Skip to content
1882
Volume 52, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0870-0133
  • E-ISSN: 2736-3082

Abstract

Abstract

The present article focuses on Giorgio Vasari’s uses of in his (1550/1568), informed by his rhetorical education and progymnasmatic understanding of as it was passed down at the beginning of the sixteenth century. Although some authors have pointed out that the father of early art history followed ekphrastic patterns to describe works of art, no studies examine the progymnasmatic influence on Giorgio Vasari’s rhetorical education and art historical writing. Based on the manuals and model that were commonplace at that time, this article surveys the ancient concept of that Latin teachers presumably conveyed to their students. I argue that this notion was most likely influenced not only by Aphthonius’ but also by byzantine sources, indirect knowledge of Nicholas of Myra’s progymnasmatic explanations on of pictures and sculptures and by collections of model attributed to Libanius. An analysis of Vasarian descriptions provides evidence of progymnasmatic qualities in early modern art history and opens new perspectives for a critical comparison with former art historical texts.

This is an open access article made available under a cc by-nc-nd 4.0 International License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.144624
2024-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/euphr/52/1/J.EUPHR.5.144624.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.144624&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alpers, S. (1995). “Ekphrasis und Kunstanschauung in Vasaris Viten”. In Beschreibungskunst, Kunstbeschreibung, ed. G. Boehm, H. Pfotenhauer. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, pp. 217-253.
  2. Alpers. S. (1960). “Ekphrasis and aesthetic attitudes in Vasari’s Lives”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 23: 190-215.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arcos Pereira, T. (2017). “La versión latina de Joannes Maria Catanaeus de los Aphthonii Progymnasmata: La editio princeps de 1507 y la edición romana de 1517”. RELat 17: 137-153.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bachmann, C. (2015). Wenn man die Welt als Gemälde betrachtet. Studien zu den Eikones Philostrats des Älteren. Heidelberg: Verlag Antike, pp. 22-25.
  5. Barolsky, P. (2011). “The Ultimate Paradox of Vasari’s Lives”. Notes in the History of Art 31.1: 10-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Britton, P. D. (2009). “Michelangelo and the rerum corporis in Vasari’s Vite: The Limits of Physiognomy”. Notes in the History of Art 28.3: 13-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Black, R. (1996). Studio e scuola in Arezzo durante il Medioevo e il Rinacimento: i documenti d’archivio fino al 1530. Rome: Herder.
  8. Black, R. (1987). “Humanism and Education in Renaissance Arezzo”. I Tatti Studies: Essays in the Renaissance 2: 171-237.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blum, G. (2011). Giorgio Vasari. Der Erfinder der Renaissance. Munich: C. H. Beck.
  10. Ciccolella, F. (2008). Donati Graeci. Learning Greek in the Renaissance, Leiden – Boston: Brill.
  11. Conti, A. (1992). “Osservazioni e appunti sulla Vita di Leonardo di Giorgio Vasari”. In Kunst des Cinquecento in der Toskana, ed. Monika Cämmerer. Munich: Bruckmann, pp. 26-36.
  12. Curtius, E. R. (1990 [1953]). European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  13. Erasmus (1528). De ratione studii ac legendi interpretandique auctores liber. Lyon: Sebastian Gryphius.
  14. Felten. J. (ed.) (1913). Nicolai Progymnasmata. Leipzig: Teubner.
  15. Fernández Delgado, J. A. (2007). “Influencia literaria de los progymnasmata”. In Escuela y literatura en Grecia Antigua, ed. J. A. Fernández Delgado, F. Pordomingo, A. Stramaglia. Cassino: Università degli Studi di Cassino, pp. 273-306.
  16. Fernández Delgado, J. A., Pordomingo, F. (ed.) (2017). La retórica escolar grieca y su influencia literaria. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
  17. Feser, S. (ed.), Lorini. V. (tr.) (2009). Giorgio Vasari. Das Leben des Francesco Salviati und des Cristofano Gherardi. Berlin: Wagenbach.
  18. Flanigan, T. (2019). “Mona Lisa’s Smile”. Studies in Iconology 40: 183-230.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Foerster, R. (1904). “Philostrats Gemälde in der Renaissance”. Jahrbuch der Königlich Preußischen Kunstsammlungen 25: 16-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Foester, R. (ed.) (1903). Libanii opera, vol. 1. Leipzig: Teubner.
  21. Gaunt, W. (ed.), Hinds, A. B. (tr.) (1980 [1963]). Giorgio Vasari. The Lives of the Painters, Sculptors, and Architects. 1-4 vol. London: Dent, New York: Dutton.
  22. Gibson, C. A. (ed.) (2008). Libanius’s Progymnasmata: Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.
  23. Gombrich, E. H. (1995). Art and Illusion. A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. London: Phaidon.
  24. Grendler, P. F. (1989). Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literacy and Learning, 1300-1600. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  25. Griffins, G. (1988). “Classical Greece and the Italian Renaissance”. In Paths from Ancient Greece, ed. Carol G. Thomas. Leiden – New York: Brill.
  26. Halm, K. (1863). Rhetores Latini minores. Leipzig: Teubner.
  27. Holroyd, C. (ed., tr.) (1903). Michael Angelo Buonarroti, with Translations of the Life of the Master by his Scholar, Ascanio Condivi, and three Dialogues from the Portuguese by Francisco d’Ollanda. London – New York, NY: Duckworth and Company/Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  28. Hunger, H. (1978). Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur der Byzantiner, vol. 1 and 2. Munich: C. H. Beck.
  29. Kennedy, G. A. (2003). Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.
  30. Kennedy, G. A. (1994). A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  31. Kennedy, G. A. (1983). Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  32. Kraus, M. (2008). “Aphthonius and the Progymnasmata in Rhetorical Theory and Practice”. In Sizing Up Rhetoric, ed. D. Zarefsky, E. Benacka. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, pp. 52-57.
  33. Larson, O. K. (1957). “Vasari’s Descriptions of Stage Machinery”. Educational Theatre Journal 9.4: 287-299.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Loveday, T., Forster, E. S. (ed., tr.) (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. J. Barnes, 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  35. Muñoz Morcillo, J. (2019). “Aproximación a los cánones de la écfrasis, entre tradición literaria e influencia escolar”. RCCM 61.2: 475-495.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Muñoz Morcillo, J. (2021). La ékphrasis griega, de la Antigüedad a Bizancio. Berlin: Peter Lang.
  37. Montes Serrano, C. (2009). “Fidias y Alcámenes. Una indagación sobre la migración de las ideas”. In Estudios de historia del arte: homenaje al profesor de la Plaza Santiago, ed. J. M. Parrado del Olmo, F. Gutiérrez Baños. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid, pp. 137-142.
  38. Passalacqua, M. (2005). “Priscianus Caesariensis”. In La trasmissione dei testi latini del Medioevo / Mediaeval Latin Texts and Their Transmission, vol. 2, ed. P. Chiesa, L. Castaldi. Florence: Sismel, pp. 511-519.
  39. Passalacqua, M. (ed.) (1987). Prisciani Caesariensis Opuscula. De figuris numerorum, De metris Terentii, Praeexercitamina, Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.
  40. Passalacqua, M. (1978). I codici di Prisciano. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.
  41. Patrizi, G. (2004). “Le ragioni dell’ecfrasi. Origini e significato delle narrazioni vasariane”. In Ecfrasi. Modelli ed esempi fra Medioevo e Rinascimento, vol. 2, ed. G. Venturi, M. Farnetti. Roma: Bulzoni Editore, pp. 421-430.
  42. Patillon, M., Bolognesi, G. (ed.) (1997). Aelius Théon. Progymnasmata. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
  43. Paton, W. R. (1918). The Greek Anthology, vol. V, books 13-16. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  44. Posselt, C. (2013). Das Porträt in den Viten Vasaris, Cologne: Böhlau.
  45. Rabe, H. (ed.) (1926). Aphthonius. Progymnasmata (= Rhetores Graeci, vol. 10). Leipzip: Teubner.
  46. Rabe, H. (ed.) (1913). Hermogenes. Progymnasmata (= Rhetores Graeci, vol. 6). Leipzip: Teubner.
  47. Roby, C. A. (2016). Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature. The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  48. Rosenberg, R. (1995). “Von der Ekphrasis zur wissenschaftlichen Bildbeschreibung. Vasari, Agucchi, Félibien, Burckhardt”. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 58: 297-318.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schönberger, O. (ed., tr.) (1968). Philostratos. Die Bilder. Griechisch-Deutsch. Munich: De Gruyter.
  50. Vasari G. (1568). Le vite de’ piv eccellenti pittori, scvltori et architettori. Florenz: Givnti.
  51. Walter, I. (ed., tr.) (2018). Ascanio Condivi. Das Leben des Michelangelo Buonarroti. Berlin: Wagenbach.
  52. Webb, R. (2009). Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.
  53. Webb, R. (2007). “The Model Ekphraseis of Nikolaos the Sophist as Memory Images”. In Rhetorical Culture in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, ed. M. Grünbart. Berlin – New York: De Gruyter, pp. 463-480.
  54. Webb, R. (2000). “Picturing the Past: Uses of Ekphrasis in the Deipnosophistae and Other Works of the Second Sophistic”. In Athenaeus and his World: Reading Greek Culture in the Roman Empire, ed. D. Braund, J. Wilkins. Exeter: Exeter University Press, pp. 218-226.
  55. Winner, M. (1995). “Ekphrasis bei Vasari”. In Beschreibungskunst, Kunstbeschreibung, ed. G. Boehm, H. Pfotenhauer. Munich: Wilhelm Fink, pp. 259-278.
  56. Zwecker, L. (2018). Pietro Aretino. Der Machiavelli der Kunstkritik. Bern, Wien: Piet Meyer.
/content/journals/10.1484/J.EUPHR.5.144624
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Ekphrasis; Giorgio Vasari; Progymnasmata
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv