Skip to content
1882
Volume 64, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0008-8994
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0498

Abstract

Abstract

The beginnings of epidemics are often told as if they are simple to locate in time. They take the form of a crisis, and as such, function as great synchronisers of different temporalities, bringing social temporalities “in line” with biological ones. In the case of the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, political processes that are usually slow were accelerated in order to “catch up with” the fast pace of the virus's reproduction, as policymakers saw a need to contain the virus. The end of an epidemic, on the other hand, is more difficult to pinpoint. This can be attributed to the fact that the myriad actors involved in and affected by an epidemic operate on diverging time scales. Although seemingly synchronised from its outset, these lifetimes become un-synchronised as the epidemic unfolds. Some effects of an epidemic outbreak are easily observed, such as infection rates and the number of deceased. Others-psychological or medical after-effects, or the lasting memory in a population-may be harder to spot. Declaring that an epidemic has “ended” usually relies on the ceasing of the former, not the latter. However, as this article argues, the ending(s) of an epidemic should be regarded in the plural, each operating within its own rhythm and scale. This article explores the multiplicity of lifetimes involved in epidemics-human, microbial, institutional-and tries to give an explanation as to how epidemics end (or linger on) using an approach of multiple temporalities.

Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.129943
2022-06-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cnt/64/1/J.CNT.5.129943.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.129943&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adam, B. (1990). Time and social theory. London, UK: Polity Press.
  2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  4. Beckett, G. (2013). The politics of emergency. Reviews in Anthropology, 42,85101.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Caduff, C. (2014). Sick weather ahead: On data-mining, crowd-sourcing and white noise. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 32, 3246.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Caduff, C. (2015). Pandemic perhaps: Dramatic events in a public culture of danger. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  7. Charters, E., & Heitman,K. (2021). How epidemics end. Centaurus, 63(1), 210224.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coronavirus declared global health emergency by WHO. (2020, January 31). BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51318246
  9. Fassin, D., & Pandolfi, M. (2010). Contemporary states of emergency: The politics of military and humanitarian interventions. New York, NY: Zone Books.
  10. Fishel, S. R. (2017). The microbial state: Global thriving and the body politic. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  11. Fissell, M. E., Greene, J. A., Packard, R. M., & Schafer, J. A. (2020). Introduction: Reimagining epidemics. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 94, 543561.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Greene, J., & Vargha, D. (2020, June 30). How epidemics end. Boston Review. Retrieved from http://bostonreview.net/science-nature/jeremy-greene-dora-vargha-how-epidemics-end
  13. Helihy, D. (1997). The Black Death and the transformation of the west. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  14. Herder , J. G. (1998). Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. In H. D. Irmscher (Ed.), Schriften zur Literatur und Philosophie 1792–1800 (pp. 303–640). Berlin, Germany: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag. (Original work published 1799)
  15. Jordheim, H. (2014). Introduction: multiple times and the work of synchronization. History and Theory, 53, 498518. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jordheim, H., & Wigen, E. (2018). Conceptual synchronisation: From progress to crisis.Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 46(3), 421–439. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jordheim, H., Lie, A. K., LjungbergE., & Wigen, E. (2020, April 2). Epidemic times. Somatosphere. Retrieved from http://somatosphere.net/2020/epidemic-times.html/
  18. Kirby, V. (2011). Quantum anthropologies: Life at large. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  19. Koronakommisjonen. (2021). Myndighetenes håndtering av koronapandemien. Rapport fra Koronakommisjonen. Oslo, Norway: Departementenes sikkerhets- og serviceorganisasjon. Retrieved from https://www.koronakommisjonen.no/files/2021/04/Koronakommisjonens_rapport_NOU.pdf
  20. Lynteris, C. (2014a). Introduction: The time of epidemics. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology,32(1), 2431.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lynteris, C. (2014b). Epidemics as events and as crises: Comparing two plague outbreaks in Manchuria (1910–1911 and 1920–1921). The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology,32(1), 6276.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Menant, J. C., & Gandevia, S. C. (2018). Poliomyelitis. In B. L. Day & S. R. Lord (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology (pp. 337–344). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
  23. Nuttall, S. (2009). Entanglement: Literary and cultural reflections on post-Apartheid. Johannesburg, South Africa: Wits University Press.
  24. Nøkleby, H., Berg, R. C., Muller, A. E., & Ames, H. M. R. (2021). Konsekvenser av covid-19 på barn og unges liv og helse. Oslo, Norway: Folkehelseinstituttet. Retrieved from https://www.fhi.no/globalassets/dokumenterfiler/rapporter/2021/konsekvenser-av-covid-19-pa-barn-og-unges-liv-og-helse-rapport-2021.pdf
  25. Peckham, R. (2020). The chronopolitics of COVID-19. American Literature, 92, 767779.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pegg, D. (2020, May 7). What was Exercise Cygnus and what did it find? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/07/what-was-exercise-cygnus-and-what-did-it-find
  27. Pépin, J. (2011). The origins of AIDS. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  28. Rosenberg, C. E. (1989). What is an epidemic? AIDS in historical perspective. Daedalus, 118, 117.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Roth, E. (2020). Epidemic temporalities: A concise literature review. Anthropology Today,36(4), 1316.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmitt, C. (2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty (G. Schwab, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  31. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273286.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Vargha, D. (2018). Polio across the Iron Curtain: Hungary's Cold War with an epidemic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Vargha, D (2020). Reconsidering the dramaturgy. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 94(4), 690–698.
  34. World Health Organization. (2020, March 18). Mental health and psychosocial considerations during the COVID-19 outbreak. World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/mental-health-considerations.pdf
  35. Williamson, K. E. (2018). Care in the time of Zika: Notes on the “afterlife” of the epidemic in Salvador (Bahia), Brazil. Dossier: Zika virus: An epidemic in/and its social world. Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação,22(66), 685696. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wittenberg, J. (2015). Conceptualizing historical legacies. East European Politics and Societies, 29, 366378. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.129943
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv