ‘Con la central nuclear, ahora seríamos el mejor pueblo de Zamora’ La Opinión de Zamora 17 august 2008, available at http://www.laopiniondezamora.es/comarcas/2008/08/17/central-nuclear-ahora-seriamos-mejor-pueblo-zamora/296259.html.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (2017), Atomic Energy Commission History, available at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/history.html.
  42. Menard, M., Prades, A., and Solá, R (1999) Analysis of the Institutional Communication Strategy of the Nuclear Safety Council in Spain. RISKPERCOM Common Case Study. Contribution to the Final Project Report. Ciemat Report. UE Contract F14P-T95-0016 (DG12-WSME).
  43. Nuclear Engineering International (1971), ‘High activity Release in Spain’, June 1971.
  44. Ropio, N. M. (2016) ‘Famílias das vítimas do urânio vão ser indemnizadas’, Jornal de Noticias, available at https://www.jn.pt/nacional/interior/familias-das-vitimas-do-uranio-vao-ser-indemnizadas-5026641.html.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Rubio-Varas, M.d.M et al.. (2018) ‘Spain-Short Country Report’, in: History of Nuclear Energy and Society (HoNESt) Consortium Deliverable 3.6, available at: http://www.honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/ES.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Silva, J. P. (2017) ‘A controvérsia em torno de Almaraz’, Plataforma Barómetro Social, Instituto de Sociología da Universidade do Porto. Available at http://www.barometro.com.pt/2017/04/17/a-controversia-em-torno-de-almaraz/.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. The Oxford Research Centre for the Humanities (TORCH) (2016) Environmental Humanities, available at http://www.torch.ox.ac.uk/envirohum.
  48. UNDP/World Bank (1984) Porgual. Issues and options in the energy sector, Report of the Joint UNDP/World Bank Energy Sector Assesment. Report Nº 4824-PO.
  49. Yuste, C. (2017) ‘Cientos de manifestantes de España y Portugal exigen el fin de las nucleares’ EFE Verde, available at https://www.efeverde.com/noticias/cientos-manifestantes-espana-portugal-exigen-fin-las-nucleares/.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. WISE (2018) New Uranium Mining Projects – Spain, available at http://www.wise-uranium.org/upes.html.
  51. Bibliography
    Araújo, P. and Mendes, J. M. (2013) ‘As minas de urânio em França e Portugal’, Cescontexto-estudos, N3, pp. 55–108.
  52. Barca, S., and Delicado, A. (2016) ‘Anti-Nuclear Mobilisation and Environmentalism in Europe: A View from Portugal (1976-1986)’, Environment and History, 22, 4, pp. 497–520.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Blansfield, J. (1987a) ‘Spain to relocate nuclear waste found stored in central Madrid’, Nucleonics Week, 28, 9, p. 5.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Blansfield, J. (1987b) ‘Enresea plan for spent fuel disposal sparks Spanish protests’, Nucleonics Week, 28, 18, p. 11.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Björk F, Eliasson P. and Poulsen B. (2009) Transcending Boundaries – Environmental histories from the Øresund Region, Malmö.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Brown, K. L. (2013). Plutopia: Nuclear families, atomic cities, and the great Soviet and American plutonium disasters, Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Calderón, F. J. (2015) ‘Reviewing the Spanish-Portuguese border: Conflict, interaction and cross-border cooperation’ Estudios Fronterizos, 16, 31, pp. 65–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Costa Morata, P. (2009) ‘La Transicion Ecológica en España, 1973-1983’, Sociedad y Utopía, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 33, pp. 265–285.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., and Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: an Essay on Technical Democracy, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Corral Broto, P. (2016) Protesta y ciudadanía. Conflictos ambientales durante el franquismo en Zaragoza (1939-1979), Aragón Con-temporáneo Nº5, Zaragoza.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Dahlkamp, F. J. (2016) Uranium deposits of the world. Europe, Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Díaz Díaz J. L., and López Jiménez, J. (1993), Dismantling and rehabi-litation programme of nuclear and radioactive facilities at the Spanish research centre (CIEMAT), available at: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/33/052/33052270.pdf.
  63. Dobado, R. (2006) ‘Geografía y desigualdad económica y demográfica de las provincias españolas (siglos XIX y XX)’, Investigaciones de historia económica, 5, pp. 133–170.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Estanqueiro, A. et al. (2008) ‘How to Prepare a Power System for 15% Wind Energy Penetration: the Portuguese Case Study’, Wind Energy, 11, 1, pp. 75–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Espluga Trenc, J., A. Prades, B. Medina, A. Presas, M. Rubio-Varas and J. De la Torre. (2017) ‘Las dimensiones sociales de la percepción de la energía nuclear. Un análisis del caso español (1960-2015)’, Revista Internacional de Sociología, 75, 4, e075.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Graça, C. (2017) ‘Nuclear, consciência e ativismo’, in António Eloy (ed.), Almaraz e outras coisas más. Caldas da Rainha: Gazeta das Caldas, pp. 58–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Gualda, E., Fragoso, A. and Lucio-Villegas, E. (2013) ‘The border, the people and the river: development of the cross-border area between southern Spain and Portugal’, Community Development Journal, 48, 1, pp. 23–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Guimarães, P. E. and Cebada, J. D. P. (eds) (2016) Conflitos Ambientais na Indústria Mineira e Metalúrgica: O Passado e o Presente. Évora.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Hamblin, J. D. (2008) Poison in the Well: Radioactive Waste in the Oceans at the Dawn of the Nuclear Age. New Jersey.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Hamilton, S. R. (2017) ‘Environmental Change and Protest in Franco’s Spain, 1939-1975’, Environmental History, 22, 2, pp. 257–281.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hecht, G. (2006) ‘Nuclear ontologies’, Constellations, 13, 3, pp. 320–331.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Hecht, G. (2014) Being Nuclear: Africans and the Global Uranium Trade, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Kaijser, A. and Meyer, J.-H. (2018a) ‘Nuclear Installations at the Border. Transnational connections and international implications. An Introduction’, Journal for the History of Environment and Society, 3, pp. 1–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Kaijser, A. and Meyer, J.-H. (2018b). ‘“The World’s Worst Located Nuclear Power Plant”: Danish and Swedish cross-border perspectives on the Barsebäck nuclear power plant’, Journal for the History of Environment and Society, 3, pp. 71–105.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Kalmbach, K. (2013) ‘Radiation and borders: Chernobyl as a national and transnational site of memory’, Global Environment, 6, 11, pp. 130–159.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Kirchhof, A. M. and Meyer, J.-H. (2014) ‘Global Protest against Nuclear Power. Transfer and Transnational Exchange in the 1970s and 1980s. Focus Issue’, Historical Social Research 39, 1, pp. 165–190.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Kirchhof, A. M. (2014) ‘Spanning the Globe: West-German Support for the Australian Anti-nuclear Movement’, Historical Social Research, 39, 1, pp. 254–273.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Kirchhof, A. M. (2018) ‘East-West German Transborder Entanglements through the Nuclear Waste Sites in Gorleben and Morsleben’, Journal for the History of Environment and Society 3, pp. 145–177.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Lorenzana, F and Mateos, F. J. (eds) (2008) Iberismo. Las relaciones entre España y Portugal. Historia y tiempo actual y otros estudios sobre Extremadura, Sociedad Extremeña de Historia.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Martin, M. I. and Hortelano, L. A. (2017) ‘Cohesión y convergencia en la frontera de Castilla y León con Portugal (1986-2016): Población, economía y territorio’ Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense, 37, 1, pp. 183–216.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Mendes, J. M. and Araújo, P. (2011) ‘Territórios contaminados, corpos contaminados: Estado, nuclearidade e cidadania em Portugal e França’, Configurações, 8, pp. 33–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Medeiros, E. J. (2010) ‘Old vs Recent Cross-border Cooperation: Portugal-Spain and Norway-Sweden’, Area 42, 4, pp. 434–443.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Meyer, J.-H. (2019) ‘Nature: From protecting Regional Landscapes to Regionalist Self-Assertion in the Age of the Global Environment’, in: Núñez Seixas, X. M. and Storm, E. (eds), Regionalism and Modern Europe: Regional Identity Construction and Regional Movements from 1890 until the Present, London, pp. 65–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Meyer J.-H. (2014) ‘“Where Do We Go from Wyhl?” Transnational Anti-Nuclear Protest Targeting European and International Organisations in the 1970s’, Historical Social Research 39, 1, pp. 212–235.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Meyer J.-H. (2013) ‘Challenging the Atomic Community. The European Environmental Bureau and the Europeanization of Anti-Nuclear Protest’, in: Kaiser, W. and Meyer, J.-H. (eds), Societal Actors in European Integration. Polity-Building and Policy-Making 1958-1992, Basingstoke, pp. 197–220.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Milder, S. (2014) ‘Between Grassroots Activism and Transnational Aspirations: Anti-Nuclear Protest from the Rhine Valley to the Bundestag, 1974-1983’, Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 39, 1, pp. 191–211.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Milder, S. (2017) Greening Democracy. The Anti-Nuclear Movement and Political Environmentalism in West Germany and Beyond, 1968-1983, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Müller B. (2013) ‘Anti-Nuclear Activism at the Czech-Austrian Border’, in: Bacas, J. L. and Kavanagh, W. (eds) Border Encounters – Asymmetry and Proximity at Europe’s Frontiers, New York, pp. 68–89.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Nielsen, H., and Knudsen, H. (2013) ‘Too Hot to Handle: The Controversial Hunt for Uranium in Greenland in the Early Cold War’, Centaurus, 55, 3, pp. 319–343.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Oberlé, C. (2016) ‘Civil Society and Nuclear Plants in Cross-Border Regions: The Mobilisation against Fessenheim and Cattenom Nuclear Power Stations’, Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal, 10, 2/3, pp. 194–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Oliveira, J. (2002) A Energia Nuclear em Portugal – Uma Esquina da História. Santarém.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Puig, A. P. I. (2005) ‘Science on the Periphery. The Spanish Reception of Nuclear Energy: An Attempt at Modernity?’ Minerva, 43, 2, pp. 197–218.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Renard C. Le (2018) ‘The Superphénix Fast Breeder Nuclear Reactor –Cross-Border Cooperation and Controversies’, Journal for the History of Environment and Society, 3, pp. 107–144.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Ramalho, A. J. G., Marques, J. G. and Cardeira, F. M., (1999) ‘The Portuguese research reactors: a tool for the next century’ IAEA-SM-360/5, available at: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/csp_004c/PDFfiles/005.pdf.
  95. Romero de Pablos, A. and Sánchez Ron, J. M. (2001) Energía nuclear en España. De la JEN al CIEMAT, Madrid.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Rubio-Varas, M.d.M and De la Torre, J. (eds) (2017) The Economic History of Nuclear Energy in Spain: Governance, Business and Finance, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Santos Oliveira, J. M. et al. (2002) ‘Diagnóstico Ambiental das Principais Áreas Mineiras Degradadas do Pais’ Separta do Boletim de Minas, 39, 2, pp. 67–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Santos Pereira, T., Carvalho, A., and Fonseca, P. F. C. (2017) ‘Imaginaries of nuclear energy in the Portuguese parliament: Between promise, risk, and democracy’, Public Understanding of Science, 26, 3, pp. 289–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Santos Pereira, T., Fonseca, P. F. C. and Carvalho, A. (2018) ‘Carnation Atoms? A History of Nuclear Energy in Portugal’, Minerva, on-line first (doi: 10.1007/s11024-018-9354-4).
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Saraiva, T (2016) ‘Fascist Modernist Landscapes: Wheat, Dams, Forests, and the Making of the Portuguese New State’, Environmental History, 21, 1, pp. 54–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Schneider, A., M. A. Friedl, D. K. McIver, and C. E. Woodcock (2003) ‘Mapping Urban Areas by Fusing Multiple Sources of Coarse Resolution Remotely Sensed Data’. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, pp. 1377–1386.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Schramm L. (2018) Evangelische Kirche und Anti-AKW-Bewegung. Das Beispiel der Hamburger Initiative kirchlicher Mitarbeiter und Gewaltfreie Aktion im Konflikt um das AKW Brokdorf 1976-1981, Göttingen.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Schüring M. (2015) “Bekennen gegen den Atomstaat”. Die evangelischen Kirchen in der Bundesrepublik und die Konflikte um die Atomenergie 1970-1990, Göttingen.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Tiggemann, A. (2004) Die “Achillesferse” der Kernenergie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: zur Kernenergiekontroverse und Geschichte der nuklearen Entsorgung von den Anfängen bis Gorleben, 1955 bis 1985, Lauf an der Pegnitz.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Tompkins, A. (2016a) “Better Active than Radioactive!” Anti-Nuclear Protest in 1970s France and West Germanyss, Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Tompkins, A. (2016b) ‘Grassroots Transnationalism(s): Franco-German Opposition to Nuclear Energy in the 1970s’, Contemporary European History, 25, 1, pp. 117–142.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Warde, P., Robin, L. and Sörlin, S., (2018) The Environment: A History of the Idea, Baltimore.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.116794
Loading
Siting (and mining) at the Border: Spain-Portugal Nuclear Transboundary Issues
https://doi.org/10.1484/J.JHES.5.116794
/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.116794
/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.116794
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv