Skip to content
1882
Volume 64, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0008-8994
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0498
file format pdf download PDF
read_more Read side by side viewer icon HTML

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines how chikungunya virus disease is epidemiologically and politically invisible in Brazil, unlike other diseases related to the mosquito, such as Zika, dengue, and yellow fever. It demonstrates the intricacy of identifying the presence of chikungunya, as its effects are generally materialised in pain, which is difficult to measure and quantify, and thus is invisible to medical and state bureaucracy. As with other chronic diseases, chikungunya transforms identities and social relations among those affected. By analysing the situation in Natal, in Northeast Brazil, and considering epidemics as social, economic, and political narratives as well as biomedical phenomena, the article asks how chikungunya might end when it has not even officially started.

© Brepols Publishers NV
Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.129635
2022-06-01
2025-12-04

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cnt/64/1/J.CNT.5.129635.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.129635&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aalst, M., Nelen, M., Goorhuis, A., Stijnis, C., & Grobusch, P. (2017). Long-term sequelae of chikungunya virus disease: A systematic review. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease,15, 8–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aureliano, W., & Gibbon, S. (2020). Judicialisation and the politics of rare disease in Brazil: Rethinking activism and inequalities. In J. Gamlin, S. Gibbon, P. Sesia, & L. Berrio (Eds.), Critical medical anthropology: Perspectives in and from Latin American (pp. 248–268). London, UK: UCL Press.
  3. Biehl, J., & Petryna, A. (2013). Legal remedies: Therapeutic markets and the judicialization of the right to health. In J. Biehl & A. Petryna (Eds.), When people come first: Critical studies in Global Health (pp. 325–346). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  4. Biehl, J., & Petryna, A. (2014). Peopling Global Health. Saúde e Sociedade, 23(2), 376–389.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Charters, E., & Heitman, K. (2021). How epidemics end. Centaurus, 63(1), 210–224.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. DaMatta, R. (1986). O que faz o Brasil, Brasil? Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Rocco.
  7. Diniz, D. (2017). Zika in Brazil: Women and children at the center of the epidemic. Brasília, Brazil: Letras Livres.
  8. Diniz, D., & Brito, L. (2019). Uma epidemia sem fim: zika e mulheres. In T. Rifiotis & J. Segata (Eds.), Políticas etnográficas no campo da moral (pp. 169–181). Brasília, Brazil: ABA Publicações, UFRGS.
  9. Espinosa, M. (2009). Epidemic invasions: Yellow fever and the limits of Cuban independence, 1878–1930. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Farmer, P. (2004). Pathologies of power: Health, human rights, and the new war on the poor. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  11. Farmer, P. (2012). Haiti after the earthquake. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
  12. Fassin, D. (2007). When bodies remember: Experiences and politics of AIDS in South Africa. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  13. Frey, F., & Schädler, J. (2021). Making power visible: Codifications, infrastructures, and representations of energy. Centaurus, 63(4), 621–630.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gamlin, J., Segata, J., Gibbon, S., Ortega, F., & Berrio, L. (2021). Centering a critical medical anthropology of COVID-19 in Global Health discourse. BMJ Global Health, 6,e006132.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenberg, A. (2018). Will the Zika virus enable a transplant of Roe v. Wade to Brazil? University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 18, 51–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hertzfeld, M. (2021). The social production of indifference: Exploring the symbolic roots of Western bureaucracy. London, UK: Routledge.
  17. Johnson, C. (2017). Pregnant woman versus mosquito: A feminist epidemiology of Zika virus. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(2), 233–250.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Löwy. I. (2017). Leaking containers: Success and failure in controlling the mosquito Aedes aegypti in Brazil. American Journal of Public Health, 107(4), 517–524.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Kelly, M., & Field, D. (1996). Medical sociology, chronic illness, and the body. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18(2), 241–257.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Ministry of Health , Brazil. (2021a). Dados epidemiológicos—Febre Chikungunya. Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN). Ministry of Health. Retrieved from http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php?area=0203&id=29878153
  21. Ministry of Health , Brazil. (2021b). Dados epidemiológicos—Zika vírus. Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN). Ministry of Health. Retrieved from http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php?area=0203&id=29878153
  22. Ministry of Health , Brazil. (2021c). Dados epidemiológicos—Dengue. Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação (SINAN). Ministry of Health. Retrieved from http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php?area=0203&id=29878153
  23. Moran-Thomas, A. (2019). Traveling with sugar: Chronicles of a global epidemic. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
  24. Paixão, E. S., Teixeira, M. G., & Rodrigues, L. C. (2018). Zika, chikungunya and dengue: The causes and threats of new and re-emerging arboviral diseases. BMJ Global Health, 3, e000530.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Palmer, S. (2010). Launching Global Health: The Caribbean odyssey of the Rockefeller Foundation. Chicago, IL: University of Michigan Press.
  26. Rasanathan, J., MacCarthy, S., Diniz, D., Torreele, E., & Gruskin, S. (2017). Engaging human rights in the response to the evolving Zika virus epidemic. American Journal of Public Health, 107(4), 525–531.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Segata, J. (2017). O Aedes aegypti e o digital. Horizontes Antropológicos, 23(48), 19–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Segata, J. (2019). El mosquito-oráculo y otras tecnologías. Tabula Rasa, 32, 125–135.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Segata, J. (2020). Covid-19, biossegurança e antropologia. Horizontes Antropológicos, 26(57), 275–313.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Segata, J. (2021). Enacting politics with mosquitoes: Beyond eradication and control. In M. Hall & D. Tamir (Eds.), Mosquitopia? The place of pests in a healthy world (pp. 165–182). London, UK: Routledge.
  31. Valente, P. (2017). Zika and reproductive rights in Brazil: Challenge to the right to health. American Journal of Public Health, 107(9), 1376–1380.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Vargha, D. (2016). After the end of disease: Rethinking the epidemic narrative. Somatosphere. Retrieved from http://somatosphere.net/2016/after-the-end-of-disease-rethinking-the-epidemic-narrative.html/
  33. Williamson, E. (2018). Care in the time of Zika: Notes on the “afterlife” of the epidemic in Salvador (Bahia), Brazil. Interface—Comunicação, Saúde e Educação, 22(66), 685–696.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. World Health Organization . (2016). WHO statement on the first meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR 2005) Emergency Committee on Zika virus and observed increase in neurological disorders and neonatal malformations. World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/news/item/01-02-2016-who-statement-on-the-first-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-(ihr-2005)-emergency-committee-on-zika-virus-and-observed-increase-in-neurological-disorders-and-neonatal-malformations
/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.129635
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv