Skip to content
1882
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2506-6730
  • E-ISSN: 2506-6749

Abstract

Abstract

The current pandemic strikingly reveals that the spread of the Sars-CoV-2 virus is inextricably intertwined in human practices. It is transmitted through everyday routines and understood though practices of scientific research. While praxeology as a theoretical approach is often used in historical research to analyze social phenomena, it also provides a useful perspective on socio-environmental change, such as the spread of diseases. With a focus on human practices, this essay rejects notions subsumed under buzzwords like ‘New Materialism’ or ‘Post-Humanism’ which attribute ‘agency’ to entities such as viruses. Instead, it contends that while viruses do evolve beyond human control and have a significant impact on society, this impact is not only tied to human activities, but that humans are able to actively alter the course of the pandemic by reflecting on the nexus between practices and viruses. This article illustrates these mechanisms with examples from the current pandemic and the longer history of hygiene in the nineteenth century.

Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122471
2020-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Evans, R. (1987) Death in Hamburg. Society and Politics in the Cholera Years 1830–1910, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Haumann, S. (2020) ‘Materiality and Practice Theory’, in: Haumann, S., Knoll, M., and Mares, D. (eds), Concepts of Urban-Environmental History, Bielefeld, pp. 5164.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Itzen, P., and Müller, S. (2016) ‘Risk as a Category of Analysis for a Social History of the Twentieth Century. An Introduction’, Historical Social Research/ Historische Sozialforschung, 41, pp. 729.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rheinberger, H. (2001) Experimentalsysteme und epistemische Dinge. Eine Geschichte der Proteinsynthese im Reagenzglas, Göttingen.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Røpke, I. (2009) ‘Theories of Practice. New Inspiration for Ecological Economic Studies on Consumption’, Ecological Economics, 68, pp. 24902497.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Schatzki, T. (2003) ‘Nature and Technology in History’, History and Theory, 42, pp. 8293.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Schott, D. (2014) Europäische Urbanisierung (1000–2000). Eine umwelthistorische Einführung, Cologne.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Shove, E., Pantzar, M., and Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice. Everyday Life and How it Changes, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Welskopp, T. (2001) ‘Die Dualität von Struktur und Handeln. Anthony Giddens’ Strukturierungstheorie als “praxeologischer” Ansatz in der Geschichtswissenschaft’, in: Suter, A., and Hettling, M. (eds), Struktur und Ereignis, Göttingen, pp. 99119.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Winiwarter, V., and Schmid, M. (2020) ‘Socio-Natural Sites’, in: Haumann, S., Knoll, M., and Mares, D. (eds), Concepts of Urban-Environmental History, Bielefeld, pp. 3350.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zachmann, K. (2014) ‘Risk in Historical Perspective. Concepts, Contexts, and Conjunctions’, in: Klüppelberg, C., Straub, D., and Welpe, I. (eds), Risk. A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Cham, pp. 336.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122471
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv