Wet Shoes, Dirty Coats, and the Agency of Things: Thinking Personification through New Materialism

References

1. Primary Sources
   Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus, The Consolation of Philosophy, trans. by Victor Watts (London: Penguin, 1999)
   [Google Scholar]
2. Hildegard von Bingen, Physica, trans. by Priscilla Throop (Rochester: Healing Arts Press, 1998)
   [Google Scholar]
3. Hugh of St Victor, The Didascalicon, ed. and trans. by Jerome Taylor (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991)
   [Google Scholar]
4. Langland, William, The Vision of Piers Plowman, ed. by A. V. C. Schmidt (London: Everyman, 1995)
   [Google Scholar]
5. Langland, William, Piers Plowman: A New Annotated Edition of the C-Text, ed. by Derek Pearsall (Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2008)
   [Google Scholar]
6. Walafrid Strabo, Hortulus: De cultura hortulum (The Little Garden), trans. by Raef Payne, in Medieval Medicine: A Reader, ed. by Faith Wallis (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010), pp. 98–109
   [Google Scholar]
7. Secondary Sources
   Aers, David, Sanctifying Signs: Making Christian Tradition in Medieval England (South Bend: Notre Dame University Press, 2004)
   [Google Scholar]
8. Alaimo, Stacy, and Susan Hekman, ‘Introduction: Emerging Models of Materiality in Feminist Theory’, in Material Feminisms, ed. by Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008), pp. 1–19
   [Google Scholar]
9. Alford, John A., ‘Haukyn’s Coat: Some Observations on Piers Plowman B.XIV.22–7’, Medium Aevum, 43 (1974), 133–38
   [Google Scholar]
10. Andriaenssen, H. T., Representation and Scepticism from Aquinas to Descartes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
11. Akbari, Suzanne Conklin, Seeing through the Veil: Optical Theory and Medieval Allegory (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004)
    [Google Scholar]
12. Astell, Ann, Response to Lawrence Clopper, ‘Langland and Allegory: A Proposition’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 15 (2001), 43–46
    [Google Scholar]
13. Barad, Karen, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
14. Barney, Stephen A., The Penn Commentary on ‘Piers Plowman’: C Passus 20–22; B-Passus 18–20 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006)
    [Google Scholar]
15. Barrett, Estelle, and Barbara Bolt, Carnal Knowledge: Towards a ‘New Materialism’ through the Arts (London: Taurus, 2012)
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bennet, Jane, Vibrant Matter (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009)
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bennet, Jane, ‘Systems and Things: On Vital Materialism and Object-Oriented Philosophy’, in The Nonhuman Turn, ed. by Richard Grusin (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015), pp. 223–39
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bloomfield, Morton, ‘A Grammatical Approach to Personification Allegory’, Modern Philology, 60 (1963), 161–71
    [Google Scholar]
19. Braidotti, Rosi, Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming (Cambridge: Polity, 2002)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Breen, Katharine, Imagining an English Reading Public, 1150–1400 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)
    [Google Scholar]
21. Brower, Jeffrey E., Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism and Material Objects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)
    [Google Scholar]
22. Bynum, Caroline Walker, The Resurrection of the Body in Western Christianity, 200–1336 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995)
    [Google Scholar]
23. Calabrese, Michael, ‘Posthuman Piers? Rediscovering Langland’s Subjectivities’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 32 (2018), 3–36
    [Google Scholar]
24. Carruthers, Mary, The Book of Memory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)
    [Google Scholar]
25. Carruthers, Mary, ‘Allegory without the Teeth: Reflections on Figural Language in Piers Plowman’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 19 (2005), 27–43
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chen, Mel Y., Animacies (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012)
    [Google Scholar]
27. Clopper, Lawrence, ‘Langland and Allegory: A Proposition’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 15 (2001), 35–42
    [Google Scholar]
28. Cornish, Alison, ‘Words and Blood: Suicide and the Sound of the Soul in Inferno’, in ‘Sound Matters’, Speculum, 91 (2016), 998–1039
    [Google Scholar]
29. Copeland, Rita, ‘Why Women Can’t Read: Medieval Hermeneutics, Statutory Law, and the Lollard Heresy Trial’, in Representing Women: Law, Literature, and Feminism, ed. by Susan Sage Heinzelman and Zipporah Batshaw Wiseman (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1994), pp. 253–58
    [Google Scholar]
30. Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost, New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010)
    [Google Scholar]
31. Cooper, Helen, ‘Gender and Personification in Piers Plowman’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 5 (1991), 31–48
    [Google Scholar]
32. Davis, Rebecca, ‘Piers Plowman’ and the Books of Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
    [Google Scholar]
33. Debaise, Didier, Nature as Event: The Lure of the Possible, trans. by Michael Halewood (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
34. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. by Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987)
    [Google Scholar]
35. Dolphijn, Rick, and Iris van der Tuin, New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies (Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press, 2012)
    [Google Scholar]
36. Foertsch, Julie, and Morton Anne Gernsbacher, ‘In Search of Gender Neutrality: Is Singular They a Cognitively Efficient Substitute for Generic He?’, Psychological Science, 8 (1997), 106–11
    [Google Scholar]
37. Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. by Alan Sheridan (New York: Vintage, 1995)
    [Google Scholar]
38. Fowler, Elizabeth, ‘Misogyny and Economic Person in Skelton, Langland, and Chaucer’, Spenser Studies, 10 (1989), 245–73
    [Google Scholar]
39. Fowler, Elizabeth, ‘Civil Death and the Maiden: Agency and the Conditions of Contract in Piers Plowman’, Speculum, 70 (1995), 760–92
    [Google Scholar]
40. Gell, Alfred, Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford: Clarendon, 2013)
    [Google Scholar]
41. Griffiths, Lavinia, Personification in ‘Piers Plowman’ (Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, 1985)
    [Google Scholar]
42. Grosz, Elizabeth, The Incorporeal: Ontology, Ethics, and the Limits of Materialism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
43. Grusin, Richard, ‘Introduction’, in The Nonhuman Turn, ed. by Richard Grusin (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015), pp. vii–xxix
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hanna, Ralph, ‘Langland’s Patience and Reading Piers Plowman’, Notes and Queries, 64.4 (2017), 524–30
    [Google Scholar]
45. Haraway, Donna, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York: Routledge, 1991)
    [Google Scholar]
46. Harman, Graham, Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things (Peru: Open Court, 2005)
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hayles, Katherine, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999)
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hollander, Robert, Allegory in Dante’s ‘Commedia’ (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969)
    [Google Scholar]
49. Johnson, Barbara, ‘Apostrophe, Animation, and Abortion’, Diacritics, 16.1 (1986), 22–47
    [Google Scholar]
50. Jung, Jacqueline E., ‘The Boots of St Hedwig: Thoughts on the Limits of the Agency of Things’, in The Agency of Things in Medieval and Early Modern Art: Materials, Power and Manipulation, ed. by Grazyna Jurkowlaniec, Ika Matyjaszkiewicz, and Zuzanna Sarnec (Abingdon: Routledge, 2018), pp. 173–96
    [Google Scholar]
51. Jurkowlaniec, Grazyna, Ika Matyjaszkiewicz, and Zuzanna Sarnec, eds, The Agency of Things in Medieval and Early Modern Art: Materials, Power, and Manipulation (Abingdon: Routledge, 2018)
    [Google Scholar]
52. Karnes, Michelle, Imagination, Meditation, and Cognition in the Middle Ages (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2011)
    [Google Scholar]
53. Kirby, Telling Flesh: The Substance of the Corporeal (London: Routledge, 2014)
    [Google Scholar]
54. Kirk, Elizabeth D., Review of Personification in ‘Piers Plowman’, Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 8 (1996), 195
    [Google Scholar]
55. Knapp, Ethan, ‘Towards a Material Allegory: Allegory and Urban Space in Hoccleve, Langland, and Gower’, Exemplaria, 27 (2015), 93–109
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kumler, Aden, and Christopher R. Lakey, ‘Res et significatio: The Material Sense of Things in the Middle Ages’, Gesta, 51 (2012), 1–17
    [Google Scholar]
57. Lagerlund, H., Representation and Objects of Thought in Medieval Philosophy (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007)
    [Google Scholar]
58. Latour, Bruno, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988)
    [Google Scholar]
59. Latour, Bruno, We Have Never Been Modern, trans. by Catherine Porter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lawton, David, ‘The Subject of Piers Plowman’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 1 (1987), 1–30
    [Google Scholar]
61. Lawton, David, Voice in Later Medieval Literature: Public Interiorities (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
62. Lears, Adin E., ‘Noise, Soundplay, and Langland’s Poetics of Lolling in the Time of Wycliff’, Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 38 (2016), 165–200
    [Google Scholar]
63. Lees, Clare, ‘Gender and Exchange in Piers Plowman’, in Class and Gender in Early English Literature: Intersections, ed. by Britton J. Harwood and Gillian R. Overing (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994), pp. 112–30
    [Google Scholar]
64. Little, Katie, and Anne Lester, eds, English Language Notes, 53.2 (2015). Special issue on ‘Medieval Materiality’
    [Google Scholar]
65. Mann, Jill, ‘Langland and Allegory’, in The Cambridge Companion to ‘Piers Plowman’, ed. by Andrew Cole and Andrew Galloway (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 83–118
    [Google Scholar]
66. Melion, Walter S., and Bart Ramakers, Personification: Embodying Meaning and Emotion (Leiden: Brill, 2016)
    [Google Scholar]
67. Morton, Timothy, Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013)
    [Google Scholar]
68. Murphy, Colette, ‘Lady Holy Church and Meed the Maid: Re-envisioning Female Personifications in Piers Plowman’, in Feminist Readings in Middle English Literature: The Wife of Bath and All her Sect, ed. by Ruth Evans and Lesley Johnson (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 140–64
    [Google Scholar]
69. Panaccio, Claude, Ockham on Concepts (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004)
    [Google Scholar]
70. Pasnau, Robert, Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)
    [Google Scholar]
71. Paxson, James, The Poetics of Personification (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)
    [Google Scholar]
72. Quilligan, Maureen, The Language of Allegory: Defining the Genre (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992)
    [Google Scholar]
73. Raskolnikov, Masha, ‘Promising the Female, Delivering the Male: Transformations of Gender in Piers Plowman’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 19 (2005), 81–105
    [Google Scholar]
74. Robertson, Kellie, ‘Medieval Materialism: A Manifesto’, Exemplaria, 22 (2010), 99–118
    [Google Scholar]
75. Sanford, Anthony J., and Ruth Filik, ‘“They” as a Gender-Unspecified Singular Pronoun: Eye Tracking Reveals a Processing Cost’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60 (2007), 171–78
    [Google Scholar]
76. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, and Adam Frank, ‘Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins’, Critical Inquiry, 21 (1995), 496–522
    [Google Scholar]
77. Simpson, James, ‘The Power of Impropriety: Authorial Naming in Piers Plowman’, in William Langland’s ‘Piers Plowman’: A Book of Essays, ed. by Kathleen M. Hewett-Smith (London: Routledge, 2001), pp. 145–65
    [Google Scholar]
78. Smith, D. Vance, ‘Negative Langland’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 23 (2009), 35–59
    [Google Scholar]
79. Tachau, K. H., Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology, and the Foundation of Semantics, 1250–1345 (Leiden: Brill, 1988)
    [Google Scholar]
80. Trigg, Stephanie, ‘The Traffic in Medieval Women: Alice Perrers, Feminist Criticism, and Piers Plowman’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 12 (1998), 5–29
    [Google Scholar]
81. Watson, Nicholas, ‘Piers Plowman, Pastoral Theology, and Spiritual Perfectionism: Hawkyn’s Cloak and Patience’s Pater Noster’, Yearbook of Langland Studies, 21 (2007), 83–118
    [Google Scholar]
82. Zeeman, Nicolette, ‘Piers Plowman’ and the Medieval Discourse of Desire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)
    [Google Scholar]