oa Rendering Magnetism Visible: Diagrams and Experiments Between 1300 and 1700

References

1. Albertus Magnus (Ps.). (1973). The book of secrets of Albertus Magnus of the virtues of herbs, stones and certain beasts, also a book of the marvels of the world (M. R. Best & F. Brightman, Eds.). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
2. Albertus Magnus (Ps.). (2011). Il De mirabilibus mundi tra tradizione magica e filosofia naturale (A. Sannino, Ed.). Florence, Italy: SISMEL edizioni del Galluzzo.
3. Baigrie, B. S. (1996). Descartes's scientific illustrations and “la grande mécanique de la nature.” In B. S. Baigrie (Ed.), Picturing knowledge: Historical and philosophical problems concerning the use of art in science (pp. 86–134). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
4. Balmer, H. (1956). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Erkenntnis des Erdmagnetismus. Aarau, Switzerland: H. R. Sauerländer.
5. Bellis, D. (2010). Le visible et l'invisible dans la pensée cartésienne: Figuration, imagination et vision dans la philosophie naturelle de René Descartes (PhD dissertation). Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Université Paris-Sorbonne, Paris, France.
6. Bénatouïl, T., & Draelants, I. (Eds.). (2011). Expertus sum: L'expérience par les sens dans la philosophie naturelle médiévale: Actes du colloque international de Pont-à-Mousson, 5–7 février 2009. Florence, Italy: SISMEL edizioni del Galluzzo.
7. Bexte, P. (2007). Magnetische Diagramme: Gilberts Einübung ins indirekte Sehen. In G. Wimböck, K. Leonhard, M. Friedrich, & F. Büttner (Eds.), Evidentia: Reichweiten visueller Wahrnehmung in der Frühen Neuzeit (pp. 309–329). Berlin, Germany: LIT.
8. Bianchi, M. L. (1982). Occulto e manifesto nella medicina del Rinascimento. Jean Fernel e Pietro Severino. Atti e Memorie dell'Accademia toscana di Scienze e Lettere La Colombaria, 47(33), 183–234.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bigg, C. (2017). Diagrams. In B. V. Lightman (Ed.), A companion to the history of science (pp. 557–571). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
10. Borrelli, A. (2017). Optical diagrams as “paper tools”: Della Porta's analysis of biconvex lenses from De refractione to De telescopio. In A. Borrelli, G. Hon, & Y. Zik (Eds.), The optics of Giambattista Della Porta (ca. 1535–1615): A reassessment (pp. 57–96). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
11. Cabeo, N. (1629). Philosophia magnetica. Ferrara, Italy: Apud Franciscum Succium.
12. Catton, P., & Montelle, C. (2012). To diagram, to demonstrate: To do, to see, and to judge in Greek geometry. Philosophia Mathematica, 20(1), 25–57. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Clarke, D. M. (1989). Occult powers and hypotheses: Cartesian natural philosophy under Louis XIV. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
14. Cohen, A. S. (2020). Diagramming the diagrammatic: Twelfth-century Europe. In M. A. Kupfer, J. H. Chajes, & A. S. Cohen (Eds.), The visualization of knowledge in medieval and early modern Europe (pp. 383–404). Turnholt, Belgium: Brepols.
15. Copenhaver, B. P. (1991). A tale of two fishes: Magical objects in natural history from antiquity through the Scientific Revolution. Journal of the History of Ideas, 52(3), 373–398. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Crowther, K. M., & Barker, P. (2013). Training the intelligent eye: Understanding illustrations in early modern astronomy texts. Isis, 104(3), 429–470. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cunningham, R. (2001). Virtual witnessing and the role of the reader in a new natural philosophy. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 34(3), 207–224.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Daston, L. (2015). Epistemic images. In A. A. Payne (Ed.), Vision and its instruments: Art, science, and technology in early modern Europe (pp. 13–35). University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
19. Daujat, J. (1945). Origines et formation de la théorie des phénomènes électriques et magnétiques. Paris, France: Hermann & Co.
20. Dear, P. R. (2006). The meanings of experience. In K. Park & L. Daston (Eds.), Early modern science (pp. 106–131). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Descartes, R. (1644). Principia philosophiae. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium.
22. Descartes, R. (1964–1974). Oeuvres de Descartes (C. Adam & P. Tannery, Eds.; Vols. 1–11). Paris, France: Vrin.
23. Downes, S. M. (2012). How much work do scientific images do? In A. Gross & E. Louson (Eds.), Visual representation and science (pp. 115–130). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://spontaneousgenerations.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations/issue/view/1386
24. Dupré, S. (2006). Visualization in Renaissance optics: The function of geometrical diagrams and pictures in the transmission of practical knowledge. In S. Kusukawa & I. Maclean (Eds.), Transmitting knowledge: Words, images, and instruments in early modern Europe (pp. 11–39). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25. Eastwood, B. S. (1989). Astronomy and optics from Pliny to Descartes: Texts, diagrams and conceptual structures. London, England: Varorium Reprints.
26. Fleming, J. D. (2011). The undiscoverable country: Occult qualities, scholasticism, and the end of nescience. In J. D. Fleming (Ed.), The invention of discovery, 1500–1700 (pp. 61–78). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
27. Foley, L. E., Gegear, R. J., & Reppert, S. M. (2011). Human cryptochrome exhibits light-dependent magnetosensitivity. Nature Communications, 2, 356. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
28. Franklin, J. (2000). Diagrammatic reasoning and modelling in the imagination: The secret weapons of the Scientific Revolution. In G. Freeland & A. Corones (Eds.), 1543 and all that: Image and word, change and continuity in the proto-scientific revolution (pp. 53–115). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
29. Fransen, S., & Reinhart, K. M. (2019). The practice of copying in making knowledge in early modern Europe: An introduction. Word et Image, 35(3), 211–222.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Frede, M. (1987). Essays in ancient philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
31. Freudenthal, G. (1983). Theory of matter and cosmology in William Gilbert's De magnete. Isis, 74(1), 22–37.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Frosini, F. (2013). “Come calamita il ferro”: Leonardo da Vinci dalla magia alla prospettiva (1487–1492). In F. Fiorani & A. Nova (Eds.), Leonardo da Vinci and optics: Theory and pictorial practice (pp. 113–153). Venice, Italy: Marsilio.
33. Gabbey, A. (2001). Mechanical philosophies and their explanations. In C. Lüthy, J. E. Murdoch, & W. R. Newman (Eds.), Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories (pp. 441–556). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
34. Garzoni, L. (2005). Trattati della calamita (M. Ugaglia, Ed.). Milan, Italy: FrancoAngeli.
35. Geek3. (2010, June). File:VFPt cylindrical magnet thumb.svg. Wikimedia Commons. Retrieved from https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10587119
36. Georgescu, L. (2013). One experiment, different uses: Floating magnetic bodies in Peregrinus, Norman and Gilbert. Journal of Early Modern Studies, 2(1), 81–103.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Georgescu, L. (2014). The diagrammatic dimension of William Gilbert's De magnete. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 47, 18–25.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Georgescu, L. (2017). Devising magnetism: Concepts and investigative practices (PhD dissertation). Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8526816
39. Gertsman, E. (2021). Abstraction in medieval art: Beyond the ornament. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
40. Gesner, C. (1565). De Rerum fossilium, lapidum et gemmarum maxime, figuris et similitudinibus liber. Zurich, Switzerland: Apud Gesnerum.
41. Giere, R. N. (1999). Using models to represent reality. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 41–57). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers.
42. Giere, R. N. (2004). How models are used to represent reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742–752. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
43. Gilbert, W. (1600). De magnete, magneticisque corporibus, et de magno magnete tellure; physiologia noua, plurimis & argumentis, & experimentis demonstrata. London, England: excudebat Short.
44. Gilbert, W. (1900). On the magnet, magnetick bodies also, and on the great magnet of the earth; a new physiology, demonstrated by many arguments & experiments (S. P. Thompson, Ed. & Trans.). London, England: Chiswick Press.
45. Gooding, D. (1980). Faraday, Thomson, and the concept of the magnetic field. The British Journal for the History of Science, 13(2), 91–120.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Goodwin, W. (2012). Visual representations of structure and the dynamics of scientific modeling. In A. Gross & E. Louson (Eds.), Visual representation and science (pp. 131–141). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://spontaneousgenerations.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/SpontaneousGenerations/issue/view/1386
47. Gormans, A. (2000). Imagination des Unsichtbaren. Zur Gattungstheorie des wissenschaftlichen Diagramms. In H. Holländer (Ed.), Erkenntnis, Erfindung, Konstruktion: Studien zur Bildgeschichte von Naturwissenschaften und Technik vom 16. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert (pp. 51–71). Berlin, Germany: Mann.
48. Grandami, J. (1645). Nova demonstratio immobilitatis terrae petita ex virtute magnetica et quædam alia ad effectus & leges magneticas, usumque longitudinum & universam geographiam spectantia, de novo inventa. La Flèche, France: G. Griveau.
49. Hackmann, W. D. (1993). Natural philosophy textbook illustrations 1600–1800. In R. G. Mazzolini (Ed.), Non-verbal communication in science prior to 1900 (pp. 169–196). Florence, Italy: Olschki.
50. Halleux, R. (2007). Entre philosophie naturelle et savoir d'ingénieur: L'epistola de magnete de Pierre de Maricourt. Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences, 56(156–157), 3–17.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Harradon, H. D. (1943). Some early contributions to the history of geomagnetism: IV. Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, 48(3), 127–130.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hautefeuille, J. de, & Aubry, J. P. (1690). Magnetologia curiosa: Das ist, Gründtliche Abhandlung des Magneths: In zwey Abtheilungen enthalten. Mainz, Germany: Christoph Küchlern.
53. Hellmann, G. (Ed.). (1898). Rara magnetica 1269–1599. Berlin, Germany: A. Asher & Co.
54. Henry, J. (2001). Animism and empiricism: Copernican physics and the origins of William Gilbert's experimental method. Journal of the History of Ideas, 62(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
55. Hutchison, K. (1982). What happened to occult qualities in the scientific revolution? Isis, 73(2), 233–253.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Huygens, C. (1937). Mécanique théorique et physique de 1666 à 1695: Huygens à l'Académie Royale des Sciences (J. A. Vollgraff, Ed.). La Haye, The Netherlands: Nijhoff.
57. Ierodiakonou, K. (2002). Aristotle's use of examples in the prior analytics. Phronesis, 47(2), 127–152.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Jalobeanu, D. (2016). “Borders,” “leaps” and “orbs of virtue”: A contextual reconstruction of Francis Bacon's extension-related concepts. In K. Vermeir & J. Regier (Eds.), Boundaries, extents and circulations (pp. 229–254). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
59. Keteltas, B. E. (1609). Het ghebrvyck der naeld-vviisinge tot dienste der zee-vaert beschreven. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Barent Otsz.
60. King, W. J. (1959). The natural philosophy of William Gilbert and his predecessors. Contributions from the Museum of History and Technology Series Bulletin, 218, 121–139.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kircher, A. (1641). Magnes; sive, De arte magnetica opus tripartitum. Rome, Italy: Ex typographia Ludovici Grignani, sumptibus Hermanni Scheus.
62. Kleinert, A. (2003). Wie funktionierte das Perpetuum mobile des Petrus Peregrinus? NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, 11(3), 155–170. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
63. Krafft, F. (1970). Sphaera activitatis—orbis virtutis. Das Entstehen der Vorstellung von Zentralkräften. Sudhoffs Archiv, 54, 113–140.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Kupfer, M. A., Chajes, J. H., & Cohen, A. S. (Eds.). (2020). The visualization of knowledge in medieval and early modern Europe. Turnholt, Belgium: Brepols.
65. Lattmann, C. (2019). Mathematische Modellierung bei Platon zwischen Thales und Euklid. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
66. Leonardi, C., & Arlensis de Scudalupis, P. (1610). Speculum lapidum Camilli Leonardi. Cui Accessit Sympathia septem metallorum ac septem selectorum lapidum ad planetas. D. Petri Arlensis de Scudalupis. Paris, France: Apud Carolum Sevestre, Davidem Gillium et Joannem Petitpas.
67. Lüthy, C. (2006). Where logical necessity turns into visual persuasion: Descartes' clear and distinct illustrations. In S. Kusukawa & I. Maclean (Eds.), Transmitting knowledge: Words, images, and instruments in early modern Europe (pp. 97–133). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
68. Lüthy, C. (2018). What does a diagram prove that other images do not? Images and imagination in the Kepler-Fludd controversy. In C. Lüthy, C. Swan, P. J. J. M. Bakker, & C. Zittel (Eds.), Image, imagination, and cognition: Medieval and early modern theory and practice (pp. 227–274). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
69. Magnetic attraction and repulsion. (n.d.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/science/magnetism/images-videos#/media/1/357334/145755
70. Maignan, E. (1653). Pars secunda philosophiae naturae. Toulouse, France: Bosc.
71. Marr, A. (2016). Knowing images. Renaissance Quarterly, 69(3), 1000–1013.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Martin, C. (2017). Elements and qualities. In T. F. Glick, S. J. Livesey, & F. Wallis (Eds.), Medieval science, technology and medicine: An encyclopedia (pp. 157–159). London, England: Routledge.
73. Mendell, H. (1998). Making sense of Aristotelian demonstration. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 16, 160–225.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Mersenne, M. (1932–1988). Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne, religieux minime (P. Tannery & C. de Waard, Eds.; Vols. 1–17). Paris, France: G. Beauchesne.
75. Müller, K. (2011). Gott ist (k)eine Sphäre. Visualisierungen des Göttlichen in geometrisch-abstrakten Diagrammen des Mittelalters. In R. Hoeps (Ed.), Handbuch der Bildtheologie: Zwischen Zeichen und Präsenz (Vol. 3, pp. 311–355). Paderborn, Germany: F. Schöningh.
76. Netz, R. (1999). The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics: A study in cognitive history. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
77. Nießner, C., Denzau, S., Stapput, K., Ahmad, M., Peichl, L., Wiltschko, W., & Wiltschko, R. (2013). Magnetoreception: Activated cryptochrome 1a concurs with magnetic orientation in birds. Interface: Journal of the Royal Society, 10(88). https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
78. Norman, R. (1581). The new attractive: Containing a short discourse of the magnes or lodestone. London, England: Ballard.
79. North, J. D. (2004). Diagram and thought in medieval science. In M.-T. Zenner (Ed.), Villard's legacy: Studies in medieval technology, science and art in memory of Jean Gimpel (pp. 265–287). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
80. Pasnau, R. (2011). Scholastic qualities, primary and secondary. In L. Nolan (Ed.), Primary and secondary qualities: The historical and ongoing debate (pp. 41–61). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
81. Petrus Peregrinus. (1558). De magnete, seu rota perpetui motus, libellus (A. P. Gasser, Ed.). Augsburg, Germany: Philipp Ulhart d.Ä.
82. Petrus Peregrinus. (1995). Opera (L. Sturlese & R. B. Thomson, Eds.). Pisa, Italy: Scuola normale superiore.
83. Porta, G. della. (1589). Magiae naturalis libri XX. Naples, Italy: Salvian.
84. Pumfrey, S. (1990). Neo-Aristotelianism and the magnetic philosophy. In J. Henry & S. Hutton (Eds.), New perspectives on Renaissance thought: Essays in the history of science, education and philosophy, in memory of Charles B. Schmitt (pp. 177–189). London, England: Duckworth.
85. Raimundus Lullus. (1520). De virtute magnetis. Rome, Italy: Marcello Silber.
86. Raphael, R. (2013). Teaching through diagrams: Galileo's Dialogo and Discorsi and his Pisan readers. Early Science and Medicine, 18(1–2), 201–230.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Regius, H. (1646). Fundamenta physices. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium.
88. Saito, K. (2012). Traditions of the diagram, tradition of the text: A case study. Synthese, 186(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
89. Sander, C. (2016). Early-modern magnetism: Uncovering new textual links between Leonardo Garzoni SJ (1543–1592), Paolo Sarpi OSM (1552–1623), Giambattista Della Porta (1535–1615), and the Accademia dei Lincei. Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu, 85(2), 303–363.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Sander, C. (2020a). Magnes: Der Magnetstein und der Magnetismus in den Wissenschaften der Frühen Neuzeit. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
91. Sander, C. (2020b). Magnetism for librarians. Leone Allacci's De magnete (1625) and its relation to Giulio Cesare LaGalla's Disputatio de sympathia et antipathia (1623). Erudition and the Republic of Letters, 5(3), 274–307. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
92. Sander, C. (2021a). Images in Petrus Peregrinus' Epistola de magnete (1269–1650). Rara Magnetica. Retrieved from https://doi.org// [Crossref]
93. Sander, C. (2021b). Nutrition and magnetism. An ancient idea fleshed out in early modern natural philosophy, medicine and alchemy. In R. Lo Presti & G. Korobili (Eds.), Nutrition and nutritive soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism (pp. 285–318). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
94. Sander, C. (in press-a). Magnetism in an Aristotelian world (1550–1700). In B. Roling, S. Kılıç, & B. Wallura (Eds.), Aristoteles und die Naturphilosophie an den mitteleuropäischen Universitäten der Frühen Neuzeit, 1600–1700. Wiesbaden, Germany: Harrassowitz Verlag.
95. Sander, C. (in press-b). Teaching magnetism in a Cartesian world (1650–1700). In D. Cellamare & M. Mantovani (Eds.), Descartes in the classroom. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
96. Sander, C. (in press-c). Tempering occult qualities. Magnetism and complexio in early modern medical thought. Early Science and Medicine.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Sander, C. (in press-d). Terra AB: Descartes's imagery on magnetism and its legacy. In D. Cellamare & M. Mantovani (Eds.), Cartesian images: Picturing natural philosophy in the early modern age. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
98. Sarpi, P. (1996). Pensieri naturali, metafisici e matematici (L. Cozzi & L. Sosio, Eds.). Milan, Italy: R. Ricciardi.
99. Smets, A., & Lüthy, C. (2009). Words, lines, diagrams, images: Towards a history of scientific imagery. Early Science and Medicine, 14(1–3), 398–439.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Smith, J. A. (1992). Precursors to Peregrinus: The early history of magnetism and the mariner's compass in Europe. Journal of Medieval History, 18(1), 21–74.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Sonar, T. (2016). … in the darkest night that is …: Briggs, Blundeville, Wright, and the misconception of finding latitude. Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics, 32(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
102. Steinle, F. (2008). How experiments make concepts fail: Faraday and magnetic curves. In G. Hon, J. Schickore, & F. Steinle (Eds.), Going amiss in experimental research (pp. 119–135). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
103. Steinle, F. (2012). Goals and fates of concepts: The case of magnetic poles. In U. Feest & F. Steinle (Eds.), Scientific concepts and investigative practice (pp. 105–126). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
104. Strayer, J. (2014). Subjects and objects: Art, essentialism, and abstraction. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
105. Strazzoni, A. (2015). The didactic, persuasive and scientific uses of illustrations after Descartes. Noctua: La Tradizione Filosofica Dall'antico al Moderno, 1, 432–480. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
106. Taisnier, J. (1562). Opusculum perpetua memoria dignissimum: de natura magnetis, et eius effectibus. Cologne, Germany: Apud Ioannum Birckmannum.
107. Taisnier, J. (1575). A very necessarie and profitable booke concerning nauigation, compiled in Latin by Ioannes Taisnierus (R. Eden, Trans.). London, England: Richard Iugge.
108. Ugaglia, M. (2005). Introduzione. In M. Ugaglia (Ed.), Trattati della calamita (pp. 7–83). Milan, Italy: FrancoAngeli.
109. Ugaglia, M. (2006). The science of magnetism before Gilbert: Leonardo Garzoni's treatise on the loadstone. Annals of Science, 63(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
110. Waddell, M. A. (2015). Jesuit science and the end of nature's secrets. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
111. Wang, X. (2016). Francis Bacon and magnetical cosmology. Isis, 107(4), 707–721.
     [Google Scholar]
112. Wardy, R. (2007). The chain of change: A study of Aristotle's Physics VII. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
113. Weill-Parot, N. (2010). Astrology, astral influences, and occult properties in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Traditio, 65(1), 201–230.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Weill-Parot, N. (2013). Points aveugles de la nature: La rationalité scientifique médiévale face à l'occulte, l'attraction magnétique et l'horreur du vide (XIIIe-milieu du XVe siècle). Paris, France: Les Belles Lettres.
115. Wild, I. (1906). Zur Geschichte der Qualitates Occultae. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und spekulative Theologie, 20, 307–345.
116. Wilson, C. (1988). Visual surface and visual symbol: The microscope and the occult in early modern science. Journal of the History of Ideas, 49(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
117. Wiltschko, R., & Wiltschko, W. (1995). Magnetic orientation in animals. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
118. Yoder, J. G. (2013). Catalogue of the manuscripts of Christiaan Huygens, including a concordance with his oeuvres complètes. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
119. Yong, E. (2010, August 7). Robins can literally see magnetic fields, but only if their vision is sharp. National Geographic. Retrieved from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/robins-can-literally-see-magnetic-fields-but-only-if-their-vision-is-sharp
120. Zittel, C. (2007). Theatrum philosophicum: Erfahrungsmodi und Formen der Wissensrepräsentation bei Descartes. Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag.