Skip to content
1882
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2506-6730
  • E-ISSN: 2506-6749
file format pdf download PDF
read_more Read

Abstract

Abstract

Future historians writing about the COVID-19 crisis will need to pay more attention to the atmosphere and its role in the current crisis, for the atmosphere is connected to the current pandemic in multiple ways: the atmosphere transports aerosols; it changes as a consequence of the social crisis; air pollution and COVID-19 deaths seem to be connected; there is a triple crisis of ‘oxygen-depriving politics’; and air travel has a large effect on the transmission of the disease. Increasingly, atmosphere scientists are contributing to the science of COVID-19. Dealing with the atmosphere is useful for another reason too: in the current age, atmosphere physicists and chemists have become key architects of the Anthropocene concept, and the meteorological sciences are increasingly claiming a stake in the environmental humanities. Environmental historians who attribute a larger role to the atmosphere should follow recent trends in the larger ‘geohumanities’, a new field that has exported the meteorologists’ atmosphere into the humanities. At the same time, environmental historians could also benefit from engaging with the history of knowledge about air, not just late modern meteorology, but also early modern physics and chemistry, and the pre-nineteenth century medical sciences that were less hesitant about dealing with the air. Historians should acquire what I call an ‘atmospheric sensibility’ by looking at the sensibility of atmosphere scientists of the past. Obtaining this sensibility entails observing the way in which meteorological experts have used this knowledge to expand their discipline, in both the scientific and public realm. This knowledge can then be put to use to both create and strengthen specific themes in the environmental history of health. Areas of research could include, among many other possibilities, the difference between indoor and open-air work, or the importance of respiration, physiology and lung medicine in history. First acquiring and then deepening our atmospheric sensibility will provide a better understanding of the environmental history of health and pandemics in the current geological epoch.

© Brepols Publishers NV
Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122474
2020-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bibliography
    (2017) ‘Welcome to The Lancet Planetary Health’, The Lancet Planetary Health. 1, 1, p. e1, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542–5196(17)30013-X.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adey, P. (2015) ‘Air’s Affinities: Geopolitics, Chemical Affect and the Force of the Elemental’, Dialogues in Human Geography, 5, 1, pp. 54–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, K. (2010) Predicting the Weather. Victorians and the Science of Meteorology, Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, S., Güttler, N., and Schlünder, M. (2019) ‘Encounters in Borderlands’, Environmental Humanities, 11, 2, pp. 247–279.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonneuil, C., and Fressoz, J.-B. (2015) The Shock of the Anthropocene. The Earth, History and Us, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Callon, M. (1986) ‘Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, in Law, J. (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge?, London, pp. 196–223.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Coccia, E. (2019) The Life of Plants. A Metaphysics of Mixture, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Coen, D. R. (2018) Climate in Motion. Science, Empire and the Problem of Scale, Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Coen, D. R. (2019) ‘Advent of Climate Science’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science, pp. 1–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cole, M. A., Ozgen, C., and Strobl, E. (2020) ‘Air Pollution Exposure and COVID-19’, IZA Discussion Paper Series, 13367.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dettelbach, M. (1999) ‘The Face of Nature: Precise Measurement, Mapping and Sensibility in the Work of Alexander von Humboldt’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences, 30, pp. 473–504.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Dongen, J. van, and Paul, H. (2017) Epistemic Virtues in the Sciences and the Humanities, Cham.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dorno, C. (1924) ‘Die physikalischen Grundlagen der Sonnen- und Himmelsstrahlung und ihre Anwendung in der Therapie’, Die Naturwissenschaften, 12, 47, pp. 1068–1075.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Engelmann, S. (2015) ‘Toward a Poetics of Air: Sequencing and Surfacing Breath’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 3, pp. 430–444.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fleming, J. R. (2016) Inventing atmospheric science. Bjerknes, Rossby, Wexler, and the foundations of modern meteorology, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ford, T. H. (2018) Wordsworth and the Poetics of Air. Atmospheric Romanticism in a Time of Climate Change, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Golinski, J. (2011) British Weather and the Climate of Enlightenment, Chicago.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Greene, M. T. (2015) Alfred Wegener: Science, Exploration, and the Theory of Continental Drift, Baltimore.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Haegens, K. (2020) ‘2020: het jaar van de zuurstofpolitiek’, De Volkskrant, 3 September 2020, p. 21.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Haraway, D. (2016) Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Haraway, D. (2017) ‘Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin’, Multitudes, 65, 4, pp. 75–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Heggie, V. (2019) Higher and Colder. A History of Extreme Physiology and Exploration, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Höhler, S. (2010) ‘The Environment as a Life Support System: The Case of Biosphere 2’, History and Technology, 26, 1, pp. 39–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Horn, E. (2018) ‘Air as Medium’, Grey Room, 73, pp. 6–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jankovic, V. (2010) Confronting the Climate. British Airs and the Making of Environmental Medicine, New York.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Jankovic, V. (2018) ‘History of Climate Futures: Science, Culture and Policy in the Atmospheric Humanities’, Conference ‘Imagining the History of the Future: Unsettling Scientific Stories’, 27–28 March 2018, York.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jankovic, V., and Vlahakis, G. (2020) ‘Launching the Atmospheric Humanities’, History of Meteorology, http://meteohistory.org/2019/launching-the-atmospheric-humanities/.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuklick, H., and Kohler, R. E. (1996) ‘Introduction’, Osiris, 11, pp. 1–14.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lenton, T. M., Dutreuil, S., and Latour, B. (2020) ‘Life on Earth is Hard to Spot’, The Anthropocene Review, 7, 3, pp. 248–272.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Maher, N. M. (2017) Apollo in the Age of Aquarius, Cambridge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mbembe, A. (2020) ‘The universal right to breath’, Critical Inquiry, https://critinq.wordpress.com/2020/04/13/the-universal-right-to-breathe/.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McCormack, D. P. (2018) Atmospheric Things. On the Allure of Elemental Envelopment, Durham.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mitman, G. (2007) Breathing Space. How Allergies Shape Our Lives and Landscapes, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Mitman, G., and Numbers, R. L. (2016) ‘From Miasma to Asthma: The Changing Fortunes of Medical Geography in America’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 25, 3, pp. 391–412.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mitman, G., Murphy, M., and Sellers, C. (2004) ‘Introduction: A Cloud over History’, Osiris, 19, 1, pp. 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Nieuwenhuis, M. (2016) ‘Introduction: Atmospheric Politics and State Governance’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 9, 3, pp. 478–481.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nullis, C. (2020) ‘COVID-19 impacts observing system’, WMO, https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/covid-19-impacts-observing-system.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Oreskes, N. (2001) ‘From Continental Drift to Plate Tectonics’, in: Oreskes, N. (ed.), Plate Tectonics. An Insider’s History of the Modern History of the Earth, Boulder, pp. 3–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Prather, K. A., Wang, C. C., and Schooley, R. T. (2020) ‘Reducing Transmission of SARS-CoV-2’, Science, 368, 6498, 1422–1424.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Raby, M. (2017) ‘The Colonial Origins of Tropical Field Stations’, American Scientist, 105, 4, pp. 216–223.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Regener, E. (1946) ‘Über das “photochemische” Klima der Erde’, Die Naturwissenschaften, 6, pp. 163–166.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Richter, L. (2019) Semiotik, Physik, Organik. Ein Geschichte des Wissens vom Wetter (1750–1850), Frankfurt am Main.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rizzo, C., et al. (2016) Aerocene, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Roberts, L. (1995) ‘The Death of the Sensuous Chemist: The “New” Chemistry and the Transformation of Sensuous Technology’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 26, 4, pp. 503–529.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Rozwadowski, H. M. (2013) ‘The Promise of Ocean History for Environmental History’, Journal of American History, 100, 1, pp. 136–139.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Shapin, S., and Schaffer, S. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life, Princeton.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Skydsgaard, M. A. (2010) ‘It’s Probably in the Air: Medical Meteorology in Denmark, 1810–1875’, Medical History, 54, 2, pp. 215–236.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Sloterdijk, P. (2009) ‘Airquakes’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 1, pp. 41–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Spevack, B. (2020) Animal Smuggling in Air Transport and Preventing Zoonotic Animals, Washington.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Steffen, W., et al. (2020) ‘The Emergence and Evolution of Earth System Science’, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1, 1, pp. 54–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Stoler, A. L. (2010) Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense, Princeton.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Thompson, D. (2020) ‘Mask Up and Shut Up, COVID-19 Transmission Would Go Down If We Spoke Less or Less Loudly in Public Spaces. Why Aren’t More People Saying So?’, The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/08/wear-your-mask-and-stop-talking/615796/.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Tironi, M. (2014) ‘Hacia una política atmosférica: Químicos, afectos y cuidado en Puchuncaví’, Pléyade, 14, pp. 165–189.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Vetter, J. (2011) ‘Introduction’, in Vetter, J. (ed.), Knowing global environments. New historical perspectives on the field sciences, Piscataway, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. White, S., Pfister, C., and Mauelshagen, F. (eds) (2018) The Palgrave Handbook of Climate History, London.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Worboys, M. (2011) ‘Practice and the Science of Medicine in the Nineteenth Century’, Isis, 102, 1, pp. 109–115.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Unpublished Sources
    Berlin, Erich Regener Papers: Archive of the Max Planck Society (ERP-AMPS), II.Rep.37.10, Public lecture ‘Übersicht über die physikalischen Eigenschaften der biologisch, inbesondere der medizinisch wichtigen Strahlen’, Stuttgart, May 30th, 1931.
/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122474
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv