oa Nuclear Installations at the Border. Transnational Connections and International Implications. An Introduction

References

1. Unpublished sources
   Allgeier H. (2016) Interview with Herbert Allgeier, former Director General in the European Commission, conducted by Jan-Henrik Meyer, 11 October 2016, Amberg. [soon available from: https://archives.eui.eu/en/oral_history]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beelitz, H. U. (1981) Vermerk für Herrn Narjes. Betr. Kernkraftwerke in Grenznähe. 30. 11.1981. Historical Archives of the European Commission BAC 35/1980 Cabinet Narjes (1975–1982)(2 Cross-border consultation on power stations), pp. 637–638.
3. Donogue JK., BNFL, Charlesworth FR, NII and Fairbarn A, SRD. (1977) “Safety Aspects of a Fuel Reprocessing Plant, IAEA-CN-36/76 (IV.3), Paper presented at the IAEA International Conference on Nuclear Energy and its Fuel Cycle, Salzburg, 1977”. National Archive, London AB 48/1565: 1–7.
   [Google Scholar]
4. European Environmental Bureau (1980) Mémorandum sur la Trilogie Nucléaire/Memorandum on the Nuclear Trilogy [4 resolutions on reprocessing, breeders and waste disposal republished in OJ C51, 29.02.1980], 20 March 1980. Historical Archives of the European Commission BAC 35/1980(20): 142–147.
5. Franklin, DNL, Nuclear Power Company Ltd. and Hill SJ, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority. (1977) Status and Programme for the Fast Breeder Reactor in the UK, IAEA-CN-36/54 (I.D), Paper presented at the IAEA International Conference on Nuclear Energy and its Fuel Cycle, Salzburg, 1977. National Archive, London AB 48/1565: 1–13.
6. Bibliography
   Alcalde, Á. (2018) ‘Spatializing transnational history: European spaces and territories’, European Review of History 25, 3-4, pp. 553–567.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Arnold, L. (2007) Windscale 1957. Anatomy of a Nuclear Accident, London.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bacas, J. L. and Kavanagh, W. (2013) ‘Introduction: Border Encounters – Asymmetry and Proximity at Europe’s Frontiers’, in: Bacas, J. L. and Kavanagh, W. (eds), Border Encounters – Asymmetry and Proximity at Europe’s Frontiers. New York, pp. 1–22.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bähr, P. (1970) ‘Was wird aus Euratom? Die Europäische Atomgemeinschaft in der Krisenzone’, Europa-Archiv 25, 3, pp. 81–90.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Beck, U. (1997) ‘Die Eröffnung des Welthorizontes: Zur Soziologie der Globalisierung’, Soziale Welt 47, 1, pp. 3–16.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Becker, J. (1980) ‘Nuclear Power: Border Problems’, Nature 288, 4 December, pp. 424–425.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bernhardt, C. (2016) Im Spiegel des Wassers. Eine transnationale Umweltgeschichte des Oberrheins (1800-2000), Cologne.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Betsill, M. M. and Corell, E. (2007) NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations, Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bösch, F. (2017) ‘Taming Nuclear Power: The Accident near Harrisburg and the Change in West German and International Nuclear Policy in the 1970s and early 1980s’, German History 35, 1, pp. 71–95.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bösch, F. (2018) ‘Internationale Solidarität im geteilten Deutschland. Konzepte und Praktiken’, in Bösch, F., Moine, C. and Senger, S. (eds), Internationale Solidarität. Globales Engagement in der Bundesrepublik und der DDR. Göttingen, pp. 7–34.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Brady, LM. (2008) ‘Life in the DMZ: Turning a Diplomatic Failure into an Environmental Success’, Diplomatic History 32, 4, pp. 585–611.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Brown, K. (2013) Plutopia: Nuclear Families, Atomic Cities, and the great Soviet and American plutonium disasters, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Butler, S. and Bud, R. (2018) United Kingdom Short Country Report (Update 2018). History of Nuclear Energy and Society (HoNESt) Consortium Deliverable Nº 3.6. http://www.honest2020.eu/sites/default/files/deliverables_24/UK.pdf (last accessed 17 October 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cioc, M. (2002) The Rhine. An Eco-Biography, 1815-2000, Seattle.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cioc, M. (2009) The Game of Conservation. International Treaties to protect the World’s Migratory Species, Athens, Ohio.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cisar, O. (2008) ‘Internationalization of Social Movements in the Czech Republic: The Case of the Anti-Temelín Campaign’, Polish Sociological Review (161), pp. 89–102.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Coates, P. (2014) ‘Borderland, No-Man’s Land, Nature’s Wonderland: Troubled Humanity and Untroubled Earth’. Environment and History 20, 4, pp. 499–516.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Commission, E[uropean]. (1979) ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the Introduction of a Community Consultation Procedure in Respect of Power Stations likely to affect the Territory of another Member State (submitted to the Council on 17 May 1979)’, Official Journal of the European Communities (OJEC) (C149, 15.6.1979), pp. 2–4.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Commoner, B. (1958) ‘The Fallout Problem’. Science 127, 3305, pp. 1023–1026.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Cunningham, H. (2012) ‘Permeabilities, Ecology and Geopolitical Boundaries’, in: Wilson, T. M. and Donnan, H. (eds) A Companion to Border Studies, Chichester, pp. 371–386.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Cyrus, N. (2017) ‘Conceptualising Borders’, Paper presented at the conference Siting Nuclear Installations at the border. Transnational political implications and societal responses. Berlin, Humboldt-Universität, 20 November 2017.
27. Di Fiore, L. (2017) ‘The production of borders in nineteenth-century Europe: between institutional boundaries and transnational practices of space’, European Review of History 24, 1, pp. 36–57.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Dietze, A. and Naumann, K. (2018) ‘Revisiting transnational actors from a spatial perspective’, European Review of History 25, 3-4, pp. 415–430.
    [Google Scholar]
29. dpa. (2018) ‘Pannengeplagtes Atomkraftwerk: Rheinland-Pfalz und Saarland verzichten auf Klage gegen AKW Cattenom. Laut einem Gutachten ist das französische AKW Cattenom gefährlich. Vor Gericht gehen die Nachbarn Rheinland-Pfalz und das Saarland trotzdem nicht’. Handelsblatt, 16 April 2018, http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/pannenge-plagtes-atomkraftwerk-rheinland-pfalz-und-saarland-verzichten-auf-klage-gegen-akw-cattenom/21179920.html (last accessed 17 October 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Eckert, A. M. (2011) ‘Greetings from the Zonal Border’. Tourism to the Iron Curtain in West Germany. Studies in Contemporary History 8, 1, pp. 9–36.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Eckert, A. M. (2014) ‘Geteilt, aber nicht unverbunden. Grenzgewässer als deutsch-deutsches Umweltproblem’, Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte 62, 1, pp. 69–100.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Eckert, A. M. (forthcoming 2019) West Germany and the Iron Curtain. Environment, Economy & Culture in the Borderlands, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Engels, J. I. (2006) Naturpolitik in der Bundesrepublik. Ideenwelt und politische Verhaltensstile in Naturschutz und Umweltbewegung 1950-1980, Paderborn.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Flam, H. (1994) States and Anti-Nuclear Movements, Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gaumer, J. (2017), ‘“Was hat die Wiederaufbereitungsanlage mit Frieden zu tun?” AtomkraftgegnerInnen, FriedensaktivistInnen und der gemeinsame “Widerstand” gegen nukleare Bedrohungsszenarien in den 1980er Jahren’, in: Kemper, C. (ed.) Gespannte Verhältnisse. Frieden und Protest in Europa während der 1970er und 1980er Jahre. Essen, 223–247.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Gaumer, J. (2018), Wackersdorf. Atomkraft und Demokratie in der Bundesrepublik 1980-1989, Munich.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hamblin, J. D. (2008) Poison in the Well. Radioactive Waste in the Oceans at the Dawn of the Nuclear Age, New Brunswick, NJ.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hamblin, J. D. (2013) Arming Mother Nature. The Birth of Catastrophic Environmentalism, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hasenöhrl, U. (2011) Zivilgesellschaft und Protest. Eine Geschichte der Naturschutz- und Umweltbewegung in Bayern 1945-1980, Göttingen.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hecht, G. (2006a) ‘Negotiating Global Nuclearities. Apartheid, Decoloni-zation, and the Cold War in the Making of the IAEA’, Osiris 21, 1, pp. 25–48.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hecht, G. (2006b) ‘Nuclear Ontologies’, Constellations 13, 3, pp. 320–331.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Högselius, P., Kaijser, A. and Vleuten, E. van der (2016) Europe’s Infrastructure Transition. Economy, War, Nature, Basingstoke.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Houtum, H. V. (2015) ‘The Geopolitics of Borders and Boundaries’, Geopolitics 10, 4, pp. 672–679.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hummer, W. (2008) ‘Temelín: Das Kernkraftwerk an der Grenze’, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 63, 4, pp. 501–557.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Iriye, A. and Saunier, P.-Y. (eds) (2009) The Palgrave Dictionary of Transnational History, Basingstoke.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Jahn, D. (2000) Die Lernfähigkeit politischer Systeme. Zur Institution-alisierung ökologischer Standpunkte in Schweden und der Bundes-republik Deutschland, Baden-Baden.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Jasanoff, S. and Kim S.-H. (eds) (2015) Dreamscapes of Modernity. Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Jonter, T. (2016) The Key to Nuclear Restraint. The Swedish Plans to Acquire Nuclear Weapons During the Cold War, Basingstoke.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Josephson, P. R. (2009) Would Trotsky Wear a Bluetooth? Technological Utopianism under Socialism, 1917-1989, Baltimore.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Jungk, R. (1977) Der Atomstaat. Vom Fortschritt in die Unmenschlichkeit, München.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kaelble, H. (2017) ‘Comparative and Transnational History’, Ricerche di storia politica 20, 4, pp. 15–24.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kaijser A. (1992) ‘Redirecting Power: Swedish Nuclear Power Policies in Historical Perspective’, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 17, pp. 437–462.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Kaijser A. (2013) ”Under a Common Acid Sky. Negotiating Trans-boundary Air Pollution in Europe”, in: Disco, N. and Kranakis E. (eds.), Cosmopolitan Commons. Sharing Resources and Risks across Borders, Cambridge, MA, pp. 213–242.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Kaijser, A. and Meyer, J.-H. (2018) ‘“The World’s Worst Located Nuclear Power Plant”: Danish and Swedish cross-border perspectives on the Barsebäck nuclear power plant’, Journal for the History of Environment and Society 3, pp. 71–105.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kekk, M. E. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in Global Politics, Ithaca.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kirchhof, A. M. (2014) ‘Spanning the Globe: West-German Support for the Australian Anti-nuclear Movement’, Historical Social Research 39, 1, pp. 254–273.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Kirchhof, A. M. (2018) ‘East-West German Transborder Entanglements through the Nuclear Waste Sites in Gorleben and Morsleben’, Journal for the History of Environment and Society 3 pp. 145–177.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Kirchhof, A. M. and Meyer, J.-H. (2014) ‘Global Protest Against Nuclear Power. Transfer and Transnational Exchange in the 1970s and 1980s. Focus Issue’. Historical Social Research 39, 1, pp. 163–273.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kloepfer, M. and Kohler, C. (1981) Kernkraftwerk und Staatsgrenze: völkerrechtliche, verfassungsrechtliche, europarechtliche, kollisions- und haftungsrechtliche Fragen grenznaher Kernkraftwerke, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Komlosy, A. (2018) Grenzen. Räumliche und soziale Grenzen im Zeitverlauf, Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Krige, J. (2006) ‘Atoms for Peace, Scientific Internationalism, and Scientific Intelligence’, Osiris 21, 1, pp. 161–181.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Krige, J. (2008) ‘The Peaceful Atom as Political Weapon: Euratom and American Foreign Policy in the Late 1950s’, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 38, 1, pp. 5–44.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Krige, J. and Wang, J. (2015) ‘Nation, Knowledge, and Imagined Futures: Science, Technology, and Nation-Building, Post-1945’, History and Technology 31, 3, pp. 171–179.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Kupper, P. (2003) Atomenergie und gespaltene Gesellschaft. Die Geschichte des gescheiterten Projektes Kernkraftwerk Kaiseraugst, Zürich.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Laucht, C. (2016) ‘Scientists, the Public, the State and the Debate over the Environmental and Human Health Effects of Nuclear Testing in Britain, 1950-1958’. The Historical Journal 59, 1, pp. 221–251.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Le Renard, C. (2018) ‘The Superphénix fast breeder nuclear reactor – cross-border cooperation and controversies’, Journal for the History of Environment and Society 3, pp. 107–144.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mallard, G. (2009) ‘L’Europe puissance nucléaire, cet obscur objet du désir’, Critique internationale 42, 1, pp. 141–163.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Mallard, G. (2014) ‘Crafting the Nuclear Regime Complex (1950-1975): Dynamics of Harmonization of Opaque Treaty Rules’, European Journal of International Law 25, 2, pp. 445–472.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Mastny, V. (2008) ‘The 1963 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: A Missed Opportunity for Détente?’ Journal of Cold War Studies 10, 1, pp. 3–25.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Mateos, G. and Suárez-Díaz, E. (2016) ‘Atoms for Peace in Latin America’, in: Beezley, W. (ed.) Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History, Oxford, pp. 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Merlin, M. D. and Gonzalez, R. M. (2010) ‘Environmental impacts of nuclear testing in remote Oceania, 1946-96’, in: McNeill, J. R. and Unger, C. R. (eds) Environmental Histories of the Cold War. Cambridge, pp. 167–202.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Metzger, B. (2015) “Erst stirbt der Wald, dann du!”. Das Waldsterben als westdeutsches Politikum (1978-1986), Frankfurt.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Meyer, J.-H. (2014a) ‘Transnationale Geschichte. Eine Perspektive’, His-torische Mitteilungen der Ranke-Gesellschaft HMRG 26, pp. 145–161.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Meyer, J.-H. (2014b) ‘“Where do we go from Wyhl?” Transnational Anti-Nuclear Protest targeting European and International Organi-sations in the 1970s’, Historical Social Research 39, 1, pp. 212–235.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Meyer, J.-H. (2017) ‘From Nature to Environment: International Organizations and Environmental Protection before Stockholm’, in: Kaiser, W. and Meyer, J.-H. (eds) International Organizations and Environmental Protection. Conservation and Globalization in the Twentieth Century. New York, pp. 31–73.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Mez, L. (1979a) Der Atomkonflikt: Atomindustrie, Atompolitik und Anti-Atom-Bewegung im internationalen Vergleich, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Mez, L. (1979b) Energiediskussion in Europa. Berichte und Dokumente über die Haltung der Regierungen und Parteien in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zur Kernenergie, Villingen.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Middell, M. and Naumann, K. (2010) ‘Global History and the Spatial Turn. From the Impact of Area Studies to the Study of Critical Junctures of Globalization’, Journal of Global History 5, 1, pp. 149–170.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Milder, S. (2017) Greening Democracy. The Anti-Nuclear Movement and Political Environmentalism in West Germany and Beyond, 1968-1983, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Müller, B. (2013) ‘Anti-Nuclear Activism at the Czech-Austrian Border’, in: Bacas, J. L. and Kavanagh, W. (eds) Border Encounters – Asymmetry and Proximity at Europe’s Frontiers. New York, pp. 68–89.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Müller, M. G. and Torp, C. (2009) ‘Conceptualising transnational spaces in history’, European Review of History 16(5), pp. 609–617.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Nelkin, D. and Pollak, M. (1981) The Atom Besieged: Extraparliamentary Dissent in France and Germany: Boston.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Nielsen, H. and Knudsen, H. (2010) ‘The troublesome life of peaceful atoms in Denmark’, History and Technology 26, 2, pp. 91–118.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Nielsen, H. and Knudsen, H. (2013) ‘Too Hot to Handle: The Contro-versial Hunt for Uranium in Greenland in the Early Cold War’, Centaurus 55, 3, pp. 319–343.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Nielsen, H., Nielsen, K., Petersen, F., et al. (1999) ‘Risø and the Attempts to Introduce Nuclear Power into Denmark’, Centaurus 41, 1-2, pp. 64–92.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Nielsen, J. S. (2000) ‘Barsebäck-sagens alt for stille diplomati’, Information 19 February 2000. Copenhagen. https://www.information.dk/2000/02/barseback-sagens-stille-diplomati (last accessed 2 October 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
87. Nye, J. S. and Keohane, R. O. (1971) ‘Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction’, International Organization 25, 3, pp. 329–349.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Oberlé, C. (2016) ‘Civil Society and Nuclear Plants in cross-border Regions: the Mobilisation against Fessenheim and Cattenom Nuclear Power Stations’, Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal 10, 2/3, pp. 194–208.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Offe, C. (1985) ‘New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics’, Social Research 52, 4, pp. 817–868.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Paasi, A. (2015) ‘Generations and the “Development” of Border Studies’, Geopolitics 10, 4, pp. 663–671.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Park, S. (2009) ‘Internationalism’, in: Iriye, A. and Saunier P.-Y. (eds) The Palgrave Dictionary of Transnational History. Basingstoke, pp. 586–590.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Pelzer, N. (1987) Friedliche Kernenergienutzung und Staatsgrenzen in Mitteleuropa: Tagungsbericht der AIDN/INLA Regionaltagung am 22. und 23. September 1986 in Regensburg, Baden-Baden.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Radkau, J. (1983) Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Atomwirtschaft 1945-1975. Verdrängte Alternativen in der Kerntechnik und der Ursprung der nuklearen Kontroverse, Reinbek.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Rengeling, H.-W. (1986) ‘Rechtsprobleme grenzüberschreitender Standort-planung’, in: Pelzer, N. (ed.) Friedliche Kernenergienutzung und Staatsgrenzen in Mitteleuropa. Baden-Baden, pp. 31–61.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Roehrlich, E. (2016) ‘The Cold War, the developing world, and the creation of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), 1953-1957’, Cold War History 16, 2, pp. 195–212.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Rothschild, R. (2013) ‘Environmental Awareness in the Atomic Age: Radioecologists and Nuclear Technology’, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 43, 4, pp. 492–530.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Rothschild, R. (2014) ‘Burning Rain: The Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Project’, in: Fleming, J. R. and Johnson, A. (eds) Toxic Airs: Chemical and Environmental Histories of the Atmosphere. Pittsburgh, pp. 181–207.
    [Google Scholar]
98. Rubio-Varas, M.d.M., Carvalho, A. and Torre, J.d.l. (2018) ‘Siting (and mining) at the border: Spain-Portugal nuclear transboundary issues’, Journal for the History of Environment and Society 3, pp. 33–69.
    [Google Scholar]
99. Rucht, D. (1980) Von Wyhl nach Gorleben. Bürger gegen Atomprogramm und nukleare Entsorgung, Munich.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Rucht, D. (1988) ‘Gegenöffentlichkeit und Gegenexperten. Zur Institutionalisierung des Widerspruchs in Politik und Recht’, Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 9, 2, pp. 290–305.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Rucht, D. (1994) Modernisierung und neue soziale Bewegungen: Deutschland, Frankreich und USA im Vergleich, Frankfurt.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Rucht, D. (1995) ‘The Impact of Anti-Nuclear Movements in International Comparison’, in: Bauer, M. (ed.) Resistance to new technology. Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology. Cambridge, pp. 277–291.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Rucht, D. (1999) ‘The Transnationalization of Social Movements: Trends, Causes, Problems’, in: DellaPorta, D., Kriesi, H. and Rucht, D. (eds) Social movements in a globalizing world. Basingstoke, pp. 206–222.
     [Google Scholar]
104. Rucht, D. (2002) ‘Mobilization Against Large Techno-Industrial Projects: A Comparative Perspective’, Mobilization: An Interna-tional Quarterly 7, 1, pp. 79–95.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Schmidt, S. D. (2011) ‘Nuclear Colonization? Soviet Technopolitics in the Second World’, in: Hecht, G. (ed.) Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War. Cambridge, MA, pp. 125–154.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Scott, J. W. (2012) ‘European Politics of Borders, Border Symbolism and Cross-Border Cooperation’, in: Wilson, T. M. and Donnan, H. (eds) A Companion to Border Studies. Chichester, pp. 83–99.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Spiegel, D. (1976) Atomenergie: Harter Einsatz. Der Spiegel, 13 December 1976, pp. 77–80. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-41066339.html (last accessed 18 October 2018).
     [Google Scholar]
108. Struck, B., Ferris, K. and Revel, J. (2011) ‘Introduction: Space and Scale in Transnational History’, The International History Review 33, 4, pp. 573–584.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Tauer, S. (2012a) ‘Das Stereotyp des naturliebenden Deutschen: Wahrnehmung und Selbstwahrnehmung beim Ausbau der Kernenergie am Oberrhein’, in: Pfeil, U. (ed.) Mythes et tabous des relations franco-allemandes au 20^e siècle. Bern, pp. 141–156.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Tauer S. (2012b) Störfall für die gute Nachbarschaft? Deutsche und Franzosen auf der Suche nach einer gemeinsamen Energiepolitik (1973-1980), Göttingen.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Taylor, I. I. I. J. E. (2008) ‘Boundary Terminology’, Environmental History 13, 3, pp. 454–481.
     [Google Scholar]
112. Tompkins, A. (2016a) “Better Active than Radioactive!” Anti-Nuclear Protest in 1970s France and West Germany, Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
113. Tompkins, A. (2016b) ‘Grassroots Transnationalism(s): Franco-German Opposition to Nuclear Energy in the 1970s’, Contemporary European History 25, 1, pp. 117–142.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Torre, A. (2008) ‘A “Spatial Turn” in History? Landscapes, Visions, Resources’, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 63, 5, pp. 1127–1144.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Uekötter, F. (2017) ‘Myths, Big Myths and Global Environmentalism’, in: Berger, S. and Nehring, H. (eds) The History of Social Movements in Global Perspective. A Survey. London, pp. 419–447.
     [Google Scholar]
116. Vleuten, E. van der and Kaijser, A. (2006) Networking Europe: transnational infrastructures and the shaping of Europe. 1850-2000, Sagamore Beach.
     [Google Scholar]
117. Vleuten, E.van der (2008) Toward a Transnational History of Technology: Meanings, Promises, Pitfalls. Technology and Culture 49, 4, pp. 974–994.
     [Google Scholar]
118. Vleuten, E. van der and Feys, T. (2016) ‘Borders and Frontiers in Global and Transnational History. Introduction’, Journal of Modern European History 14, 1, pp. 29–34.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Weitbrecht, D. (2012) Aufbruch in die Dritte Welt. Der Internationalismus der Studentenbewegung von 1968 in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Göttingen.
     [Google Scholar]
120. Williams, R. W. (1997) ‘Intergovernmental Conflict over Emergency Planning: The Politics of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant’, Polity 30, 2, pp. 285–314.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Wilson, T. M. and Donnan, H. (eds) (2012) A Companion to Border Studies, Chichester.
     [Google Scholar]
122. Wirth, J. D. (2000) Smelter Smoke in North America. The Politics of Transborder Pollution, Lawrence.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Worster, D. (1994 [1977]) Nature’s Economy. A History of Ecological Ideas, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
124. Worster, D. (2016) Shrinking the Earth. The Rise and Decline of American Abundance, Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
125. Yellin, J. and Joskow, P. J. (1979) ‘Siting Nuclear Power Plants’, Working Paper, MIT, Department of Economics (245, August), pp. 1–120.
     [Google Scholar]
126. Zaretsky, N. (2018) Radiation Nation. Three Mile Island and the Political Transformation of the 1970s, New York.
     [Google Scholar]